You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using KS3 with data from a 24Ch linear probe (Uprobe) - I am ending with >120 clusters (some cases >200) with around ~50% of them classified as 'good' - this seems rather high for the number of channels and can require a fair bit of manual merging afterwards.
I have tried the suggestions from issue #67 - changing "ops.Nfilt" and AUCsplit. I have played around by using a wide range of values from 0.5 to 0.99 for the AUCsplit but this has very little effect on cluster numbers.
I am not sure if this is related, but in order to get KS3 to work I had to set the "ops.nblocks" in the config file to zero.
Any advice/suggestions would be most welcome.
Many thanks
D
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't believe the AUCsplit does anything in KS3. Making nblock=0 means no drift correction is taking place.
One possibility is to manually change the thresholds for merging in find_merges. Merging clusters with similar templates here could save you time later.
Hello
I am using KS3 with data from a 24Ch linear probe (Uprobe) - I am ending with >120 clusters (some cases >200) with around ~50% of them classified as 'good' - this seems rather high for the number of channels and can require a fair bit of manual merging afterwards.
I have tried the suggestions from issue #67 - changing "ops.Nfilt" and AUCsplit. I have played around by using a wide range of values from 0.5 to 0.99 for the AUCsplit but this has very little effect on cluster numbers.
I am not sure if this is related, but in order to get KS3 to work I had to set the "ops.nblocks" in the config file to zero.
Any advice/suggestions would be most welcome.
Many thanks
D
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: