Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate Trainer.should_rank_save_checkpoint property #11068

Merged

Conversation

jjenniferdai
Copy link
Contributor

@jjenniferdai jjenniferdai commented Dec 15, 2021

What does this PR do?

see context: #11035 (comment)
original PR: #9433
original issue: #9074

Go through deprecation for public property

Does your PR introduce any breaking changes? If yes, please list them.

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
  • Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or internal minor changes/refactorings)

PR review

Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Before you start reviewing make sure you have read Review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
  • Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
  • Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

@ananthsub ananthsub added this to the 1.6 milestone Dec 15, 2021
@ananthsub ananthsub added checkpointing Related to checkpointing deprecation Includes a deprecation labels Dec 15, 2021
CHANGELOG.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@carmocca carmocca closed this Dec 15, 2021
@jjenniferdai jjenniferdai reopened this Dec 15, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #11068 (13b41f7) into master (06c5903) will decrease coverage by 4%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #11068    +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage      92%      88%    -4%     
========================================
  Files         177      177            
  Lines       16492    16502    +10     
========================================
- Hits        15151    14551   -600     
- Misses       1341     1951   +610     

jjenniferdai and others added 2 commits December 15, 2021 10:55
Co-authored-by: Carlos Mocholí <carlossmocholi@gmail.com>
@mergify mergify bot added the ready PRs ready to be merged label Dec 15, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@awaelchli awaelchli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand how we can deprecate this on the trainer while at the same time remove it on the strategy. You will have to copy this implementation into the deprecated property method:

return isinstance(self.ttp, TPUSpawn) and self.local_rank == 0 or self.is_global_zero and it won't cover custom plugins.

So yeah, this will be confusing.

@carmocca carmocca merged commit 01e0dac into Lightning-AI:master Dec 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
checkpointing Related to checkpointing deprecation Includes a deprecation ready PRs ready to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants