Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LLVM_full@12] Add LLVM AArch64 unwind patches #3221

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 29, 2021
Merged

Conversation

vchuravy
Copy link
Member

Splitting out the LLVM 12 patches from #3063

@vchuravy vchuravy added julia 💜 ❤️ 💚 Builders and issues related to Julia and its dependencies LLVM 🐉 labels Jun 28, 2021
@vchuravy
Copy link
Member Author

@topolarity any idea about the MacOS build failure?

@giordano which libc++ are we building against? FUNC:_ZSt28__throw_bad_array_new_lengthv@@GLIBCXX_3.4.29

@giordano
Copy link
Member

@giordano which libc++ are we building against? FUNC:_ZSt28__throw_bad_array_new_lengthv@@GLIBCXX_3.4.29

You mean libstdc++? That should depend on the version of GCC used here. GLIBCXX_3.4.29 is GCC 11

@vchuravy vchuravy requested a review from giordano June 29, 2021 18:40
@@ -28,19 +28,19 @@ uuid = "2a0f44e3-6c83-55bd-87e4-b1978d98bd5f"

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be clear, I don't think this is a good long-term solution. I'll need to update BinaryBuilderBase for #3229 for example (we need JuliaPackaging/BinaryBuilderBase.jl#156). What if we move csl_paths(host_platform) at the beginning of LD_LIBRARY_PATH instead? @staticfloat?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
julia 💜 ❤️ 💚 Builders and issues related to Julia and its dependencies LLVM 🐉
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants