-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
porter 1.1.0 (new formula) #175982
porter 1.1.0 (new formula) #175982
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks, looks pretty close
90c186a
to
f3c0b99
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for your contribution! 🍻
Signed-off-by: Ruihua Wen <spiffyeight77@gmail.com> autobump: add porter Signed-off-by: Rui Chen <rui@chenrui.dev>
f3c0b99
to
c11b13f
Compare
@SpiffyEight77, thanks for your contribution to Homebrew! 🎉 🥇 Without awesome contributors like you, it would be impossible to maintain Homebrew to the high level of quality users have come to expect. Thank you!!!! |
HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew test <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict <formula>
(after doingHOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>
)? If this is a new formula, does it passbrew audit --new <formula>
?