Test Julia v1.6 explicitly in CI #548
Conversation
Codecov ReportBase: 90.36% // Head: 90.36% // No change to project coverage 👍
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #548 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.36% 90.36%
=======================================
Files 25 25
Lines 1796 1796
=======================================
Hits 1623 1623
Misses 173 173 Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
| @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ jobs: | |||
| matrix: | |||
| version: | |||
| - '1' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This already uses the latest version with pattern 1.*.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ups.... I thought that 1 stood for the LTS, which is 1.6, isn't it? Should I add 1.6 instead of 1.8? Or simply close this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 stands for latest 1.x.y stable release. I don't have strong opinions on whether or not we should test on LTS. I guess it could be good
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Currently we require Julia 1.5; I think it makes sense to require 1.6 instead, and thus it is healthy to test it.... I'll change this PR. (Yet, I leave this adjustment to #388, which I am reviewing now.)
Thanks @schillic for spotting this!
No description provided.