-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Abort model cleanly in ifsinterface and standalone on errors #661
Open
suvarchal
wants to merge
8
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
suvi_fixes_clean_aborts
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+243
−85
Open
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c6892b0
proper mpi abort in case of standalone and ifsinterface
suvarchal d6cba7d
add checking namelist exists and exit cleanly when it doesn't
suvarchal c8884d6
add clear error message when error in reading a part in namelist
suvarchal ec6c735
add missing use of mod_parsup
suvarchal ddc783c
add consistent model cleanup in oce_mesh reading, use abort instead o…
suvarchal 3f6fb7b
Merge branch 'main' into suvi_fixes_clean_aborts
suvarchal a4d3b09
Merge branch 'main' into suvi_fixes_clean_aborts
JanStreffing 44273e2
Update oce_mesh.F90
suvarchal File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does that mean changes are were easy to make or would be easy?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It handles core parts and there are other parts like ice modules, blowup that may need more inspection on aborts, clean kind to stop normally vs really abort kind. this can be easy to do once we go through those parts, but i would leave it here for now, going into all those parts to me is another issue. @JanStreffing thanks for confirming communicator in oifs-fesom case, then nothing about that configuration to worry about with these changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i want to do one small test with OpenIFS-FESOM2 before I merge.