Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open old dot links with openOldDotLink() function #8769

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 3, 2022
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,9 +8,11 @@ import htmlRendererPropTypes from './htmlRendererPropTypes';
import * as HTMLEngineUtils from '../htmlEngineUtils';
import Text from '../../Text';
import CONST from '../../../CONST';
import CONFIG from '../../../CONFIG';
import styles from '../../../styles/styles';
import Navigation from '../../../libs/Navigation/Navigation';
import AnchorForCommentsOnly from '../../AnchorForCommentsOnly';
import * as Link from '../../../libs/actions/Link';

const AnchorRenderer = (props) => {
const htmlAttribs = props.tnode.attributes;
Expand All @@ -22,14 +24,15 @@ const AnchorRenderer = (props) => {
const attrHref = htmlAttribs.href || '';
const internalExpensifyPath = (attrHref.startsWith(CONST.NEW_EXPENSIFY_URL) && attrHref.replace(CONST.NEW_EXPENSIFY_URL, ''))
|| (attrHref.startsWith(CONST.STAGING_NEW_EXPENSIFY_URL) && attrHref.replace(CONST.STAGING_NEW_EXPENSIFY_URL, ''));
const oldDotPath = attrHref.startsWith(CONFIG.EXPENSIFY.EXPENSIFY_URL) && attrHref.replace(CONFIG.EXPENSIFY.EXPENSIFY_URL, '');
mateusbra marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mateusbra we should also take care of staging path right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mateusbra mateusbra Apr 27, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we really need it? I mean, will we have staging url paths being used on the app?
We need the staging path for New expensify urls because when we are on staging we need to navigate over the app,but as we are talking about the old dot path, I think we won't need it at all.

If you think we need I can add it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you're right, it isn't needed because we aren't using staging url


// If we are handling a New Expensify link then we will assume this should be opened by the app internally. This ensures that the links are opened internally via react-navigation
// instead of in a new tab or with a page refresh (which is the default behavior of an anchor tag)
if (internalExpensifyPath) {
if (internalExpensifyPath || oldDotPath) {
return (
<Text
style={styles.link}
onPress={() => Navigation.navigate(internalExpensifyPath)}
onPress={() => (internalExpensifyPath ? Navigation.navigate(internalExpensifyPath) : Link.openOldDotLink(oldDotPath))}
>
<TNodeChildrenRenderer tnode={props.tnode} />
</Text>
Expand Down