Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Playwright IFrame fixed #4031

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

prashelke
Copy link
Contributor

@prashelke prashelke commented Dec 10, 2024

Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:

  • PR description and commit message should describe the changes done in this PR
  • Verify the PR is pointing to correct branch i.e. Release or Beta branch if the code fix is for specific release , else point it to master
  • Latest Code from master or specific release branch is merged to your branch
  • No unwanted\commented\junk code is included
  • No new warning upon build solution
  • Code Summary\Comments are added to my code which explains what my code is doing
  • Existing unit test cases are passed
  • New Unit tests are added for your development
  • Sanity Tests are successfully executed for New and Existing Functionality
  • Verify that changes are compatible with all relevant browsers and platforms.
  • After creating pull request there should not be any conflicts
  • Resolve all Codacy comments
  • Builds and checks are passed before PR is sent for review
  • Resolve code review comments
  • Update the Help Library document to match any feature changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced action handling logic with improved description assignment based on action type.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Refined error handling for action descriptions to ensure accuracy.
  • Style

    • Minor formatting adjustments for improved code readability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the ControlActionsPage_New class within the Ginger.WindowExplorer namespace. A new method, FormatActionDescription, has been introduced to centralize the logic for generating the Description property of DefaultAction, which is now set based on whether it is an ActUIElement or ActBrowserElement. The SetPlatformBasedUIUpdates method has also been updated to utilize this new method. Minor formatting adjustments were made for improved readability, while the overall control flow and behavior of the class remain intact.

Changes

File Change Summary
Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/AddActionMenu/WindowExplorer/Common/ControlActionsPage_New.xaml.cs Added FormatActionDescription method, updated DefaultAction.Description assignment, and modified SetPlatformBasedUIUpdates method. Minor formatting adjustments made.

Possibly related PRs

  • Playwright Defect fix D43161_D43162_D44142_D44141 #4017: This PR directly modifies the ControlActionsPage_New class, specifically the SetPlatformBasedUIUpdates method, which aligns with the changes made in the main PR regarding the handling of DefaultAction types and their descriptions.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
A new action menu brightens the day.
With checks for the types, so clear and neat,
Descriptions now dance, oh what a treat!
Hopping through logic, so clever and spry,
We celebrate changes as we leap high! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eca4ee8 and ed3989c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/AddActionMenu/WindowExplorer/Common/ControlActionsPage_New.xaml.cs (3 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/AddActionMenu/WindowExplorer/Common/ControlActionsPage_New.xaml.cs (3)

397-398: Remove unnecessary empty lines

These consecutive empty lines don't add to code readability and should be removed.


384-398: Consider splitting AddActionClicked method responsibilities

The method is handling both action setup and action handling. Consider extracting the description formatting logic to make the method more focused and maintainable.

+private void SetupDefaultAction()
+{
+    if (DefaultAction == null) return;
+    DefaultAction.Description = FormatActionDescription(DefaultAction);
+}

 public void AddActionClicked(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
 {
     // ... existing validation code ...
     
     if (!IsLegacyPlatform)
     {
-        if (DefaultAction is ActUIElement)
-        {
-            DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
-        }
-        // ... rest of the duplicate code ...
+        SetupDefaultAction();
     }
     
     ActionsFactory.AddActionsHandler(selectedAct, mContext);
 }

229-242: Add XML documentation for the action description format

Consider adding XML documentation to explain the format used for action descriptions. This will help maintain consistency when new action types are added.

+/// <summary>
+/// Format for UI Element actions: "{ElementAction} : {ElementType} - {ElementName}"
+/// Format for Browser Element actions: "{ControlAction} : {ElementType} - {ElementName}"
+/// </summary>
 private string FormatActionDescription(Act action)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 89bbc76 and eca4ee8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/AddActionMenu/WindowExplorer/Common/ControlActionsPage_New.xaml.cs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/AddActionMenu/WindowExplorer/Common/ControlActionsPage_New.xaml.cs (1)

Line range hint 1-624: Verify PR title and changes alignment

The PR title mentions "Playwright IFrame fixed", but the changes appear to be focused on action description formatting. Please clarify how these changes relate to fixing iframe handling in Playwright.

Comment on lines 229 to 242
if (DefaultAction is ActUIElement)
{
(DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementData = mElementInfo.GetElementData();
DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
}
else if(DefaultAction is ActBrowserElement)
else if (DefaultAction is ActBrowserElement)
{
DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActBrowserElement).ControlAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
}

else
{
DefaultAction.Description = string.Empty;
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Refactor description formatting logic to reduce duplication

The description formatting logic is duplicated later in the AddActionClicked method. Consider extracting this into a private method.

+private string FormatActionDescription(Act action)
+{
+    if (action == null) return string.Empty;
+    
+    if (action is ActUIElement uiElement)
+    {
+        return string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", uiElement.ElementAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
+    }
+    if (action is ActBrowserElement browserElement)
+    {
+        return string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", browserElement.ControlAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
+    }
+    return string.Empty;
+}

Then use it in both places:

-if (DefaultAction is ActUIElement)
-{
-    (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementData = mElementInfo.GetElementData();
-    DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
-}
-else if (DefaultAction is ActBrowserElement)
-{
-    DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActBrowserElement).ControlAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
-}
-else
-{
-    DefaultAction.Description = string.Empty;
-}
+if (DefaultAction is ActUIElement uiElement)
+{
+    uiElement.ElementData = mElementInfo.GetElementData();
+}
+DefaultAction.Description = FormatActionDescription(DefaultAction);

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.


⚠️ Potential issue

Add null checks for ElementTypeEnum and ElementName

The code assumes mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum and mElementInfo.ElementName are not null. Add defensive checks to prevent potential NullReferenceException.

 if (DefaultAction is ActUIElement)
 {
     (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementData = mElementInfo.GetElementData();
-    DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
+    DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", 
+        (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementAction, 
+        mElementInfo?.ElementTypeEnum?.ToString() ?? "Unknown", 
+        mElementInfo?.ElementName ?? "Unnamed");
 }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines 384 to 396
if (DefaultAction is ActUIElement)
{
DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
}
else if (DefaultAction is ActBrowserElement)
{
DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActBrowserElement).ControlAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
}
else
{
DefaultAction.Description = string.Empty;
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove duplicated description formatting logic

This code block duplicates the logic from SetPlatformBasedUIUpdates method. Use the suggested FormatActionDescription method here as well.

-if (DefaultAction is ActUIElement)
-{
-    DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActUIElement).ElementAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
-}
-else if (DefaultAction is ActBrowserElement)
-{
-    DefaultAction.Description = string.Format("{0} : {1} - {2}", (DefaultAction as ActBrowserElement).ControlAction, mElementInfo.ElementTypeEnum.ToString(), mElementInfo.ElementName);
-}
-else
-{
-    DefaultAction.Description = string.Empty;
-}
+DefaultAction.Description = FormatActionDescription(DefaultAction);

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@Maheshkale447 Maheshkale447 merged commit 44008b1 into Releases/Official-Release Dec 10, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@Maheshkale447 Maheshkale447 deleted the BugFix/PlayWrightFix branch December 10, 2024 12:09
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2024
15 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 11, 2025
15 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants