-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Playwright Defect fix D43161_D43162_D44142_D44141 #4017
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing dialog management and network logging capabilities within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Playwright/PlaywrightBrowserTab.cs (3)
75-75
: Consider initializingisDialogDismiss
in the constructor.It's generally a good practice to initialize instance variables in the constructor to ensure they have a valid initial state. Consider moving the initialization of
isDialogDismiss
to the constructor.
845-845
: Consider resetting dialog after accepting.After accepting the dialog, consider setting
dialogs
to null to indicate that the dialog has been handled and is no longer available for interaction.
869-869
: Consider resetting dialog after dismissing.After dismissing the dialog, consider setting
dialogs
to null to indicate that the dialog has been handled and is no longer available for interaction.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/BrowserHelper.cs (1)
54-54
: UsePath.Combine
for constructing file paths.Instead of manually concatenating directory separators, consider using
Path.Combine
to construct theFullFilePath
. This ensures cross-platform compatibility and improves readability.Apply this diff to use
Path.Combine
:-FullFilePath = $"{FullDirectoryPath}{Path.DirectorySeparatorChar}{Filename}_{DateTime.Now.Day.ToString() }_{ DateTime.Now.Month.ToString() }_{ DateTime.Now.Year.ToString() }_{DateTime.Now.Millisecond.ToString()}.har"; +FullFilePath = Path.Combine(FullDirectoryPath, $"{Filename}_{DateTime.Now.ToString("dd_MM_yyyy_fff")}.har");Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/AddActionMenu/WindowExplorer/Common/ControlActionsPage_New.xaml.cs (1)
229-237
: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for unsupported action types.The type-specific handling for setting properties is well-structured and improves type safety. However, consider adding an else clause to handle unsupported action types gracefully.
Consider adding error handling:
if(DefaultAction is ActUIElement) { (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementData = mElementInfo.GetElementData(); DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName); } else if(DefaultAction is ActBrowserElement) { DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActBrowserElement).ControlAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName); } +else +{ + throw new InvalidOperationException($"Unsupported action type: {DefaultAction.GetType().Name}"); +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/AddActionMenu/WindowExplorer/Common/ControlActionsPage_New.xaml.cs
(1 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/ActionHandlers/ActUIElementHandler.cs
(1 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/BrowserHelper.cs
(1 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/IBrowserTab.cs
(1 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Playwright/PlaywrightBrowserTab.cs
(8 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Playwright/PlaywrightBrowserTab.cs (4)
813-813
: LGTM!
The OnPlaywrightDialog
method looks good. It handles the dialog based on the isDialogDismiss
flag and stores the dialog for later interaction if needed.
920-921
: Verify setting isDialogDismiss
after accepting dialog.
Setting isDialogDismiss
to true after accepting the dialog with custom text looks good. This ensures that subsequent dialogs will be automatically dismissed.
935-938
: LGTM!
The StartListenDialogsAsync
method implementation is straightforward and sets isDialogDismiss
to false, allowing for manual handling of dialogs.
819-827
: Verify dialog handling logic.
The dialog handling logic looks correct. It dismisses the dialog if isDialogDismiss
is true, otherwise it stores the dialog in the dialogs
variable for later interaction.
To verify the dialog handling:
✅ Verification successful
Dialog handling implementation is correct and properly integrated
The dialog handling implementation is well-structured and works as intended:
- The dialog handler is properly registered/unregistered via
_playwrightPage.Dialog += OnPlaywrightDialog
- The
isDialogDismiss
flag is a class-level variable that controls dialog behavior - When
isDialogDismiss
is true, dialogs are automatically dismissed usingDismissAsync()
- When
isDialogDismiss
is false, the dialog is stored in thedialogs
variable for later handling - The implementation includes proper error handling with try-catch blocks
- The class provides methods to accept/dismiss dialogs which appropriately reset the
isDialogDismiss
flag
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify dialog handling based on isDialogDismiss flag
# Test 1: Check if dialog is dismissed when isDialogDismiss is true
isDialogDismiss=true
OnPlaywrightDialog # Simulate dialog event
# Expected: Dialog should be dismissed
# Test 2: Check if dialog is stored when isDialogDismiss is false
isDialogDismiss=false
OnPlaywrightDialog # Simulate dialog event
# Expected: Dialog should be stored in dialogs variable
Length of output: 307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the dialog handling implementation and its usage
rg -A 10 "OnPlaywrightDialog" --type cs
# Also check for any dialog-related tests
rg -A 10 "isDialogDismiss" --type cs
# Look for dialog handling patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'async Task OnPlaywrightDialog($_) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 10396
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs (2)
Line range hint 751-756
: LGTM!
The OnNetworkRequestSent
method correctly checks if the request URL should be monitored based on the configured criteria and adds the request details to the networkRequestLogList
.
Line range hint 11096-11102
: LGTM!
The updated OnNetworkRequestSent
method looks good. It checks if the request URL should be monitored based on the configured criteria and adds the request details to the networkRequestLogList
.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/IBrowserTab.cs (1)
95-96
: LGTM!
The addition of the StartListenDialogsAsync
method to the IBrowserTab
interface is a good enhancement for dialog handling functionality.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/ActionHandlers/ActUIElementHandler.cs (1)
696-696
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding cleanup for the dialog listener.
