add Progress Overview #30
Conversation
WalkthroughThe Changes
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Catrya has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)
49-62: Consider adding brief descriptions for technical itemsWhile the pending items are well-structured, consider adding brief descriptions for technical items to help new contributors understand their scope. For example:
- "Nip-06 support (identity management)" is a good example of providing context
- Similar context could be added for "nip-17" in the direct message item
- "Cooperative cancellation" could benefit from a brief explanation
Example enhancement:
- [ ] Direct message with peers (use nip-17) + [ ] Direct message with peers (using nip-17 for secure relay communication) - [ ] Cooperative cancellation + [ ] Cooperative cancellation (mutual agreement to cancel an ongoing trade)
46-62: Consider adding priority levels or milestonesTo enhance project planning visibility, consider:
- Grouping items by milestone/release
- Adding priority levels (High/Medium/Low)
- Organizing items in priority order within each section
This would help contributors and users better understand the project's roadmap.
Example structure:
## Progress Overview ### Milestone 1 (Current) - [x] Displays order list - [ ] Take orders (Buy & Sell) [High Priority] - [ ] Posts Orders (Buy & Sell) [High Priority] ### Milestone 2 - [ ] Direct message with peers [Medium Priority] - [ ] Fiat sent [Medium Priority]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)
46-46: LGTM! Well-structured section header
The new section header follows proper markdown formatting and maintains consistency with the document structure.
47-48: LGTM! Clear indication of completed features
The completed items are well-documented using proper checklist syntax and provide clear visibility into project progress.
to see progress and pending tasks
Summary by CodeRabbit