-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
readme: take orders #34
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on updating the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
49-49
: Consider updating the progress section structureThe current progress section might benefit from grouping related features to better reflect implementation dependencies. Consider organizing features into categories like:
- Order Management
- Payment Flow
- Communication
- Dispute Resolution
Example restructuring:
## Progress Overview +### Order Management - [x] Displays order list - [x] Take orders (Buy & Sell) - [ ] Posts Orders (Buy & Sell) - [ ] List own orders - [ ] Maker cancel pending order +### Payment Flow - [ ] Fiat sent - [ ] Release - [ ] Buyer: add new invoice if payment fails +### Communication - [ ] Direct message with peers (use nip-17) - [ ] Conversation key management +### Dispute Handling - [ ] Dispute flow (users) - [ ] Dispute management (for admins) +### Additional Features - [ ] Rate users - [ ] Create buy orders with LN address - [ ] Nip-06 support (identity management)
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ $ cargo run | |||
## Progress Overview | |||
- [x] Displays order list | |||
- [x] Settings tab | |||
- [ ] Take orders (Buy & Sell) | |||
- [x] Take orders (Buy & Sell) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the code analysis so far, I can generate the final response:
Marking "Take orders" as complete appears premature
While basic order-taking functionality exists (take_order
method), the implementation appears incomplete:
- No proper handling of Nostr event kind 4 (encrypted DMs) was found
- Order status handling is minimal, only checking for "Pending" status
- The implementation relies on features marked as pending in README (e.g., direct messaging)
- Critical order flow components like hold invoice handling were not found in the codebase
Please consider:
- Keeping this item unchecked until the complete order flow is implemented
- Adding the dependent features (DMs, hold invoices, status updates) first
- Implementing proper error handling and status transitions
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the completeness of the "Take orders" implementation
While marking the "Take orders" feature as complete, several dependent features are still pending implementation:
- Direct messaging with peers (NIP-17)
- Fiat sent confirmation
- Release functionality
- Dispute handling
Please verify that the current implementation:
- Properly handles the complete order flow
- Functions correctly without these pending features
- Has adequate fallback mechanisms until these features are implemented
Let's verify the implementation completeness:
Let's gather more specific information about the implementation.
Let's gather more specific information about the buy/sell implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the presence of essential order-taking functionality
# Look for Nostr event kind 4 handling
echo "Checking for Nostr event kind 4 handling..."
rg -l "kind:\s*4" --type rust
# Look for hold invoice implementation
echo "Checking for hold invoice handling..."
rg -l "hold.?invoice" --type rust
# Look for order status management
echo "Checking for order status updates..."
rg -l "waiting-payment|waiting-buyer-invoice" --type rust
# Look for range order handling
echo "Checking for range order implementation..."
rg -l "range.?order" --type rust
Length of output: 534
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for order-related functionality in main.rs
echo "=== Order implementation in main.rs ==="
rg -A 10 "range.?order" src/main.rs
# Look for order-related types and structures
echo -e "\n=== Order-related types and enums ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'enum $_ {
$$$
}'
# Search for order status handling
echo -e "\n=== Order status handling ==="
rg -A 5 "status|state" --type rust
# Check for buy/sell command implementations
echo -e "\n=== Buy/Sell command implementations ==="
rg -A 10 "(buy|sell).*command" --type rust
Length of output: 10967
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for order kind definitions and handling
echo "=== Order Kind Implementation ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'enum OrderKind {
$$$
}'
# Look for order taking functionality
echo -e "\n=== Order Taking Implementation ==="
rg -A 15 "take.*order|handle.*order" --type rust
# Check for Nostr event handling related to orders
echo -e "\n=== Nostr Event Handling ==="
rg -A 10 "Kind::(4|9735)" --type rust
# Look for order status enum definition
echo -e "\n=== Order Status Definition ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'enum Status {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 4370
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with the rabbit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@grunch, glad we agree. If there's anything I can assist with in implementing the remaining aspects of the "Take orders (Buy & Sell)" feature—such as handling encrypted DMs (Nostr event kind 4), hold invoice processing, or order status updates—please feel free to reach out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't tested by with this you confirm that someone can take a buy order, mostro send you a lightining invoice and mostrui shows the QR code to pay it, and mostrui can handle the invoice payment by the seller, is this the behavior we have right now on take buy ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@grunch, based on the current codebase analysis, it appears that the functionality you described—where someone can take a buy order, Mostro sends a Lightning invoice, mostrui displays the QR code for payment, and mostrui handles the invoice payment by the seller—is not fully implemented yet.
Specifically:
- Lightning Invoice Handling: There's no implementation found for receiving or processing Lightning invoices from Mostro.
- QR Code Display: The codebase does not contain functionality to display QR codes for payment.
- Invoice Payment Handling: There isn't code to handle the seller's payment of the invoice within mostrui.
Given that these critical components are missing, it might be premature to mark the "Take orders (Buy & Sell)" feature as complete in the README. It may be advisable to keep this item unchecked until the full functionality is implemented and tested.
If you'd like, I can assist with outlining the steps needed to implement these features.
🔗 Analysis chain
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for implementation of "Take Buy Order" functionality
echo "=== Checking for 'Take Buy Order' functionality ==="
rg -A 5 "fn.*take_buy_order" --type rust
echo -e "\n=== Checking for Lightning invoice handling ==="
rg -A 10 "(lightning_invoice|create_invoice|hold_invoice|payment_request)" --type rust
echo -e "\n=== Checking for QR code display functionality ==="
rg -A 5 "(qr_code|QRCode|render_qr)" --type rust
echo -e "\n=== Checking for invoice payment handling by the seller ==="
rg -A 10 "(handle_invoice_payment|process_payment|payment_successful)" --type rust
Length of output: 749
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't tested by with this you confirm that someone can take a buy order, mostro send you a lightining invoice and mostrui shows the QR code to pay it, and mostrui can handle the invoice payment by the seller, is this the behavior we have right now on take buy ?
oh, you're right, it just send take-buy action to mostro. But mostrui doesn't show the QR code to pay for it nor can it handle the payment of the invoice by the seller.
I will close this pr until the whole process is completed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
close #10
Summary by CodeRabbit