-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug fix/44161 Remote exection history multi delete button #4027
Bug fix/44161 Remote exection history multi delete button #4027
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces various modifications across multiple files, primarily enhancing error handling, user interaction, and data management. Key changes include updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant UI
participant ActionEditPage
participant ExternalItemFieldBase
participant ALMCore
User->>UI: Interacts with UI
UI->>ActionEditPage: Update visibility based on user input
ActionEditPage->>ExternalItemFieldBase: Manage possible values
ExternalItemFieldBase->>ALMCore: Refresh ALM item fields
ALMCore-->>ExternalItemFieldBase: Update selected value key
ExternalItemFieldBase-->>ActionEditPage: Return updated values
ActionEditPage-->>UI: Update UI elements
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/JsonExternalItemField.cs (1)
30-32
: LGTM! Consider adding XML documentation.The addition of
PossibleValueKeys
andSelectedKey
properties implements a proper key-value pattern for managing external item fields. This is particularly useful for scenarios where display values differ from system identifiers.Consider adding XML documentation to clarify the relationship between these properties:
+/// <summary> +/// List of backend identifiers corresponding to each display value in PossibleValues. +/// </summary> public ObservableList<string> PossibleValueKeys { get; set; } +/// <summary> +/// The backend identifier corresponding to the Selected value. +/// </summary> public string SelectedKey { get; set; }Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/BrowserHelper.cs (1)
72-72
: Improve path construction and timestamp formattingWhile using
Path.DirectorySeparatorChar
is correct for cross-platform compatibility, the path construction and timestamp formatting can be improved.Consider this improvement:
- FullFilePath = $"{FullDirectoryPath}{Path.DirectorySeparatorChar}{Filename}_{DateTime.Now.Day.ToString() }_{ DateTime.Now.Month.ToString() }_{ DateTime.Now.Year.ToString() }_{DateTime.Now.Millisecond.ToString()}.har"; + var timestamp = DateTime.Now.ToString("dd_MM_yyyy_fff"); + FullFilePath = Path.Combine(FullDirectoryPath, $"{Filename}_{timestamp}.har");This change:
- Uses
Path.Combine
for safer path construction- Improves timestamp formatting using a standard format string
- Reduces string concatenation
- Makes the code more concise and readable
Ginger/Ginger/External/Katalon/ImportPOMSummaryWizardPage.xaml.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-100
: Consider centralizing wizard state managementThe current implementation distributes wizard button state management across individual pages. Consider introducing a centralized state management approach in the
ImportKatalonObjectRepositoryWizard
class to:
- Define clear rules for when the finish button should be enabled/disabled
- Maintain consistency across all wizard pages
- Reduce the risk of conflicting states
This would make the wizard's behavior more predictable and easier to maintain.
Ginger/Ginger/External/Katalon/ImportPOMFromObjectRepositoryWizardPage.xaml.cs (1)
Line range hint
231-246
: Enhance error handling in ImportPOMsAsyncWhile the error is logged, consider these improvements:
- Re-enable the finish button in the
catch
block to prevent users from getting stuck- Show an error message to the user through the UI
Apply this diff:
catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Error while importing Katalon Object-Repository as Ginger POM", ex); + _wizard.mWizardWindow?.SetFinishButtonEnabled(true); + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticErrorMessage, "Failed to import Katalon Object-Repository: " + ex.Message); }Ginger/Ginger/External/Katalon/ImportKatalonObjectRepositoryWizard.cs (1)
Line range hint
91-116
: Enhance error handling and user feedback in AddPOMs methodWhile the basic error handling is in place, consider these improvements:
- Provide user feedback for failed POM imports
- Handle specific exceptions separately from generic ones
- Consider adding a success/failure summary to the UI
Here's a suggested improvement:
public void AddPOMs() { if (POMViewModels.Count == 0) { return; } try { ImportedPOMCount = 0; + int failedCount = 0; ProcessStarted(); foreach (KatalonConvertedPOMViewModel pomViewModel in POMViewModels.ItemsAsEnumerable()) { try { if (!pomViewModel.Active || !pomViewModel.IsValid()) { continue; } pomViewModel.CommitChanges(); _importTargetDirectory.AddRepositoryItem(pomViewModel.POM); ImportedPOMCount++; } - catch (Exception ex) + catch (InvalidOperationException ex) + { + failedCount++; + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, $"Invalid operation while importing POM {pomViewModel.POM.Name}", ex); + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.ImportError, $"Failed to import {pomViewModel.POM.Name}: {ex.Message}"); + } + catch (Exception ex) { - Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Error while adding imported POM to solution", ex); + failedCount++; + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, $"Unexpected error while importing POM {pomViewModel.POM.Name}", ex); + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.ImportError, $"Failed to import {pomViewModel.POM.Name}: Unexpected error"); } } + + if (failedCount > 0) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.ImportSummary, + $"Import completed with {ImportedPOMCount} successful and {failedCount} failed imports"); + } //clear so that when the Finish method is called, it won't add POMs again POMViewModels.Clear(); } finally { ProcessEnded(); } }Ginger/Ginger/Run/RunSetsExecutionsHistoryPage.xaml.cs (3)
775-779
: Consider enhancing the error message for remote execution deletionWhile the early return prevents incorrect operations, the error message could be more informative by explaining why remote deletion is not supported.
-Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.RemoteExecutionResultsCannotBeAccessed); +Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.RemoteExecutionResultsCannotBeDeleted, "Deletion of remote execution results is not supported as they are managed by the remote server.");
Line range hint
1051-1052
: Consider using decimal instead of float for precise calculationsUsing
float
for division operations could lead to precision issues. Consider usingdecimal
for financial or precise calculations.-float result = MathF.Floor((float)totalEntries / recordCount); +decimal result = Math.Floor((decimal)totalEntries / recordCount);
Line range hint
1144-1151
: Consider consolidating loading indicator methodsThe two methods could be combined into a single method to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
-void GraphQlLoadingVisible() -{ - xGraphQlLoading.Visibility = Visibility.Visible; -} -void GraphQlLoadingCollapsed() -{ - xGraphQlLoading.Visibility = Visibility.Hidden; -} +void SetGraphQlLoadingVisibility(bool isVisible) +{ + xGraphQlLoading.Visibility = isVisible ? Visibility.Visible : Visibility.Hidden; +}Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/RQM/ImportFromRQM.cs (1)
Line range hint
1520-1554
: Check for null when accessing XML nodesIn the
GetCustomAttributes
method, ensure that the code checks for null values when accessing XML nodes likeCustomAttributeListing.GetElementsByTagName("ns2:scope").Item(0)
. This preventsNullReferenceException
if the expected nodes are not present.Apply this diff to add null checks:
string CustomAttributeItemType = string.Empty; var scopeNode = CustomAttributeListing.GetElementsByTagName("ns2:scope").Item(0); + if (scopeNode != null) + { CustomAttributeItemType = scopeNode.InnerText; + }Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Actions/ActInputValue.cs (1)
242-244
: Simplify null value comparisonThe null check can be simplified using string.Equals with StringComparison.
- ((this.Value == null && string.IsNullOrEmpty(other.Value)) - || this.Value == other.Value); + string.Equals(this.Value, other.Value, StringComparison.Ordinal);Ginger/GingerCoreNET/LiteDBFolder/LiteDbConnector.cs (1)
Line range hint
203-216
: Critical: Incorrect file path usage in GetImage methodThe method is incorrectly using the connection string as the target file path. This could lead to file creation at an invalid location or potential security issues.
- using (FileStream fs = File.Create(this.ConnectionString.ToString())) + using (FileStream fs = File.Create(Path.Combine(Path.GetTempPath(), Path.GetFileName(imagePath)))) { var file = db.FileStorage.Download(imagePath, fs); }Ginger/Ginger/Environments/GingerOpsEnvWizardLib/AddGingerOpsEnvPage.xaml.cs (1)
167-186
: LGTM! Improved null handling logic.The changes enhance robustness by properly checking for null before accessing SelectedItems.Count. The added else block provides good user feedback.
Fix the indentation at line 169 to match the surrounding code:
- if (xEnvironmentComboBox.SelectedItems.Count > 0) + if (xEnvironmentComboBox.SelectedItems.Count > 0)Ginger/Ginger/Actions/ActionEditPages/ActBrowserElementEditPage.xaml.cs (1)
211-211
: Remove unnecessary whitespace.This line contains only whitespace and should be removed.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ActionsLib/ActScript.cs (1)
300-303
: Consider improving temporary file handling for executables.While the code adds support for .exe files, consider the following improvements:
- The
.log
extension might not be appropriate for all executables. Consider using a more suitable extension or making it configurable.- The temporary file creation could benefit from using a dedicated helper method that ensures proper cleanup.
Consider this approach:
-else if (calculatedScriptInterpreter != null && calculatedScriptInterpreter.ToLower().Contains(".exe")) -{ - TempFileName = CreateTempFile("log"); -} +else if (calculatedScriptInterpreter != null && calculatedScriptInterpreter.ToLower().Contains(".exe")) +{ + // Use a configurable extension or derive from the executable type + string extension = GetAppropriateExtension(calculatedScriptInterpreter); + TempFileName = CreateTempFile(extension); +}Add this helper method:
private string GetAppropriateExtension(string interpreter) { // Add logic to determine appropriate extension based on the executable return "tmp"; // Default to .tmp instead of .log }Ginger/Ginger/ALM/Repository/OctaneRepository.cs (1)
172-172
: Consider using a constant for the "RunSet" value.While the null check and case-insensitive comparison are good improvements, the magic string "RunSet" should be defined as a constant for better maintainability.
Consider this approach:
+private const string RUN_SET_LEVEL = "RunSet"; -if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(businessFlow.ALMTestSetLevel) && businessFlow.ALMTestSetLevel.Equals("RunSet", StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase)) +if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(businessFlow.ALMTestSetLevel) && businessFlow.ALMTestSetLevel.Equals(RUN_SET_LEVEL, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase))Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Generic/ALMCore.cs (1)
382-404
: Consider refactoring for better maintainability.While the logic is correct, the code could be more concise and easier to maintain by extracting the value-key synchronization logic into a separate method.
Consider this approach:
+private void SyncSelectedValueAndKey(ExternalItemFieldBase currentField, ExternalItemFieldBase latestField) +{ + int selectedElementIndex = latestField.PossibleValues.IndexOf(currentField.SelectedValue); + if (selectedElementIndex != -1) + { + currentField.SelectedValue = latestField.PossibleValues[selectedElementIndex]; + currentField.SelectedValueKey = latestField.PossibleValueKeys?.Count > 0 + ? latestField.PossibleValueKeys[selectedElementIndex] + : string.Empty; + } + else + { + currentField.SelectedValue = latestField.SelectedValue; + currentField.SelectedValueKey = latestField.SelectedValueKey; + } +} -int SelectedElementIndex = latestField.PossibleValues.IndexOf(currentField.SelectedValue); -if (SelectedElementIndex != -1) -{ - currentField.SelectedValue = latestField.PossibleValues[SelectedElementIndex]; - currentField.SelectedValueKey = latestField.PossibleValueKeys != null && latestField.PossibleValueKeys.Count > 0 ? latestField.PossibleValueKeys[SelectedElementIndex] : string.Empty; -} -else -{ - currentField.SelectedValue = latestField.SelectedValue; - currentField.SelectedValueKey = latestField.SelectedValueKey; -} +SyncSelectedValueAndKey(currentField, latestField);Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Playwright/PlaywrightBrowserTab.cs (1)
Line range hint
751-761
: Consider adding null check for BrowserHelperThe network monitoring code should verify that
_BrowserHelper
is not null before accessing its methods.if (_BrowserHelper.ShouldMonitorAllUrls() || _BrowserHelper.ShouldMonitorUrl(request.Url)) +if (_BrowserHelper?.ShouldMonitorAllUrls() == true || _BrowserHelper?.ShouldMonitorUrl(request.Url) == true)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GeneralLib/General.cs (2)
753-753
: Consider enhancing error handling in value mapping.The value mapping logic could be improved with more robust error handling:
- Add null checks for
externalItemField
andexistingField
before accessing their properties- Consider using string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace() instead of IsNullOrEmpty() for more thorough validation
- string value = ""; - string valuekey = ""; + string value = string.Empty; + string valuekey = string.Empty; + if (externalItemField == null) + { + throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(externalItemField)); + } if (existingField == null) { if (externalItemField.Mandatory) { - if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(externalItemField.SelectedValue)) + if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(externalItemField.SelectedValue))Also applies to: 793-793
814-833
: Add input validation and documentation to UpdateSelectedValueKey method.The method could benefit from:
- Input parameter validation
- XML documentation for better IntelliSense support
- Consistent string comparison handling
+ /// <summary> + /// Updates the selected value key for a given value and project. + /// </summary> + /// <param name="SelectedValue">The selected value to find the key for</param> + /// <param name="ProjectGuid">The project GUID to search within</param> + /// <returns>The value key if found, empty string otherwise</returns> public string UpdateSelectedValueKey(string SelectedValue, string ProjectGuid) { + if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(ProjectGuid)) + { + throw new ArgumentException("ProjectGuid cannot be null or empty", nameof(ProjectGuid)); + } + string ValueKey = string.Empty; if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(SelectedValue)) { var existingField = WorkSpace.Instance.Solution.ExternalItemsFields .FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name.Equals(SelectedValue, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase) && x.ProjectGuid == ProjectGuid); - if (existingField != null) + if (existingField?.SelectedValue != null) { - if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(SelectedValue)) - { - ValueKey = existingField.SelectedValueKey; - } + ValueKey = existingField.SelectedValueKey ?? string.Empty; } } return ValueKey; }Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/BusinessFlowLib/BusinessFlow.cs (1)
2066-2067
: Consider performance impact of LoadLinkedActivities.The addition of LoadLinkedActivities() before comparison is necessary for accurate equality checks, but could impact performance for large business flows.
Consider:
- Adding lazy loading optimization for linked activities
- Documenting the performance implications in method comments
- Adding progress tracking for large business flows
Ginger/Ginger/Actions/ActionEditPage.xaml.cs (2)
720-720
: Improve documentation of the temporary fix and create tracking issue.The comment indicates a temporary workaround for event handling during state restoration. Consider:
- Enhancing the comment to better explain:
- The specific issue being worked around
- Why events cause exceptions during restoration
- The intended permanent solution
- Creating a tracking issue to implement a proper fix for handling events during state restoration.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of a proper fix?
Line range hint
1017-1105
: Enhance maintainability of column definitions.The column definitions are currently hardcoded in a dictionary. Consider:
- Moving column definitions to a configuration or constant
- Using an enum or strongly-typed keys for column names to prevent typos and improve maintainability
- Adding validation for column names to ensure they match the
ActReturnValue.Fields
valuesHere's a suggested refactor:
-columnMultiSelectComboBox.ItemsSource = new Dictionary<string, object> - { - { "Description", ActReturnValue.Fields.Description }, - { "Path", ActReturnValue.Fields.Path }, - { "Actual Value", ActReturnValue.Fields.Actual }, - { "Expected Value", ActReturnValue.Fields.Expected }, - { "Store To", ActReturnValue.Fields.StoreTo } - }; +private static class OutputColumns +{ + public static readonly Dictionary<string, object> Definitions = new() + { + { nameof(ActReturnValue.Fields.Description), ActReturnValue.Fields.Description }, + { nameof(ActReturnValue.Fields.Path), ActReturnValue.Fields.Path }, + { nameof(ActReturnValue.Fields.Actual), ActReturnValue.Fields.Actual }, + { nameof(ActReturnValue.Fields.Expected), ActReturnValue.Fields.Expected }, + { nameof(ActReturnValue.Fields.StoreTo), ActReturnValue.Fields.StoreTo } + }; +} + +columnMultiSelectComboBox.ItemsSource = OutputColumns.Definitions;Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/AddActionMenu/WindowExplorer/Common/ControlActionsPage_New.xaml.cs (1)
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
The commented-out code block should be restored
The commented-out
Action_PropertyChanged
handler contains essential UI update logic that is not implemented elsewhere in the codebase. This code is responsible for:
- Updating execution status icon
- Managing run button state
- Handling error and execution info display
- Processing return values
The search results show:
- No alternative implementation of this status change handling exists
- The UI elements (
xExecutionStatusIcon
,xRunActBtn
) referenced in the commented code are still present and used exclusively in this file- No other components are handling Act status changes in a similar way
Restore this code to maintain proper UI feedback during action execution.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-607
: Consider architectural improvementsThe class has the following architectural concerns:
- Violation of Single Responsibility Principle - handling both UI interactions and business logic
- Large commented-out code block (
Action_PropertyChanged
) that might contain important UI update logicConsider:
- Splitting the class into separate UI and business logic components
- Moving the action handling logic to a dedicated service class
- Either removing or restoring the commented-out code block based on its relevance
Let's verify if the commented-out code is still relevant:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the PropertyChanged event is used elsewhere in the codebase rg -A 5 "PropertyChanged.*Act\.Status"Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check if the commented-out functionality is implemented elsewhere ast-grep --pattern 'PropertyChanged += $handler' # Also check for similar status update patterns rg -g '*.cs' -B 2 -A 2 'xExecutionStatusIcon.Status' # Check for similar UI update patterns rg -g '*.cs' -B 2 -A 2 'xRunActBtn.IsEnabled' # Check if there are other files handling Act status changes rg -g '*.cs' 'Act.*Status.*Changed'Length of output: 8846
🛑 Comments failed to post (12)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/BrowserHelper.cs (1)
49-49: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve readability and null safety of URL monitoring logic
The current condition is complex and could benefit from better readability and null safety checks.
Consider refactoring like this:
- && _act.UpdateOperationInputValues.Any(x => ( !string.IsNullOrEmpty(x.ValueForDriver) ? requestUrl.ToLower().Contains(x.ValueForDriver.ToLower()) : (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(x.Value) && requestUrl.ToLower().Contains(x.Value.ToLower())))); + && _act.UpdateOperationInputValues.Any(x => ShouldMonitorUrlForInput(x, requestUrl)); + + private bool ShouldMonitorUrlForInput(InputValue input, string requestUrl) + { + if (input == null || requestUrl == null) + return false; + + // First try ValueForDriver, fall back to Value if not available + var valueToCheck = !string.IsNullOrEmpty(input.ValueForDriver) + ? input.ValueForDriver + : input.Value; + + return !string.IsNullOrEmpty(valueToCheck) + && requestUrl.Contains(valueToCheck, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase); + }This refactoring:
- Improves readability by extracting the logic to a dedicated method
- Adds null safety checks
- Uses modern string comparison methods
- Makes the fallback logic more explicit
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Ginger/Ginger/External/Katalon/ImportPOMSummaryWizardPage.xaml.cs (1)
52-56: 💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Finish button should be enabled based on ImportedPOMCount
The current implementation unconditionally enables the finish button, but the codebase shows that:
- Other wizard pages (like
SelectObjectRepositoryFolderWizardPage
andImportPOMFromObjectRepositoryWizardPage
) disable the finish button on activation- The page already has access to
ImportedPOMCount
and listens to its changes viaUpdateSummary
- The wizard maintains
ImportedPOMCount
which is incremented when POMs are successfully importedSuggested fix:
if (e.EventType == EventType.Active) { - _wizard.mWizardWindow?.SetFinishButtonEnabled(true); + _wizard.mWizardWindow?.SetFinishButtonEnabled(_wizard.ImportedPOMCount > 0); }🔗 Analysis chain
Verify finish button enablement conditions
The unconditional enabling of the finish button when the page becomes active might lead to premature completion if the import data isn't ready or valid.
Consider these improvements:
- Add validation before enabling the finish button:
if (e.EventType == EventType.Active) { - _wizard.mWizardWindow?.SetFinishButtonEnabled(true); + _wizard.mWizardWindow?.SetFinishButtonEnabled(_wizard.ImportedPOMCount > 0); }
- Extract event handling into separate methods for better maintainability:
public void WizardEvent(WizardEventArgs e) { - if (e.EventType == EventType.Active) - { - _wizard.mWizardWindow?.SetFinishButtonEnabled(true); - } - else if (e.EventType == EventType.Prev && _wizard.GetCurrentPage().Page == this) - { - e.CancelEvent = true; - } + switch (e.EventType) + { + case EventType.Active: + HandleActiveEvent(); + break; + case EventType.Prev: + HandlePrevEvent(e); + break; + } } + +private void HandleActiveEvent() +{ + _wizard.mWizardWindow?.SetFinishButtonEnabled(_wizard.ImportedPOMCount > 0); +} + +private void HandlePrevEvent(WizardEventArgs e) +{ + if (_wizard.GetCurrentPage().Page == this) + { + e.CancelEvent = true; + } +}Let's verify the current behavior:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar patterns in other wizard pages to understand the standard practice rg -t cs "EventType.Active.*SetFinishButtonEnabled" --no-headingLength of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first check how SetFinishButtonEnabled is used across the codebase rg -t cs "SetFinishButtonEnabled" -B2 -A2 # Also check for any ImportedPOMCount property or similar validation rg -t cs "ImportedPOMCount" -B2 -A2 # Look for other wizard event handlers ast-grep --pattern 'public void WizardEvent(WizardEventArgs $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 13341
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/SolutionRepository.cs (1)
693-699: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve unique filename generation to ensure thread safety and avoid potential issues
The current logic for generating unique filenames uses a counter with
Random.Shared.Next
, which may not be thread-safe and could introduce compatibility issues in multi-threaded environments. Additionally, the use ofRandom.Shared
requires .NET 6 or higher. Consider usingGuid.NewGuid()
orPath.GetRandomFileName()
for generating unique filenames in a thread-safe manner.Apply this diff to enhance the filename generation:
while (File.Exists(filefullPath)) { if (Nameex != "") { filefullPath = filefullPath.Replace(Nameex, ""); } - counter++; - Nameex = "~" + counter; - filefullPath = filefullPath.Replace(ext, Nameex + ext); - if (counter > 100) - { - counter = Random.Shared.Next(minValue: 101, maxValue: 10000); - } + Nameex = "~" + Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"); + filefullPath = filefullPath.Replace(ext, Nameex + ext); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.Nameex = "~" + Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N"); filefullPath = filefullPath.Replace(ext, Nameex + ext);
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Database/NoSqlBase/GingerHbase.cs (3)
915-916:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect list initialization syntax
The list
columnList
is initialized incorrectly using[]
, which is not valid in C#. Usenew List<string>()
to initialize the list properly.Apply this diff to fix the initialization:
- List<string> columnList = []; + List<string> columnList = new List<string>();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.List<string> columnList = new List<string>(); HBaseClient actionClient = new(ClCredential, requestOption);
867-898:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential null reference when accessing
tables.name
If an exception occurs during
ListTablesAsync
, thetables
object may remain uninitialized, leading to aNullReferenceException
when accessingtables.name
. Ensure thattables
is not null before iterating over it.Apply this diff to check for null references:
getTablesTask.Wait(); + if (tables?.name != null) + { foreach (var table in tables.name) { HBTableList.Add(table); } + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.List<string> HBTableList = []; var ConnectionUri = new Uri(this.connectionUrl); ClusterCredentials ClCredential = new(ConnectionUri, this.userName, this.password); client = new HBaseClient(ClCredential, requestOption); try { TableList tables = new(); Task getTablesTask = Task.Run(() => { try { tables = client.ListTablesAsync().Result; } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "Unable to connect to Hbase and get table list ", ex); } }); getTablesTask.Wait(); if (tables?.name != null) { foreach (var table in tables.name) { HBTableList.Add(table); } } } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Unable to connect to Hbase", ex);
912-948: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor asynchronous method to use
async
/await
correctlyThe
GetColumnList
method is declared asasync
but usesTask.Run
with blocking calls like.Result
and.Wait()
. This can cause deadlocks and negates the benefits of asynchronous programming. Refactor the code to useawait
directly on asynchronous calls.Apply this diff to refactor the method:
public override async Task<List<string>> GetColumnList(string Tablename) { var ConnectionUri = new Uri(Db.DatabaseOperations.TNSCalculated); ClusterCredentials ClCredential = new(ConnectionUri, Db.DatabaseOperations.UserCalculated, Db.DatabaseOperations.PassCalculated); CellSet next; - List<string> columnList = []; + List<string> columnList = new List<string>(); HBaseClient actionClient = new(ClCredential, requestOption); Scanner scanner; ScannerInformation scanInfo = null; scanner = new Scanner(); - Task getTablesTask = Task.Run(() => - { try { - scanInfo = actionClient.CreateScannerAsync(Tablename, scanner, requestOption).Result; - while ((next = actionClient.ScannerGetNextAsync(scanInfo, requestOption).Result) != null) + scanInfo = await actionClient.CreateScannerAsync(Tablename, scanner, requestOption); + while ((next = await actionClient.ScannerGetNextAsync(scanInfo, requestOption)) != null) { foreach (CellSet.Row row in next.rows) { string rowKey = _encoding.GetString(row.key); List<Cell> cells = row.values; foreach (Cell c in cells) { columnList.Add(ExtractColumnName(c.column)); } break; } } } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "Unable to connect to Hbase and get Column list ", ex); } - }); - - getTablesTask.Wait(); return columnList; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.var ConnectionUri = new Uri(Db.DatabaseOperations.TNSCalculated); ClusterCredentials ClCredential = new(ConnectionUri, Db.DatabaseOperations.UserCalculated, Db.DatabaseOperations.PassCalculated); CellSet next; List<string> columnList = new List<string>(); HBaseClient actionClient = new(ClCredential, requestOption); Scanner scanner; ScannerInformation scanInfo = null; scanner = new Scanner(); try { scanInfo = await actionClient.CreateScannerAsync(Tablename, scanner, requestOption); while ((next = await actionClient.ScannerGetNextAsync(scanInfo, requestOption)) != null) { foreach (CellSet.Row row in next.rows) { string rowKey = _encoding.GetString(row.key); List<Cell> cells = row.values; foreach (Cell c in cells) { columnList.Add(ExtractColumnName(c.column)); } break; } } } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "Unable to connect to Hbase and get Column list ", ex); } return columnList;
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/RQM/ImportFromRQM.cs (1)
915-918:
⚠️ Potential issueInitialize
PossibleValueKeys
before useThe list
PossibleValueKeys
is being used without ensuring it is initialized, which could cause aNullReferenceException
. Initialize the list before adding items.Apply this diff to initialize
PossibleValueKeys
:itemField.PossibleValues = jsonItemField.PossibleValues; + itemField.PossibleValueKeys = jsonItemField.PossibleValueKeys ?? new List<string>(); itemField.ToUpdate = jsonItemField.ToUpdate;
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/ALMLib/ExternalItemFieldBase.cs (2)
148-170:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd bounds check before accessing PossibleValueKeys
The method needs additional validation to prevent potential IndexOutOfRangeException when accessing mPossibleValueKeys[indexofValue].
public string UpdateSelectedValueKey(string SelectedValue) { string ValueKey = string.Empty; if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(SelectedValue)) { - if (mPossibleValues.Count != mPossibleValueKeys.Count) + if (mPossibleValues == null || mPossibleValueKeys == null || + mPossibleValues.Count != mPossibleValueKeys.Count) { return mSelectedValueKey ?? string.Empty; } int indexofValue = mPossibleValues.IndexOf(SelectedValue); - if(indexofValue != -1) + if(indexofValue != -1 && indexofValue < mPossibleValueKeys.Count) { ValueKey = mPossibleValueKeys[indexofValue]; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public string UpdateSelectedValueKey(string SelectedValue) { string ValueKey = string.Empty; if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(SelectedValue)) { if (mPossibleValues == null || mPossibleValueKeys == null || mPossibleValues.Count != mPossibleValueKeys.Count) { return mSelectedValueKey ?? string.Empty; } int indexofValue = mPossibleValues.IndexOf(SelectedValue); if(indexofValue != -1 && indexofValue < mPossibleValueKeys.Count) { ValueKey = mPossibleValueKeys[indexofValue]; } else { ValueKey = mSelectedValueKey; } } return ValueKey; }
85-97: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add null check for PossibleValueKeys initialization
The property initialization should include a null check to prevent potential NullReferenceException.
- ObservableList<string> mPossibleValueKeys = []; + ObservableList<string> mPossibleValueKeys = new ObservableList<string>();Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/LiteDBFolder/LiteDbConnector.cs (1)
168-174: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for updateData list
The code should validate the input list before processing.
+ if (updateData == null || !updateData.Any()) + { + return; + } foreach (T data in updateData) { if (data is LiteDbReportBase baseObj && baseObj._id == null)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (updateData == null || !updateData.Any()) { return; } foreach (T data in updateData) { if (data is LiteDbReportBase baseObj && baseObj._id == null) { baseObj._id = ObjectId.NewObjectId(); } }
Ginger/GingerCoreNETUnitTest/LinuxTransformationTests/ActScriptTests.cs (1)
375-451:
⚠️ Potential issueFix duplicate ValueExpression initialization in ActScriptTestWithBFVariableInterpreterPath.
The test methods are well-structured and properly documented. However, there's a duplicate ValueExpression initialization at line 401 that should be removed as it overrides the one set during object initialization.
Remove the duplicate initialization:
- actScript.ValueExpression = new ValueExpression(actScript, "");
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Test to verify the script interpreter path using a business flow variable. /// </summary> [Ignore] [TestMethod] public void ActScriptTestWithBFVariableInterpreterPath() { if (!isOSWindows) { return; } mGR.CurrentBusinessFlow.Variables.Add(new VariableString() { Name = "BF_TestPath", InitialStringValue = TestResources.GetTestResourcesFolder("Files") }); //Arrange ActScript actScript = new ActScript { ScriptInterpreterType = ActScript.eScriptInterpreterType.Other, ScriptInterpreter = "{Var Name=BF_TestPath}", ScriptCommand = ActScript.eScriptAct.Script, ScriptName = TestResources.GetTestResourcesFile(Path.Combine(@"Files", @"ScriptWithoutOutput.vbs")), Active = true, AddNewReturnParams = true, ValueExpression = new ValueExpression(mGR.GingerRunner.ProjEnvironment, mGR.CurrentBusinessFlow, null) }; //Act string calculatedScriptInterpreter = actScript.ScriptInterpreter; if (actScript.ValueExpression != null) { actScript.ValueExpression.Value = actScript.ScriptInterpreter; calculatedScriptInterpreter = actScript.ValueExpression.ValueCalculated; } //Assert Assert.AreEqual(calculatedScriptInterpreter, TestResources.GetTestResourcesFolder("Files")); } /// <summary> /// Test to verify the script interpreter path using an activity variable. /// </summary> [TestMethod] public void ActScriptTestWithActVariableInterpreterPath() { if (!isOSWindows) { return; } mGR.CurrentBusinessFlow.CurrentActivity.Variables.Add(new VariableString() { Name = "Act_TestPath", InitialStringValue = TestResources.GetTestResourcesFolder("Files") }); //Arrange ActScript actScript = new ActScript { ScriptInterpreterType = ActScript.eScriptInterpreterType.Other, ScriptInterpreter = "{Var Name=Act_TestPath}", ScriptCommand = ActScript.eScriptAct.Script, ScriptName = TestResources.GetTestResourcesFile(Path.Combine(@"Files", @"ScriptWithoutOutput.vbs")), Active = true, AddNewReturnParams = true, ValueExpression = new ValueExpression(mGR.GingerRunner.ProjEnvironment, mGR.CurrentBusinessFlow, null) }; //Act string calculatedScriptInterpreter = actScript.ScriptInterpreter; if (actScript.ValueExpression != null) { actScript.ValueExpression.Value = actScript.ScriptInterpreter; calculatedScriptInterpreter = actScript.ValueExpression.ValueCalculated; } var a = TestResources.GetTestResourcesFolder("Files"); //Assert Assert.AreEqual(calculatedScriptInterpreter, a); }
Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/AddActionMenu/WindowExplorer/Common/ControlActionsPage_New.xaml.cs (1)
229-238:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null checks and default case handling
The current implementation has the following concerns:
- Missing null check for
mElementInfo
before accessing its properties- No default case handling for other action types
- Inconsistent indentation in the code block
Consider applying this diff:
- if(DefaultAction is ActUIElement) - { - (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementData = mElementInfo.GetElementData(); - DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName); - } - else if(DefaultAction is ActBrowserElement) - { - DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActBrowserElement).ControlAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName); - } + if (mElementInfo == null) + { + throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(mElementInfo), "Element info cannot be null"); + } + + if (DefaultAction is ActUIElement uiElement) + { + uiElement.ElementData = mElementInfo.GetElementData(); + DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", + uiElement.ElementAction, + mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), + mElementInfo.ElementName); + } + else if (DefaultAction is ActBrowserElement browserElement) + { + DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", + browserElement.ControlAction, + mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), + mElementInfo.ElementName); + } + else + { + DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("Unknown action type for {0} - {1}", + mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), + mElementInfo.ElementName); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (mElementInfo == null) { throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(mElementInfo), "Element info cannot be null"); } if (DefaultAction is ActUIElement uiElement) { uiElement.ElementData = mElementInfo.GetElementData(); DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", uiElement.ElementAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName); } else if (DefaultAction is ActBrowserElement browserElement) { DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", browserElement.ControlAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName); } else { DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("Unknown action type for {0} - {1}", mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName); }
Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests
Activity
andBusinessFlow
classes.ActScriptTests
.Style