Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change CI pytests to be more accurate #887

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024
Merged

Change CI pytests to be more accurate #887

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

mattcieslak
Copy link
Collaborator

Similar to PennLINC/qsirecon#177, change how pytests runs the workflows.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 43.88%. Comparing base (1e2cfa6) to head (f758f1d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #887       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   28.63%   43.88%   +15.25%     
===========================================
  Files          67       67               
  Lines       10076    10076               
  Branches     1136     1136               
===========================================
+ Hits         2885     4422     +1537     
+ Misses       7093     5431     -1662     
- Partials       98      223      +125     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link
Member

@tsalo tsalo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome bump in coverage!

@tsalo tsalo merged commit 903c99f into master Nov 22, 2024
21 checks passed
@tsalo tsalo deleted the ci/more-coverage branch November 22, 2024 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants