Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: cherry-pick (#8742) #8765

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024
Merged

fix: cherry-pick (#8742) #8765

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

blackdevelopa
Copy link
Contributor

@blackdevelopa blackdevelopa commented Feb 28, 2024

Cherry-pick fix for #8742 on version 7.17.0.

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

Context:
https://consensys.slack.com/archives/C05HZHDS89Z/p1708946195217929
Pass origin as `metamask` for ppom validate request

Fixes:

1. Go to this page...
2.
3.

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it
is solved.
- [ ] I've linked related issues
- [ ] I've included manual testing steps
- [ ] I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.
- [ ] I’ve properly set the pull request status:
  - [ ] In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft".
- [ ] In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to
"non-draft".

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
@blackdevelopa blackdevelopa requested a review from a team as a code owner February 28, 2024 10:28
Copy link
Contributor

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

@blackdevelopa blackdevelopa added the team-confirmations-secure-ux-PR PR from the confirmations team label Feb 28, 2024
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (release/7.17.0@10aaa64). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             release/7.17.0    #8765   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage                  ?   41.10%           
=================================================
  Files                     ?     1248           
  Lines                     ?    30417           
  Branches                  ?     2969           
=================================================
  Hits                      ?    12504           
  Misses                    ?    17165           
  Partials                  ?      748           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@blackdevelopa blackdevelopa changed the title fix: cherry pick 2148 fix: cherry pick 8742 Feb 28, 2024
@blackdevelopa blackdevelopa changed the title fix: cherry pick 8742 fix: cherry pick (#8742) Feb 28, 2024
@blackdevelopa blackdevelopa changed the title fix: cherry pick (#8742) fix: cherry-pick (#8742) Feb 28, 2024
@blackdevelopa blackdevelopa added the Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise label Feb 28, 2024
@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the INVALID-PR-TEMPLATE PR's body doesn't match template label Feb 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

E2E test started on Bitrise: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/c7420a01-d581-4dbf-a6ca-6ad4d71f398f
You can also kick off another Bitrise E2E smoke test by removing and re-applying the (Run Smoke E2E) label

@sethkfman sethkfman added the regression-RC DEPRECATED: Please use "regresssion-RC-x.y.z" label instead label Feb 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sethkfman sethkfman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sethkfman sethkfman merged commit 9c11aac into release/7.17.0 Feb 29, 2024
36 checks passed
@sethkfman sethkfman deleted the cherrypick-2148 branch February 29, 2024 00:48
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 29, 2024
@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the release-7.17.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 7.17.0 label Feb 29, 2024
@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

No release label on PR. Adding release label release-7.17.0 on PR, as PR was cherry-picked in branch 7.17.0.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
INVALID-PR-TEMPLATE PR's body doesn't match template regression-RC DEPRECATED: Please use "regresssion-RC-x.y.z" label instead release-7.17.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 7.17.0 Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise team-confirmations-secure-ux-PR PR from the confirmations team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants