Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Segmentation Fault on Argument Error #31686

Closed
schlurp opened this issue Apr 11, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

Segmentation Fault on Argument Error #31686

schlurp opened this issue Apr 11, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior

Comments

@schlurp
Copy link
Contributor

schlurp commented Apr 11, 2019

               _
   _       _ _(_)_     |  Documentation: https://docs.julialang.org
  (_)     | (_) (_)    |
   _ _   _| |_  __ _   |  Type "?" for help, "]?" for Pkg help.
  | | | | | | |/ _` |  |
  | | |_| | | | (_| |  |  Version 1.3.0-DEV.0 (2019-04-10)
 _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_|  |  Commit 62d7ec55fd (0 days old master)
|__/                   |

julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 1.3.0-DEV.0
Commit 62d7ec55fd (2019-04-10 19:08 UTC)
Platform Info:
  OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
  CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7820HQ CPU @ 2.90GHz
  WORD_SIZE: 64
  LIBM: libopenlibm
  LLVM: libLLVM-6.0.1 (ORCJIT, skylake)

When supplying a non-integer to the -p option, julia segfaults after printing an error message. Reproduce with

$ ./julia -p blubb
ERROR: julia: -p,--procs=<n> must be an integer >= 1
Segmentation fault

Valgrind output is

$ valgrind julia -p blubb
sh: 0: getcwd() failed: No such file or directory
==12813== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==12813== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==12813== Using Valgrind-3.14.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==12813== Command: julia -p blubb
==12813== 
ERROR: julia: -p,--procs=<n> must be an integer >= 1
==12813== Invalid read of size 8
==12813==    at 0x489E87B: jl_mutex_unlock (locks.h:166)
==12813==    by 0x489E87B: jl_atexit_hook (init.c:294)
==12813==    by 0x48BBBF6: jl_exit (jl_uv.c:613)
==12813==    by 0x48EE3C5: jl_vexceptionf (rtutils.c:53)
==12813==    by 0x48EE4F7: jl_errorf (rtutils.c:75)
==12813==    by 0x48E0C9F: jl_parse_opts (jloptions.c:400)
==12813==    by 0x10A2FE: main (repl.c:210)
==12813==  Address 0xfffffffffffffff8 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==12813== 
==12813== 
==12813== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==12813==  Access not within mapped region at address 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF8
==12813==    at 0x489E87B: jl_mutex_unlock (locks.h:166)
==12813==    by 0x489E87B: jl_atexit_hook (init.c:294)
==12813==    by 0x48BBBF6: jl_exit (jl_uv.c:613)
==12813==    by 0x48EE3C5: jl_vexceptionf (rtutils.c:53)
==12813==    by 0x48EE4F7: jl_errorf (rtutils.c:75)
==12813==    by 0x48E0C9F: jl_parse_opts (jloptions.c:400)
==12813==    by 0x10A2FE: main (repl.c:210)
==12813==  If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==12813==  overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==12813==  possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==12813==  main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==12813==  The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==12813== 
==12813== HEAP SUMMARY:
==12813==     in use at exit: 504,610 bytes in 1,147 blocks
==12813==   total heap usage: 1,211 allocs, 64 frees, 660,310 bytes allocated
==12813== 
==12813== LEAK SUMMARY:
==12813==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==12813==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==12813==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==12813==    still reachable: 504,610 bytes in 1,147 blocks
==12813==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==12813== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==12813== 
==12813== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==12813== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Segmentation fault
@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson self-assigned this Apr 11, 2019
@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson added the bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior label Apr 11, 2019
@Keno Keno closed this as completed in 5ce94d8 Apr 11, 2019
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 15, 2019
@KristofferC KristofferC mentioned this issue Apr 15, 2019
58 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants