Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates required for creating binary (build) caches #484

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 25, 2023

Conversation

climbfuji
Copy link
Collaborator

@climbfuji climbfuji commented Feb 24, 2023

Description

This PR updates the submodule pointer for spack with changes required for creating binary (build) caches for multiple packages, for example all packages in an environment, at once. See JCSDA/spack#231 for a description of the changes.

I also added a config option in configs/common/config.yaml that must be enabled when creating build caches. It is not enabled by default, because the option should only be used when creating build caches. It basically pads the library path in shared libraries with "garbage" so that a package can later be relocated to a path that is longer than the one it was built for. In future PRs, we will provide the necessary documentation and automation to enable this option when creating build caches.

This PR is also needed to fix the CI tests in following PRs (see #476 for macOS, Linux will be contributed by EPIC using Jenkins, plus possible other solutions).

Issues

Working towards #365

Dependencies

Waiting on JCSDA/spack#231

Copy link
Collaborator

@ulmononian ulmononian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

5star. approved.

@climbfuji climbfuji merged commit 66d72ac into JCSDA:develop Feb 25, 2023
@climbfuji climbfuji deleted the feature/buildcaches branch February 25, 2023 02:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
INFRA JEDI Infrastructure
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants