Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

disable future dates for DOB date picker #8176

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2022
Merged

disable future dates for DOB date picker #8176

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2022

Conversation

thesahindia
Copy link
Member

Details

Disabled the future dates in DOB date picker, now the user won't be able to select the future dates

Fixed Issues

$ #8151

Tests | QA Steps

  1. Go to workspace > Connect Bank Account
  2. Choose any option > Go to company step
  3. Fill the form and save > Personal information step
  4. Verify DOB field date picker doesn't allow selecting future dates
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Review Checklist

Contributor (PR Author) Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (if applicable, i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I added steps to cover offline scenarios (if applicable, i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests & verified they passed on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors related to changes in this PR
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I added comments when the code was not self explanatory
    • I put all copy / text shown in the product in all src/languages/* files (if applicable)
    • I followed proper naming convention for platform-specific files (if applicable)
    • I followed style guidelines (in Styling.md) for all style edits I made
    • I followed the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md)
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • Has the displayName property if it’s a Functional Component
    • Has Storybook stories (optional)
    • Has Unit tests (optional)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn’t already exist
    • The style can’t be created with a StyleUtils function
      (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)

PR Reviewer Checklist

  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover failure scenarios (if applicable, i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I verified steps cover offline scenarios (if applicable, i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors related to changes in this PR
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified comments were added when the code was not self explanatory
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files (if applicable)
    • I verified proper naming convention for platform-specific files was followed (if applicable)
    • I verified style guidelines were followed
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components are not impacted by changes in this PR (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • Has the displayName property if it’s a Functional Component
    • Has Storybook stories (optional)
    • Has Unit tests (optional)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn’t already exist
    • The style can’t be created with a StyleUtils function
      (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Screenshots

Web

Screen.Recording.2022-03-16.at.11.59.11.AM.mov

Mobile Web

Screen.Recording.2022-03-16.at.12.29.07.PM.mov

Desktop

Screenshot 2022-03-16 at 11 55 34 AM

iOS

Screen.Recording.2022-03-16.at.12.27.49.PM.mov

Android

Getting error when trying to visit the personal information step (asked about it on slack)

@thesahindia thesahindia requested a review from a team as a code owner March 16, 2022 09:31
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested review from mountiny and rushatgabhane and removed request for a team March 16, 2022 09:31
Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mountiny LGTM! 🎉 Errors work well even if we use a future date.

PR Reviewer Checklist

  • I verified the PR has a small number of commits behind main
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the testing environment is mentioned in the test steps
  • I verified testing steps cover success & fail scenarios (if applicable)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors related to changes in this PR
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified comments were added when the code was not self explanatory
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files (if applicable)
    • I verified proper naming convention for platform-specific files was followed (if applicable)
    • I verified style guidelines were followed
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components are not impacted by changes in this PR (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified the UI performance was not affected (the performance is the same than main branch)
  • If a new component is created I verified that a similar component doesn't exist in the codebase

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@thesahindia @rushatgabhane Thank you very much!

@mountiny mountiny merged commit dcce4ce into Expensify:main Mar 16, 2022
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by @mountiny in version: 1.1.44-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Seems like mWeb didn't like this changes. @thesahindia can you test this?

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Mar 17, 2022

Unfortunately, Safari on iOS doesn't support max attribute
https://caniuse.com/input-datetime

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

This is fine to accept, we have verification that won't allow users to input future dates, so nothing can go wrong and Safari will start to support this prop at some point.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants