Wrappers for v7.4.0

[rayegun]

Now we play a game of chicken. Which do we merge first? This or JuliaLang/julia#52577

[rayegun]

Do not merge yet regardless, I need to test this locally and be sure there weren't technically breaking changes.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 97 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (feb54ee) 85.57% compared to head (80c7812) 84.43%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/solvers/wrappers.jl	5.82%	97 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #480      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.57%   84.43%   -1.14%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines        8832     8874      +42     
==========================================
- Hits         7558     7493      -65     
- Misses       1274     1381     +107     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[giordano]

I think this should go together with #478.

[giordano]

Ah, test failures on nightly are the same as JuliaLang/julia#52577 (comment)

[rayegun]

I really don't understand this permutation thing. I will try again to find the cause

[giordano]

Good news is that it seems to be reproducible on 32-bit Linux, which should be easier to debug than 32-bit Windows, as you can run the 32-bit build on a 64-bit Linux system.

[rayegun]

Where can I download the 32-bit build?

[giordano]

Since the failure in CI is reproducible with a plain nightly build, you can use https://julialangnightlies-s3.julialang.org/bin/linux/i686/julia-latest-linux-i686.tar.gz (from https://julialang.org/downloads/nightlies/)