[BACKPORTS v1.14] 6X rev6 and rev8 as well as PAB ID and FMUM split

[julianoes]

This backports contains:

• Change FMU-v6x REV 6 IMU Order #22716
• Split PAB ID and FMUM #22639 (without d3c548b and 7ed20ec)
• px4_fmu-v6x:Rev 6 Sensors omit starting icm42688p, icm42670p, icm2069, icm20602 #22238
• px4_fmu-v6x:Add Sensor set 8 #22708

FYI @vincentpoont2

It's a bit of a scary/more involved backport due to #22639.

[davids5]

@julianoes It looks familiar:)
What did the conflicts look like?
Can we get a run on the test rack and full CI?

[julianoes]

Can we get a run on the test rack and full CI?

Sure, how? :)
I will try to test the ones I have here.

From what I remember, conflicts were around the RT board not being available yet, as well as the Auterion specific power module starter and the ina_launcher.

[julianoes]

@vincentpoont2 I've tested it on my Rev6. Do you want to do any other tests?

[vincentpoont2]

@julianoes It looks familiar:) What did the conflicts look like? Can we get a run on the test rack and full CI?

@davids5 How do we get the FMU-6XRT to be on the test rack? Is this Daniel's test rack?
@dagar Do you have one of these unit? Can we send you one of these unit? Same address?

[davids5]

FYI @PetervdPerk-NXP

[vincentpoont2]

Tested with the following VER and REV. All sensor startup without issue.

[julianoes]

Tested on CUAV and gyro/accel are correct.

(Mag and baros are not available but that's a problem orthogonal to this PR, see https://discord.com/channels/1022170275984457759/1040115319508832328/1219093339954221126.)
Nevermind, separate issue: #22901