Reflect moving of textwidth
back to Base
#644
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
textwidth
was put back into Base in JuliaLang/julia#25479 which we hadn't properly reflected here, just had it accidentally correct thanks to the definition indeprecated.jl
. I think this only actually makes a difference forv"0.7.0-DEV.2915" ≤ VERSION < v"0.7.0-DEV.3393"
, where before this PR,Compat.textwidth
is undefined (as isBase.textwidth
). However, having a definition for non-deprecated functionality indeprecated.jl
seems bad, and instead of just moving it, I've tried to make Compat a little bit more like Base here.