Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #31899, type intersection involving Int in upper bound #31960

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2019

Conversation

JeffBezanson
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson added types and dispatch Types, subtyping and method dispatch bugfix This change fixes an existing bug labels May 7, 2019
@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson added this to the 1.2 milestone May 7, 2019
@@ -1779,7 +1781,10 @@ static jl_value_t *finish_unionall(jl_value_t *res JL_MAYBE_UNROOTED, jl_varbind
jl_tvar_t *newvar = vb->var;
JL_GC_PUSH2(&res, &newvar);
// try to reduce var to a single value
if (obviously_egal(vb->lb, vb->ub)) {
if (jl_is_long(vb->ub) && jl_is_typevar(vb->lb)) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

jl_is_typevar(vb->lb)

IIUC, doesn't this also need checks that vb->ub <: jl_any_type && vb->lb >: Union{}?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that would be more precise, I just wanted to be conservative here and also not complicate the code too much.

src/subtype.c Outdated
@@ -961,6 +961,8 @@ static int subtype(jl_value_t *x, jl_value_t *y, jl_stenv_t *e, int param)
if (yy) record_var_occurrence(yy, e, param);
if (yr) {
if (xx) record_var_occurrence(xx, e, param);
if (xx->lb == jl_bottom_type)
return 1; // allow Bottom <: non-type
return subtype(xx->lb, yy->ub, e, 0);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would have thought subtype should already handle lhs == Union{}, instead of needing to add a fast-path here to catch some cases of it just for the egal case?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it should be ok to change that. I thought there might be some reason we don't have that general fast path, but I'm not sure what it would be.

@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson merged commit 4c28b36 into master May 8, 2019
@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson deleted the jb/fix31899 branch May 8, 2019 18:38
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2019
@KristofferC KristofferC mentioned this pull request May 13, 2019
58 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugfix This change fixes an existing bug types and dispatch Types, subtyping and method dispatch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants