Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing lint dependency #636

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2018
Merged

Add missing lint dependency #636

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2018

Conversation

fhinkel
Copy link
Contributor

@fhinkel fhinkel commented Jun 5, 2018

npm test, which runs the linter, needs this dependency explicitly.

We install semistandard manually on CircleCi. But since it's required in a sample's run test, it should be in the package.json.

@fhinkel fhinkel requested a review from ace-n June 5, 2018 14:44
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #636 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #636   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   48.52%   48.52%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          68       68           
=======================================
  Hits           33       33           
  Misses         35       35

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7c98f38...35bd71e. Read the comment docs.

@JustinBeckwith
Copy link
Contributor

Can you also run semistandard fix? Guessing there are changes this would need :)

@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@
},
"dependencies": {
"express": "4.16.2",
"got": "8.2.0"
"got": "8.2.0",
"semistandard": "^12.0.1"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be a dev dependency? Here and below!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, yes, you're right. Fixed.

@fhinkel
Copy link
Contributor Author

fhinkel commented Jun 5, 2018

semistandard fix didn't create any changes and npm run lint is green.

@fhinkel fhinkel merged commit 81aecc3 into master Jun 5, 2018
@fhinkel fhinkel deleted the FixTests branch June 5, 2018 20:25
kweinmeister pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2022
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ace-n pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2022
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ace-n pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2022
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ahrarmonsur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2022
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [4.1.0](googleapis/nodejs-asset@v4.0.0...v4.1.0) (2022-06-29)


### Features

* support regapic LRO ([#635](googleapis/nodejs-asset#635)) ([140ce9d](googleapis/nodejs-asset@140ce9d))

---
This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
ahrarmonsur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2022
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [4.1.0](googleapis/nodejs-asset@v4.0.0...v4.1.0) (2022-06-29)


### Features

* support regapic LRO ([#635](googleapis/nodejs-asset#635)) ([140ce9d](googleapis/nodejs-asset@140ce9d))

---
This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
ahrarmonsur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2022
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [4.1.0](googleapis/nodejs-asset@v4.0.0...v4.1.0) (2022-06-29)


### Features

* support regapic LRO ([#635](googleapis/nodejs-asset#635)) ([140ce9d](googleapis/nodejs-asset@140ce9d))

---
This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
ahrarmonsur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2022
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [4.1.0](googleapis/nodejs-asset@v4.0.0...v4.1.0) (2022-06-29)


### Features

* support regapic LRO ([#635](googleapis/nodejs-asset#635)) ([140ce9d](googleapis/nodejs-asset@140ce9d))

---
This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
ahrarmonsur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2022
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [4.1.0](googleapis/nodejs-asset@v4.0.0...v4.1.0) (2022-06-29)


### Features

* support regapic LRO ([#635](googleapis/nodejs-asset#635)) ([140ce9d](googleapis/nodejs-asset@140ce9d))

---
This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
ace-n pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2022
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [4.1.0](googleapis/nodejs-asset@v4.0.0...v4.1.0) (2022-06-29)


### Features

* support regapic LRO ([#635](googleapis/nodejs-asset#635)) ([140ce9d](googleapis/nodejs-asset@140ce9d))

---
This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants