-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chsp physics update, global latlon grid, post changes and CCN-IN followup bugfix #104
Chsp physics update, global latlon grid, post changes and CCN-IN followup bugfix #104
Conversation
> > Co-authored-by: Jongil Han <jingil.han@noaa.gov>
…frey Whitaker Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Whitaker <Jeffrey.S.Whitaker@noaa.gov>
Co-authored-by: Jongil Han <jongil.han@noaa.gov>
Co-authored-by: Dom Heinzeller <dom.heinzeller@noaa.gov>
Co-authored-by: Grant Firl <grantf@ucar.edu>
…physics/physics/sfc_diff.f; updates for CCPP
CHSP latlon post: bugfixes and missing updates for CCPP
@@ -4275,7 +4309,7 @@ subroutine GFS_physics_driver & | |||
Statein%pgr, Statein%phil, clw, Stateout%gq0, & | |||
Stateout%gt0, Stateout%gu0, Stateout%gv0, rain1, & | |||
kbot, ktop, kcnv, islmsk, Statein%vvl, ncld, & | |||
Diag%hpbl, hflx, evap, ud_mf, dt_mf, cnvw, cnvc, & | |||
Diag%hpbl, hflxq, evapq, ud_mf, dt_mf, cnvw, cnvc,& |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am sure you have a reason for it, but I don't understand why this change is only for shalcnv, but not for samfshalcnv (or any other convection scheme)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is because only shalcnv among convection schemes needs kinematic sensible heat flux (hflx) and latent heat flux (evap) for the cloud base mass flux. The other convection schemes do not use hflx & evap.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, got it! We need to make sure - I'll create an issue to check - that none of the additional convection schemes in CCPP that are not in IPD use hflx & evap.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Co-authored-by: Denise Worthen <Denise.Worthen@noaa.gov>
gfsphysics/physics/ugwp_driver_v0.f
Outdated
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ module sso_coorde | |||
use machine, only: kind_phys | |||
real(kind=kind_phys),parameter :: pgwd = 1._kind_phys | |||
real(kind=kind_phys),parameter :: pgwd4 = 1._kind_phys | |||
logical debugprint = .false. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See comment here: NCAR/ccpp-physics#440 (comment)
Final RT passed, code is ready for commit after review. Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes for the canopy heat storage parameterization (CHSP), thermal roughness length, and increased background diffusivity and mixing length in the inversion layers look fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did raise one question that remains unanswered (https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/fv3atm/pull/104/files?file-filters%5B%5D=.F90&file-filters%5B%5D=.f&file-filters%5B%5D=.f90&file-filters%5B%5D=.meta&file-filters%5B%5D=dotfile#r414570311), but this shouldn't delay the commit. Otherwise this is a bunch of important changes!
Jongil's answer: It is because only shalcnv among convection schemes need
kinematic sensible heat flux (hflx) and latent heat flux (evap) for the
cloud base mass flux. The other convection schemes do not use hflx & evap.
…On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 9:52 AM Dom Heinzeller ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** approved this pull request.
I did raise one question that remains unanswered (
https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/fv3atm/pull/104/files?file-filters%5B%5D=.F90&file-filters%5B%5D=.f&file-filters%5B%5D=.f90&file-filters%5B%5D=.meta&file-filters%5B%5D=dotfile#r414570311),
but this shouldn't delay the commit. Otherwise this is a bunch of important
changes!
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#104 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI7D6TKTNYSURXHGTX27W2TRO3NSHANCNFSM4MNLI66Q>
.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great. All my changes are present as expected.
…ertAerosols Gf radiation update revert aerosols
GF_Tune_Oct2021
In the commit:
Related PRs:
ccpp/physics #440
#104
NEMS #55
ufs-weather-model #108