feat: improve perf route biblistes #585
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Load only necessary fields - Remove useless parameter id=None - Fix expression "nb_taxons" in BibListes model Reviewed-by: andriacap
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #585 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 52.34% 52.38% +0.04%
===========================================
Files 37 37
Lines 2432 2430 -2
===========================================
Hits 1273 1273
+ Misses 1159 1157 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Est ce qu'au passage il faudrait envisager de pouvoir filtrer sur id_liste et ne récupérer les infos que d'une seule liste ? |
7 tasks
Merged
|
Reprise dans #589 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See issue : #584
Reviewed-by: andriacap