Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

readme: take orders #34

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

readme: take orders #34

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Catrya
Copy link
Contributor

@Catrya Catrya commented Dec 9, 2024

close #10

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the progress overview in the README to reflect the completion status of the "Take orders (Buy & Sell)" feature.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on updating the README.md file, specifically the progress overview section. The status of the "Take orders (Buy & Sell)" feature has been updated from unchecked to checked, indicating its completion. The overall structure and content of the document remain unchanged, with no modifications made to the requirements or installation instructions.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Updated "Take orders (Buy & Sell)" status from unchecked to checked in the progress overview section.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
To take an order the seller will send a Nostr event kind 4 (Issue #10) The PR does not implement any code changes related to taking buy orders.

Possibly related issues

  • Take sell order #8: The changes in this PR may relate to the "Take sell order" issue, as both involve the order-taking process, although this PR does not address the implementation.

Possibly related PRs

  • add Progress Overview #30: This PR also involves updates to the README.md file regarding the "Take orders (Buy & Sell)" feature, aligning with the updates made in this PR.

Poem

🐇 Hop along with joy and cheer,
The orders taken, loud and clear!
From unchecked to checked, we see,
Progress made, as it should be!
With every leap, our goals align,
In the world of trade, we brightly shine! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

49-49: Consider updating the progress section structure

The current progress section might benefit from grouping related features to better reflect implementation dependencies. Consider organizing features into categories like:

  • Order Management
  • Payment Flow
  • Communication
  • Dispute Resolution

Example restructuring:

 ## Progress Overview
+### Order Management
 - [x] Displays order list
 - [x] Take orders (Buy & Sell)
 - [ ] Posts Orders (Buy & Sell)
 - [ ] List own orders
 - [ ] Maker cancel pending order
+### Payment Flow
 - [ ] Fiat sent
 - [ ] Release
 - [ ] Buyer: add new invoice if payment fails
+### Communication
 - [ ] Direct message with peers (use nip-17)
 - [ ] Conversation key management
+### Dispute Handling
 - [ ] Dispute flow (users)
 - [ ] Dispute management (for admins)
+### Additional Features
 - [ ] Rate users
 - [ ] Create buy orders with LN address
 - [ ] Nip-06 support (identity management)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d6fff4 and bd322e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ $ cargo run
## Progress Overview
- [x] Displays order list
- [x] Settings tab
- [ ] Take orders (Buy & Sell)
- [x] Take orders (Buy & Sell)
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Dec 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Based on the code analysis so far, I can generate the final response:

Marking "Take orders" as complete appears premature

While basic order-taking functionality exists (take_order method), the implementation appears incomplete:

  • No proper handling of Nostr event kind 4 (encrypted DMs) was found
  • Order status handling is minimal, only checking for "Pending" status
  • The implementation relies on features marked as pending in README (e.g., direct messaging)
  • Critical order flow components like hold invoice handling were not found in the codebase

Please consider:

  • Keeping this item unchecked until the complete order flow is implemented
  • Adding the dependent features (DMs, hold invoices, status updates) first
  • Implementing proper error handling and status transitions
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the completeness of the "Take orders" implementation

While marking the "Take orders" feature as complete, several dependent features are still pending implementation:

  • Direct messaging with peers (NIP-17)
  • Fiat sent confirmation
  • Release functionality
  • Dispute handling

Please verify that the current implementation:

  1. Properly handles the complete order flow
  2. Functions correctly without these pending features
  3. Has adequate fallback mechanisms until these features are implemented

Let's verify the implementation completeness:


Let's gather more specific information about the implementation.


Let's gather more specific information about the buy/sell implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the presence of essential order-taking functionality

# Look for Nostr event kind 4 handling
echo "Checking for Nostr event kind 4 handling..."
rg -l "kind:\s*4" --type rust

# Look for hold invoice implementation
echo "Checking for hold invoice handling..."
rg -l "hold.?invoice" --type rust

# Look for order status management
echo "Checking for order status updates..."
rg -l "waiting-payment|waiting-buyer-invoice" --type rust

# Look for range order handling
echo "Checking for range order implementation..."
rg -l "range.?order" --type rust

Length of output: 534


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for order-related functionality in main.rs
echo "=== Order implementation in main.rs ==="
rg -A 10 "range.?order" src/main.rs

# Look for order-related types and structures
echo -e "\n=== Order-related types and enums ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'enum $_ {
  $$$
}'

# Search for order status handling
echo -e "\n=== Order status handling ==="
rg -A 5 "status|state" --type rust

# Check for buy/sell command implementations
echo -e "\n=== Buy/Sell command implementations ==="
rg -A 10 "(buy|sell).*command" --type rust

Length of output: 10967


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for order kind definitions and handling
echo "=== Order Kind Implementation ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'enum OrderKind {
  $$$
}'

# Look for order taking functionality
echo -e "\n=== Order Taking Implementation ==="
rg -A 15 "take.*order|handle.*order" --type rust

# Check for Nostr event handling related to orders
echo -e "\n=== Nostr Event Handling ==="
rg -A 10 "Kind::(4|9735)" --type rust

# Look for order status enum definition
echo -e "\n=== Order Status Definition ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'enum Status {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 4370

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with the rabbit

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@grunch, glad we agree. If there's anything I can assist with in implementing the remaining aspects of the "Take orders (Buy & Sell)" feature—such as handling encrypted DMs (Nostr event kind 4), hold invoice processing, or order status updates—please feel free to reach out.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't tested by with this you confirm that someone can take a buy order, mostro send you a lightining invoice and mostrui shows the QR code to pay it, and mostrui can handle the invoice payment by the seller, is this the behavior we have right now on take buy ?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@grunch, based on the current codebase analysis, it appears that the functionality you described—where someone can take a buy order, Mostro sends a Lightning invoice, mostrui displays the QR code for payment, and mostrui handles the invoice payment by the seller—is not fully implemented yet.

Specifically:

  • Lightning Invoice Handling: There's no implementation found for receiving or processing Lightning invoices from Mostro.
  • QR Code Display: The codebase does not contain functionality to display QR codes for payment.
  • Invoice Payment Handling: There isn't code to handle the seller's payment of the invoice within mostrui.

Given that these critical components are missing, it might be premature to mark the "Take orders (Buy & Sell)" feature as complete in the README. It may be advisable to keep this item unchecked until the full functionality is implemented and tested.

If you'd like, I can assist with outlining the steps needed to implement these features.

🔗 Analysis chain
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for implementation of "Take Buy Order" functionality

echo "=== Checking for 'Take Buy Order' functionality ==="
rg -A 5 "fn.*take_buy_order" --type rust

echo -e "\n=== Checking for Lightning invoice handling ==="
rg -A 10 "(lightning_invoice|create_invoice|hold_invoice|payment_request)" --type rust

echo -e "\n=== Checking for QR code display functionality ==="
rg -A 5 "(qr_code|QRCode|render_qr)" --type rust

echo -e "\n=== Checking for invoice payment handling by the seller ==="
rg -A 10 "(handle_invoice_payment|process_payment|payment_successful)" --type rust

Length of output: 749

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't tested by with this you confirm that someone can take a buy order, mostro send you a lightining invoice and mostrui shows the QR code to pay it, and mostrui can handle the invoice payment by the seller, is this the behavior we have right now on take buy ?

oh, you're right, it just send take-buy action to mostro. But mostrui doesn't show the QR code to pay for it nor can it handle the payment of the invoice by the seller.
I will close this pr until the whole process is completed.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!

@Catrya Catrya closed this Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Take buy order
2 participants