feat: create deploySingleRequestProxy functionality in the sdk
#1474
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…o 1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new module for managing Single Request Proxy contracts within the payment-processor package. Key additions include the implementation of multiple asynchronous functions for deploying and processing payments through Single Request Proxy contracts, alongside comprehensive unit tests for these functionalities. The export capabilities of the payment-processor module are enhanced to include the new proxy functionalities. Additionally, updates to the RequestNetwork class improve payment request handling by incorporating fee information. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (1)packages/payment-processor/src/payment/single-request-proxy.ts (3)🔇 Additional comments (5)packages/payment-processor/src/payment/single-request-proxy.ts (5)
The function correctly handles the deployment of Single Request Proxy contracts, including validation of payment networks, error handling, and transaction management.
The validation logic ensures that the proxy contract has the required methods, enhancing the reliability of the system.
The function handles ERC20 token transfers and triggers the proxy's receive function appropriately.
The function handles ETH transfers to the proxy contract, ensuring proper execution of Ethereum payments.
The function determines the proxy type and calls the correct payment function, enhancing usability and maintaining code modularity. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
aimensahnoun
force-pushed
the
1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
branch
from
45cca9f to
eec0486
Compare
aimensahnoun
force-pushed
the
1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
branch
from
84fb664 to
df6af29
Compare
aimensahnoun
force-pushed
the
1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
branch
from
40d7bba to
8df842f
Compare
aimensahnoun
force-pushed
the
1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
branch
from
16dc636 to
1fd4723
Compare
aimensahnoun
force-pushed
the
1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
branch
from
cd1d473 to
7a0cebf
Compare
aimensahnoun
force-pushed
the
1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
branch
from
53cda1a to
635cc6f
Compare
aimensahnoun
force-pushed
the
1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
branch
from
eba8d37 to
57665b0
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts (5)
Learnt from: MantisClone PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1453 File: packages/smart-contracts/test/contracts/ERC20SingleRequestProxy.test.ts:150-152 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T18:30:55.410Z Learning: In `packages/smart-contracts/test/contracts/ERC20SingleRequestProxy.test.ts`, the skipped test `'should process a partial payment correctly'` exists intentionally to show that partial payments are supported without duplicating previous happy-path tests.Learnt from: MantisClone PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474 File: packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts:251-270 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T16:03:33.215Z Learning: When testing the payment-processor module, specifically in `packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts`, it's acceptable to omit tests for partial payments if they have already been covered at the smart-contract level.Learnt from: MantisClone PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474 File: packages/payment-processor/src/payment/single-request-proxy.ts:156-160 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T15:52:05.032Z Learning: When determining if a `SingleRequestProxy` is an `ERC20SingleRequestProxy` or an `EthereumSingleRequestProxy`, include a comment explaining that the presence of `tokenAddress` distinguishes between the two.Learnt from: MantisClone PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474 File: packages/smart-contracts/scripts/test-deploy-single-request-proxy.ts:14-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T20:00:25.780Z Learning: In test files, such as `packages/smart-contracts/scripts/test-deploy-single-request-proxy.ts`, extensive error handling and input validation are considered unnecessary.Learnt from: MantisClone PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474 File: packages/smart-contracts/scripts/test-deploy-single-request-proxy.ts:9-13 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T20:00:39.160Z Learning: In test files within `packages/smart-contracts/scripts`, high levels of type safety are not necessary; using `any` types is acceptable.
aimensahnoun
force-pushed
the
1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
branch
from
8ac398d to
a08c550
Compare
aimensahnoun
force-pushed
the
1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
branch
from
a08c550 to
9cef13e
Compare
MantisClone
reviewed
Oct 29, 2024
…sdk' of github.com:RequestNetwork/requestNetwork into 1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/payment-processor/src/payment/single-request-proxy.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
packages/payment-processor/src/payment/single-request-proxy.ts (2)
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474
File: packages/payment-processor/src/payment/single-request-proxy.ts:156-160
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T15:52:05.032Z
Learning: When determining if a `SingleRequestProxy` is an `ERC20SingleRequestProxy` or an `EthereumSingleRequestProxy`, include a comment explaining that the presence of `tokenAddress` distinguishes between the two.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474
File: packages/payment-processor/src/payment/single-request-proxy.ts:156-160
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T15:52:05.032Z
Learning: In the `payRequestWithSingleRequestProxy` function of `single-request-proxy.ts`, failing to retrieve `tokenAddress()` is expected for `EthereumSingleRequestProxy` contracts and is not an error.
packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts (7)
Learnt from: aimensahnoun
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474
File: packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts:138-139
Timestamp: 2024-10-29T08:02:02.600Z
Learning: When testing invalid requests in `packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts`, it's acceptable to use `@ts-expect-error` to suppress TypeScript errors when the request intentionally lacks required properties.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474
File: packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts:251-270
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T16:03:33.215Z
Learning: When testing the payment-processor module, specifically in `packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts`, it's acceptable to omit tests for partial payments if they have already been covered at the smart-contract level.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1453
File: packages/smart-contracts/test/contracts/ERC20SingleRequestProxy.test.ts:150-152
Timestamp: 2024-10-17T18:30:55.410Z
Learning: In `packages/smart-contracts/test/contracts/ERC20SingleRequestProxy.test.ts`, the skipped test `'should process a partial payment correctly'` exists intentionally to show that partial payments are supported without duplicating previous happy-path tests.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474
File: packages/payment-processor/src/payment/single-request-proxy.ts:156-160
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T15:52:05.032Z
Learning: When determining if a `SingleRequestProxy` is an `ERC20SingleRequestProxy` or an `EthereumSingleRequestProxy`, include a comment explaining that the presence of `tokenAddress` distinguishes between the two.
Learnt from: aimensahnoun
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474
File: packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts:225-228
Timestamp: 2024-10-29T08:03:10.464Z
Learning: In 'packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts' (TypeScript), when testing with an invalid proxy address, we should not use the zero address.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474
File: packages/smart-contracts/scripts/test-deploy-single-request-proxy.ts:14-32
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T20:00:25.780Z
Learning: In test files, such as `packages/smart-contracts/scripts/test-deploy-single-request-proxy.ts`, extensive error handling and input validation are considered unnecessary.
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474
File: packages/smart-contracts/scripts/test-deploy-single-request-proxy.ts:9-13
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T20:00:39.160Z
Learning: In test files within `packages/smart-contracts/scripts`, high levels of type safety are not necessary; using `any` types is acceptable.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts (1)
1-340: The test suite is comprehensive and well-structured
The tests effectively cover various scenarios for both Ethereum and ERC20 Single Request Proxies, including error handling, deployment, and payment processes. All functions are tested thoroughly, ensuring reliability and robustness of the new functionalities introduced.
MantisClone
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2024
sstefdev
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2024
aimensahnoun
deleted the
1396-support-singlerequestproxy-in-the-request-network-sdk
branch
This was referenced Oct 30, 2024
This was referenced Nov 8, 2024
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of the changes
resolve #1396
deploySingleRequestProxyfunction inpayment-processorto deploy Single Request Proxy for a request.payRequestWithSingleRequestProxyfunction inpayment-processorto easily make payments through a Single Request Proxy.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
SingleRequestProxyFactory, facilitating easier access to new payment functionalities.Bug Fixes
Tests