While initializing the dialog listener before the async click is good, consider cleaning up the listener after the operation to prevent potential memory leaks or unexpected behavior in subsequent operations.
Consider wrapping the operation in a try-finally block:
private async Task HandleAsyncClickAsync()
{
- await _browserTab.StartListenDialogsAsync();
+ try
+ {
+ await _browserTab.StartListenDialogsAsync();
+ string script = "element => setTimeout(function() { element.click(); }, 100);";
+ IBrowserElement element = await GetFirstMatchingElementAsync();
+ await element.ExecuteJavascriptAsync(script);
+ }
+ finally
+ {
+ await _browserTab.StopListenDialogsAsync();
+ }
- string script = "element => setTimeout(function() { element.click(); }, 100);";
- IBrowserElement element = await GetFirstMatchingElementAsync();
- await element.ExecuteJavascriptAsync(script);
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs (2)
8665-8665
: Initialize _BrowserHelper earlierThe _BrowserHelper field is initialized here during StartMonitoringNetworkLog, but it would be better to initialize it in the constructor or when the driver starts to ensure it's available throughout the lifetime of the driver.
Consider moving the initialization to the constructor:
public class SeleniumDriver : GingerWebDriver, IVirtualDriver, IWindowExplorer, IVisualTestingDriver, IXPath, IPOM, IRecord { protected IWebDriver Driver; BrowserHelper _BrowserHelper; public SeleniumDriver() { + _BrowserHelper = new BrowserHelper(); } }
Line range hint
1-11500
: Consider splitting large class into smaller componentsThe SeleniumDriver class is quite large (over 11k lines) which makes it hard to maintain. Consider splitting it into smaller, focused components using composition.
Suggested refactoring:
- Extract network monitoring functionality into a separate NetworkMonitor class
- Extract browser configuration logic into a BrowserConfigurator class
- Extract element location logic into an ElementLocator class
- Use composition to combine these components in SeleniumDriver
This would improve:
- Code organization and readability
- Testability of individual components
- Separation of concerns
- Maintainability
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/BrowserHelper.cs
(2 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs
(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/BrowserHelper.cs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Ginger/Ginger/Actions/ActionEditPages/ActBrowserElementEditPage.xaml.cs (2)
192-197
: LGTM! Consider removing extra blank lineThe implementation for
SetAlertBoxText
follows the established pattern and correctly configures the UI elements. However, there's an unnecessary blank line at line 196 that could be removed for better readability.else if(mAct.ControlAction == ActBrowserElement.eControlAction.SetAlertBoxText) { xValueGrid.Visibility = System.Windows.Visibility.Visible; xValueLabel.Content = "Value:"; - }
211-211
: Remove unnecessary blank lineThis blank line doesn't serve any purpose and should be removed to maintain consistent formatting.
-
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Ginger/Ginger/Actions/ActionEditPages/ActBrowserElementEditPage.xaml.cs
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Ginger/Ginger/Actions/ActionEditPages/ActBrowserElementEditPage.xaml.cs (1)
192-197
: Verify integration with ActUIElementHandler
The UI changes for SetAlertBoxText
look good, but let's ensure proper integration with the dialog handling system.
Let's verify the implementation:
✅ Verification successful
SetAlertBoxText action is properly integrated
The implementation is complete and properly integrated across the codebase:
- The enum value is properly declared in
ActBrowserElement.eControlAction
- The action is handled in multiple browser drivers:
- Selenium implementation in
SeleniumDriver.cs
usingDriver.SwitchTo().Alert().SendKeys()
- Playwright implementation referenced in
PlaywrightDriver.cs
- Generic handler in
ActBrowserElementHandler.cs
viaHandleSetMessageBoxTextOperation
- Selenium implementation in
- UI integration is correctly implemented in
ActBrowserElementEditPage.xaml.cs
- Basic test coverage exists in
WebDriverUnitTestCase.cs
The implementation follows the same pattern as other alert-related actions (AcceptMessageBox, DismissMessageBox, GetMessageBoxText) and is properly integrated into the browser action handling system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the SetAlertBoxText action implementation and test coverage
# Check for the enum declaration
echo "Checking for SetAlertBoxText enum declaration..."
rg -p "enum.*eControlAction" -A 30
# Check for handler implementation
echo "Checking for SetAlertBoxText handler implementation..."
rg -p "SetAlertBoxText.*case" -A 5
# Check for test coverage
echo "Checking for test coverage..."
fd -e cs -e vb --exec rg -p "SetAlertBoxText.*Test"
Length of output: 10492
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the implementation of SetAlertBoxText handling in browser-related files
# Check for SetAlertBoxText implementation in browser handlers
echo "Checking for SetAlertBoxText implementation..."
rg -p "SetAlertBoxText" -B 5 -A 10
# Check for alert-related methods that might handle this action
echo "Checking for alert handling methods..."
rg -p "Alert.*handle|handle.*Alert" -B 5 -A 10
# Look for any alert-related test files
echo "Looking for alert-related test files..."
fd -e cs --exec rg -l "Alert.*Test|Test.*Alert"
Length of output: 11850
Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor