pythonPackages.incapsula-cracker-py3: init at 0.1.8.1

[seghers]

Motivation for this change

I'd like to use this library in Python scripts.

@freezeboy Thank you.
https://discourse.nixos.org/t/buildpythonpackage-no-matching-distribution-found-for-requests-from-incapsula-cracker-py3-0-1-8-1/10152/6

Things done

• Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
• Built on platform(s)
  • NixOS
  • macOS
  • other Linux distributions
• Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
• Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
• Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
• Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

And in configuration.nix add

environment = {
  systemPackages = with pkgs; [
    (let
       in python3.withPackages (ps: [
          ps.argcomplete
          ps.beautifulsoup4
          ps.dateutil
          ps.incapsula-cracker-py3
        ])
    )
  ];
}; #environment

sudo nixos-rebuild test -I nixpkgs=/home/forked_repositories/nixpkgs --fast

Successful

sudo nixos-rebuild switch -I nixpkgs=/home/forked_repositories/nixpkgs

Successful

My python script using this package runs without errors.

[fabaff]

Related to #81418

[fabaff]

The upstream repo contains tests. Consider to switch to the source provided by GitHub to run the tests.

Add pythonImportsCheck = [ "incapsula" ]; as additional safe-guard.

[fabaff]

Consider to add yourself as maintainer.

[SuperSandro2000]

It is required for new packages actually.

[fabaff]

Indeed -> https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#reviewing-contributions-new-packages

[r-rmcgibbo]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 117412 at f718565 run on aarch64-linux 1

2 packages built successfully:

• python38Packages.incapsula-cracker-py3
• python39Packages.incapsula-cracker-py3

2 suggestions:

• warning: maintainers-missing

  Package does not have a maintainer. Consider adding yourself?

  Near pkgs/development/python-modules/incapsula-cracker-py3/default.nix:21:3:

     |
  21 |   meta = with lib; {
     |   ^
  

• warning: python-include-tests

  Consider adding a checkPhase for tests, or if not feasible, pythonImportsCheck.

  Near pkgs/development/python-modules/incapsula-cracker-py3/default.nix:22:0:

     |
  22 |     description = "Bypass sites guarded with Incapsula";
     | ^
  

---

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 117412 at f718565 run on x86_64-linux 1

2 packages built successfully:

• python38Packages.incapsula-cracker-py3
• python39Packages.incapsula-cracker-py3

2 suggestions:

• warning: maintainers-missing

  Package does not have a maintainer. Consider adding yourself?

  Near pkgs/development/python-modules/incapsula-cracker-py3/default.nix:21:3:

     |
  21 |   meta = with lib; {
     |   ^
  

• warning: python-include-tests

  Consider adding a checkPhase for tests, or if not feasible, pythonImportsCheck.

  Near pkgs/development/python-modules/incapsula-cracker-py3/default.nix:22:0:

     |
  22 |     description = "Bypass sites guarded with Incapsula";
     | ^
  

[fabaff]

This was fixed upstream (ziplokk1/incapsula-cracker-py3#25) in the meantime. But no new release was made.

[freezeboy]

So until it is released, we need this local patch

[fabaff]

Yes

[stale]

I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info