Resolves #39: Replacing usage of std::string
with StringRef
for Datakey
and DataValue
#194
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For the following reasons its bad to use
std::string
for bytesstd::string
for bytes is confusingstd::string
toStringRef
is dangerous, especially ifstd::string
is r-valuestd::string
toStandalone<StringRef>
is unnecessary extra copy. This is happening a lot.std::string
is passed back toFDB::Transaction::get()
orFDB::Transaction::set()
, which convert it toStringRef
anyway. Semantics are very confusing.Resolves #39, even though we still have some bad usages of
std::string
, the majority are changed.