🔨 Removes respx library from base requirements listing (fastapi.in)

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

• In PR ♻️ Maintenance: reduce code duplication #4982 I did a mistake by adding a testing library like respx in a base listing. This propagated into the cluster-keeper after ⬆️ Maintenance: upgrade of clusters-keeper #4997
• Adds a tests that detects some test libraries in base requirements listing
• EXTRA: adds patch by @sanderegg that might fix timeout error in cluster-keeper tests.

Related issue/s

• Fixes requirements modified in ♻️ Maintenance: reduce code duplication #4982
• Fixes problem caused in ⬆️ Maintenance: upgrade of clusters-keeper #4997

How to test

• adds a test that check for some common test libraries

DevOps

None

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5003 (9a55d54) into master (da3e254) will decrease coverage by 0.5%.
The diff coverage is 100.0%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #5003     +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage    87.2%   86.8%   -0.5%     
========================================
  Files        1244     998    -246     
  Lines       51145   43016   -8129     
  Branches     1081     554    -527     
========================================
- Hits        44632   37343   -7289     
+ Misses       6275    5545    -730     
+ Partials      238     128    -110     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	63.6% <ø> (-1.3%)	⬇️
unittests	84.2% <100.0%> (-0.8%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...lusters_keeper/modules/clusters_management_task.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)

... and 256 files with indirect coverage changes

[bisgaard-itis]

Thanks for the quick fix!

[sanderegg]

thanks!

[jsaq007]

👍🏼

[codeclimate]

Code Climate has analyzed commit 9a55d54 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.2% Duplication