You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Similarly to this issue, glyphs should be provided for these longer variants of arrows as well, ⟵ ⟷ ⟶. I believe Fira Code accomplishes this by using the same glyph that it uses for the --> ligature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @derekschinke , i have fear that adding glyphs with double weight will brake things like in this issue #230. We will test it, if there will be no problems, i will add the glyphs.
Similarly to this issue, glyphs should be provided for these longer variants of arrows as well,
⟵ ⟷ ⟶
. I believe Fira Code accomplishes this by using the same glyph that it uses for the-->
ligature.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: