Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Auto-assign reviewers by file #7229

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2022
Merged

Auto-assign reviewers by file #7229

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2022

Conversation

Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented Oct 27, 2022

This was discussed in the documentation meeting to get quicker reviewers on manual related things.

@Mic92 Mic92 changed the title assign fricklerhandwerk for documentation releated PRs assign fricklerhandwerk to documentation releated PRs Oct 27, 2022
@Mic92 Mic92 marked this pull request as draft October 27, 2022 16:17
@fricklerhandwerk fricklerhandwerk changed the title assign fricklerhandwerk to documentation releated PRs Auto-assign reviewers by file Oct 28, 2022
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2022-10-28-documentation-team-meeting-13/22806/1

@thufschmitt thufschmitt added the process Issues related to the development process of Nix label Nov 2, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@fricklerhandwerk fricklerhandwerk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • @thufschmitt: we need this because CODEOWNERS requires commit access
    • @edolstra: also it makes an implication of ownership
    • @fricklerhandwerk: why is that a problem?
      • @edolstra: don't want a too large group of people to have veto power over the code
    • @thufschmitt: we can note this in the file, that it does not mean actual onership?
    • @fricklerhandwerk: we need both code ownership (and being on the Nix team should come with the right and duty to own code) and a means to notify people who care about changes but don't have merge access
  • @thufschmitt: it's quite an expensive routine, but this is GitHub's cost
    • also it's silly that maintainers have to press the button on PRs by outside contributors, but we should be able to handle it
    • @edolstra: can we have the same thing as in Nixpkgs?
      • @fricklerhandwerk: there a bot reads the maintainers attribute on packages, we can't do that here
      • @thufschmitt: a bot could read git blame and assign automatically based on that
        • @fricklerhandwerk: that would not help notifying people interested in tracking changes and reviewing code before they got anything merged
  • @edolstra: this is a good change, let's merge this

Decision

undraft and merge

@fricklerhandwerk fricklerhandwerk marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2022 13:16
@thufschmitt
Copy link
Member

thufschmitt commented Nov 4, 2022

This is great, let's merge it.

@Mic92 is there anything you'd like to do on this PR before we merge it? Otherwise feel free to un-draft it and I'll merge

@thufschmitt
Copy link
Member

Personal comment: Could you document it somewhere?

I'm not sure what would be the best place for that (cc @fricklerhandwerk). That probably deserves a custom section under https://github.com/NixOS/nix/tree/master/doc/manual/src/contributing/

@Mic92
Copy link
Member Author

Mic92 commented Nov 4, 2022

@Mic92 is there anything you'd like to do on this PR before we merge it? Otherwise feel free to un-draft it and I'll merge

Ok from my side.

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2022-11-04-nix-team-meeting-minutes-6/22998/1

@edolstra
Copy link
Member

This doesn't work yet, I guess we need to configure some token or whatever (https://github.com/NixOS/nix/actions/runs/3445124965/jobs/5748478961).

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2022-11-11-nix-team-meeting-notes-7/23451/1

@Mic92 Mic92 deleted the ci branch December 4, 2022 10:31
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2023-06-08-documentation-team-meeting-notes-53/28938/1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
process Issues related to the development process of Nix
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants