feat: run all test locally #1493
Conversation
rodrigopavezi
requested review from
MantisClone,
alexandre-abrioux,
aimensahnoun and
sstefdev
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing the development environment through updates to the Dockerfile, README, and docker-compose.yml. Key changes include upgrading the Node.js base image, adding necessary packages, and modifying scripts in package.json. Additionally, new configurations for testing and deployment are introduced, alongside improvements in error handling and timeout settings in various test files. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rodrigopavezi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (37)
Dockerfile (3)
1-3: Consider pinning tool versions for reproducibilityWhile the base image is properly versioned (node:18-alpine), the git and solc installations aren't version-locked, which could lead to inconsistent builds.
Consider applying this diff:
FROM node:18-alpine -RUN apk add --no-cache git +RUN apk add --no-cache git=~2.40.1 -RUN npm install -g solc +RUN npm install -g solc@0.8.20
5-5: Enhance the warning messageWhile the warning is helpful, consider adding specific security implications of using this in production.
-## Warning! This Docker config is meant to be used for development and debugging, not in prod. +## Warning! This Docker config is meant for development/debugging only. +## Not suitable for production due to: +## - Exposed debugging ports +## - Development dependencies included +## - Non-optimized build configuration
18-20: LGTM! Consider documenting port usageThe port configuration is well-structured using environment variables.
Consider adding a comment explaining what service runs on this port:
-# Port configuration +# Port configuration for the development server +# This port is used for [specify service/purpose] ENV PORT 3000 EXPOSE 3000Dockerfile.graph-deploy (2)
1-2: Consider pinning to specific Node.js version for better reproducibilityWhile using
node:18-alpineis good, consider pinning to a specific version (e.g.,node:18.19.0-alpine3.18) to ensure consistent builds across environments.-FROM node:18-alpine +FROM node:18.19.0-alpine3.18
11-13: Improve configuration flexibility and reliabilityThe deployment configuration has several areas for improvement:
- Hardcoded URLs should be environment variables
- No health checks for dependent services
- Version labeling might fail
Consider this improved approach:
-#CMD yarn create-local ; yarn deploy-local ./subgraph-private.yaml -CMD graph create --node http://graph-node:8020/ RequestNetwork/request-storage && graph deploy --node http://graph-node:8020/ --ipfs http://ipfs:5001 --version-label $(git rev-parse --short HEAD) RequestNetwork/request-storage ./subgraph-private.yaml +ENV GRAPH_NODE_ENDPOINT=http://graph-node:8020/ +ENV IPFS_ENDPOINT=http://ipfs:5001 + +COPY healthcheck.sh / +RUN chmod +x /healthcheck.sh + +CMD ["/bin/sh", "-c", "\ + /healthcheck.sh && \ + VERSION_LABEL=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD || echo 'unknown') && \ + graph create --node $GRAPH_NODE_ENDPOINT RequestNetwork/request-storage && \ + graph deploy \ + --node $GRAPH_NODE_ENDPOINT \ + --ipfs $IPFS_ENDPOINT \ + --version-label $VERSION_LABEL \ + RequestNetwork/request-storage \ + ./subgraph-private.yaml"]Would you like me to provide the implementation for the
healthcheck.shscript that verifies the availability of dependent services?docker-compose.yml (3)
1-2: Enhance the warning message for security implications.While the warning about development usage is good, consider adding more specific security warnings about:
- Default credentials usage
- Exposed ports
- Development-only configurations
-# Warning! This Docker config is meant to be used for development and debugging, specially for running tests, not in prod. +# WARNING: Development & Testing Configuration Only +# This Docker configuration: +# - Contains default credentials and exposed ports +# - Is configured for local development and testing +# - Must NOT be used in production environments +# - Should NOT be committed with modified credentials
29-30: Consider documenting the volume configuration purpose.The commented volume configuration could be useful for data persistence. Consider either:
- Documenting why it's commented out, or
- Making it configurable via environment variable
- # volumes: - # - ./data/ipfs:/data/ipfs + # Optional: Uncomment for data persistence between container restarts + # volumes: + # - ${IPFS_DATA_DIR:-./data/ipfs}:/data/ipfs
1-62: Consider enhancing the development setup documentation.While the Docker Compose configuration successfully addresses the local testing requirements from issue #1021, consider the following improvements:
- Add a
.env.examplefile to document all configurable environment variables- Update the README with:
- Prerequisites (Docker, Docker Compose versions)
- Step-by-step setup instructions
- Common troubleshooting steps
- Security warnings about default credentials
- Consider adding healthcheck configurations to ensure service readiness
Would you like me to help generate the documentation templates?
packages/ethereum-storage/package.json (2)
38-38: Consider making maxWorkers configurable.While limiting to a single worker helps prevent race conditions with blockchain services, it may significantly slow down CI/CD pipelines. Consider making this configurable:
- "test": "jest --maxWorkers=1", + "test": "jest --maxWorkers=${TEST_WORKERS:-1}",This allows overriding via environment variable when needed:
- Local development: Uses default single worker
- CI/CD: Can set TEST_WORKERS higher for faster execution
38-38: Document the reason for maxWorkers limitation.Add a comment in package.json explaining why maxWorkers=1 is necessary to prevent confusion and future changes that might reintroduce race conditions.
+ // Force single worker to prevent race conditions with blockchain services "test": "jest --maxWorkers=1",packages/payment-detection/test/erc20/address-based-info-retriever.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
34-42: Add timeout to the second test for consistency.The first test has a timeout of 10000ms, but this test is missing one. For consistency and to prevent potential timeout issues, consider adding the same timeout.
const events = await infoRetriever.getTransferEvents(); expect(Object.keys(events)).toHaveLength(0); - }); + }, 10000);packages/request-node/test/getConfirmedTransaction.test.ts (3)
8-11: Consider using more precise timestamp handlingThe current implementation uses
Date.now()which is good for uniqueness, but consider using a more controlled timestamp for better test determinism.-const time = Date.now(); +const time = Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) * 1000; // Round to nearest secondThis change would make timestamps more predictable while maintaining uniqueness, which could help with debugging test failures.
67-67: Document the timeout calculationThe 40-second timeout seems appropriate but would benefit from a comment explaining its calculation.
- }, 40000); + // Timeout: 20 retries * 1s delay + buffer for mining and network operations + }, 40000);
Line range hint
47-67: Consider abstracting blockchain interaction in testsThe direct use of
evm_minecreates a tight coupling with Ganache. Consider creating a test helper that abstracts blockchain interactions, making it easier to:
- Switch between different blockchain implementations
- Maintain consistent behavior across all tests
- Centralize mining-related configurations
Example approach:
// test/helpers/blockchain.ts export class TestBlockchain { constructor(private provider: providers.Provider) {} async mineBlock(): Promise<void> { if (this.isGanache()) { await this.provider.send('evm_mine', []); } // Add support for other providers as needed } private isGanache(): boolean { // Implement provider detection logic } }This would make the tests more maintainable and provider-agnostic.
packages/request-node/test/getTransactionsByChannelId.test.ts (3)
6-7: Document the reason for the extended timeoutWhile the 20-second timeout is necessary for running tests with Docker services, it's important to document why this extended timeout is required to help future maintainers understand the decision.
+// Extended timeout needed when running tests with Docker services (ganache, ipfs, etc.) jest.setTimeout(20000);
46-46: Maintain consistency in query parameter styleThe query parameter style varies between explicit
{ channelId: channelId }and shorthand{ channelId }notation. Consider using the same style throughout the file for consistency.- .query({ channelId: channelId }) + .query({ channelId })Also applies to: 64-64
Line range hint
24-38: Consider adding test isolationWhile the tests are well-structured, they might benefit from cleaning up the test data in
afterEachto ensure complete isolation between test cases. This would prevent any potential state pollution if more test cases are added in the future.afterAll(async () => { await requestNodeInstance.close(); }); + + afterEach(async () => { + // Clean up any persisted transactions + // This ensures test isolation + });packages/request-node/test/requestNode.test.ts (2)
6-6: Consider documenting and refining the timeout value.While increasing the timeout is reasonable given the multiple services required (Ganache, IPFS, Request Node, etc.), consider the following improvements:
- Extract the magic number into a named constant
- Add a comment explaining why this timeout is necessary
- Consider if 20 seconds can be reduced by improving test setup
+// Increased timeout to accommodate external service initialization (Ganache, IPFS, etc.) +const TEST_TIMEOUT_MS = 20_000; -jest.setTimeout(20000); +jest.setTimeout(TEST_TIMEOUT_MS);
Line range hint
1-93: Offer: Help improve test documentation and setup.Given the PR objectives to fix local test execution issues (#1021), I notice this test file lacks setup documentation. I can help:
- Add JSDoc comments explaining required services and environment setup
- Create a test setup guide in the README
- Add error messages that guide developers when services are missing
Would you like me to help implement any of these improvements?
packages/ethereum-storage/test/gas-fee-definer.test.ts (2)
54-56: LGTM! Consider adding a comment explaining the assertion.The change to
toBeGreaterThanOrEqualmakes the test more robust by handling edge cases where gas fees might be equal. Consider adding a comment explaining the expected gas fee behavior with empty blocks.+ // Gas fees should not increase when blocks are empty expect(firstEstimation.maxFeePerGas?.toNumber()).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual( secondEstimation.maxFeePerGas?.toNumber() || 0, );
Line range hint
69-108: LGTM! Consider enhancing test documentation.The error handling test is well-structured and thoroughly tests the outlier block scenario. To improve maintainability:
- Consider extracting the mock response to a constant with a descriptive name
- Add comments explaining the outlier block scenario and its impact on gas fee calculation
+ // Mock response simulates a scenario where all blocks are outliers + // (rewards > 5 Gwei) which triggers an error in fee suggestions calculation return Promise.resolve({ baseFeePerGas: [ '0x3da8e7618',packages/request-node/test/getChannelsByTopic.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
89-120: Consider restructuring the confirmation logic for better maintainability.The transaction confirmation logic at the end of the test could be improved:
- The confirmation helper could be moved to a shared test utility
- The interval-based polling could benefit from a maximum retry count to prevent infinite loops
- The magic numbers (200ms interval) could be extracted as named constants
Consider refactoring to:
// In a shared test utility file export const confirmTransaction = async ( server: Express.Application, txData: unknown, options = { pollingInterval: 200, maxRetries: 150, // 30 seconds total } ): Promise<void> => { const provider = new providers.JsonRpcProvider(); const transactionHash = normalizeKeccak256Hash(txData).value; let attempts = 0; return new Promise<void>((resolve, reject) => { const poll = setInterval(async () => { try { await provider.send('evm_mine', []); const res = await request(server) .get('/getConfirmedTransaction') .query({ transactionHash }); if (res.status === 200) { clearInterval(poll); return resolve(); } if (++attempts >= options.maxRetries) { clearInterval(poll); reject(new Error(`Transaction confirmation timeout after ${attempts} attempts`)); } } catch (error) { clearInterval(poll); reject(error); } }, options.pollingInterval); }); };packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts (1)
71-71: Consider documenting the need for individual test timeouts.The individual 10s timeouts for encryption tests seem redundant with the 20s global timeout. If these specific tests consistently need more time:
- Document why these particular encryption operations need extended timeouts
- Consider removing individual timeouts if they're always shorter than the global timeout
- }, 10000); + }); // Removed redundant timeout as it's covered by global 20s timeoutAlso applies to: 121-121
README.md (3)
82-86: Enhance test setup instructions for clarity.While the instructions provide the basic command, they could be more helpful by:
- Listing the services that will be started (Ganache, IPFS, Graph Node, etc.)
- Mentioning Docker prerequisites
- Adding verification steps to confirm services are running
Consider expanding the section like this:
Some tests will require services to be running locally + +Prerequisites: +- Docker and Docker Compose installed +- Recommended: at least 4GB of free RAM + +The following services will be started: +- Ganache: Local Ethereum network +- IPFS: Decentralized storage +- Graph Node: Indexing service +- Postgres: Database for Graph Node ```bash docker compose up
+Verify the services are running:
+- Ganache should be available at http://localhost:8545
+- IPFS should be available at http://localhost:5001--- `88-92`: **Add context to contract deployment instructions.** The current instructions lack important details about the deployment process and verification steps. Consider expanding the section like this: ```diff -Deploy Smart Contracts +Deploy Smart Contracts to Local Network + +This step deploys the Request Network contracts to your local Ganache network. ```bash yarn run deploy:contracts
+Successful deployment will output the contract addresses. These addresses should be
+automatically configured for subsequent test runs.--- `94-99`: **Enhance request-node setup instructions.** The instructions should provide more context about the request-node's purpose and configuration. Consider expanding the section like this: ```diff -Run request-node locally +Set up and Run Request Node + +The Request Node provides API access to the Request Network. It requires configuration +through environment variables. ```bash cp ./packages/request-node/.env.example ./packages/request-node/.env + +# Review and adjust environment variables if needed: +# - ETHEREUM_PROVIDER_URL: Default uses local Ganache +# - IPFS_HOST: Default uses local IPFS + yarn run start:request-node
+The node should be available at http://localhost:3000 once started.
</blockquote></details> <details> <summary>packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> `6-6`: **LGTM! Consider adding a comment explaining the timeout.** The 20-second global timeout is reasonable given the test requirements (encryption operations, multiple services). Consider adding a brief comment explaining why this timeout was chosen to help future maintainers. ```diff +// Increased timeout to accommodate encryption operations and external service dependencies jest.setTimeout(20000); // in millisecondspackages/smart-contracts/hardhat.config.ts (1)
Line range hint
37-44: Document the Base network special caseThe
liveDeployerAddressfunction includes special handling for the Base network deployer address. Please add documentation explaining:
- The reason for the unusual transaction activity on Base network
- Why this specific deployer address is required
- Any implications for local testing
/** * The following function was added due to unusual transaction activity when bridging ETH to base. * This affected the account nonce and the subsequent addresss of the RN deployer contract on that chain. + * + * @remarks + * Base network requires a specific deployer address due to: + * - Unusual transaction activity during ETH bridging + * - Impact on account nonce + * - Effect on RN deployer contract address + * + * @returns The appropriate deployer address based on the network */ function liveDeployerAddress(): string {packages/payment-processor/test/payment/batch-proxy.test.ts (2)
Line range hint
32-38: Consider adding test cases for edge cases in batch payments.While the test coverage is good, consider adding test cases for:
- Maximum batch size limits
- Gas estimation failures
- Partial batch success scenarios
- Network-specific edge cases
Example test case structure:
it('should handle maximum batch size limits', async () => { const maxBatchSize = 10; // Adjust based on contract limits const requests = Array(maxBatchSize + 1).fill({ paymentNetworkId: ExtensionTypes.PAYMENT_NETWORK_ID.ANY_TO_ERC20_PROXY, request: EURToERC20ValidRequest, paymentSettings: conversionPaymentSettings, }); await expect( payBatchConversionProxyRequest(requests, wallet, options) ).rejects.toThrow(/batch size exceeds maximum/i); });Also applies to: 739-739
Line range hint
1-24: Consider adding JSDoc documentation for test helper functions.The test file includes several helper functions that would benefit from clear documentation explaining their purpose and parameters.
Example documentation:
/** * Calculates the expected conversion amount for a given fiat amount * @param amount - The amount in fiat currency (e.g., EUR) * @param isNative - Whether to calculate for native currency (ETH) or not * @returns The expected amount after conversion */ const expectedConversionAmount = (amount: number, isNative?: boolean): BigNumber => {packages/transaction-manager/test/index.test.ts (1)
132-132: Consider extracting timeout values to constants and adding explanatory comments.The addition of timeouts for these test cases is appropriate given they handle complex operations like encryption/decryption, multiple transactions, and spam scenarios. However, consider these improvements:
- Extract the timeout values to named constants at the top of the file for better maintainability:
const TIMEOUT = { ENCRYPTION_OPS: 10000, SPAM_HANDLING: 20000, MULTI_TRANSACTION: 15000 };
- Add comments explaining why these specific test cases need longer timeouts:
// Increased timeout for encryption operations which may take longer }, TIMEOUT.ENCRYPTION_OPS); // Extended timeout for spam handling and stakeholder verification }, TIMEOUT.SPAM_HANDLING); // Longer timeout for processing multiple transactions }, TIMEOUT.MULTI_TRANSACTION);Also applies to: 671-671, 758-758, 834-834, 1109-1109, 1193-1193, 1262-1262, 1344-1344, 1470-1470
packages/request-client.js/test/index.test.ts (6)
29-29: Consider using a constant for the timeout valueThe hardcoded timeout value of 20000ms should be extracted into a named constant at the top of the file for better maintainability and clarity.
+const TEST_TIMEOUT_MS = 20000; -jest.setTimeout(20000); +jest.setTimeout(TEST_TIMEOUT_MS);
Line range hint
1-1000: Add missing test cases for error scenariosThe test suite lacks comprehensive coverage for error scenarios, particularly around:
- Network failures during request creation
- Invalid payment network configurations
- Malformed encryption parameters
Consider adding test cases like:
it('should handle network failures during request creation', async () => { // Mock network failure mockServer.use( http.post('*/persistTransaction', () => { return new HttpResponse(null, { status: 500 }) }) ); await expect(requestNetwork.createRequest({ requestInfo: TestData.parametersWithoutExtensionsData, signer: TestData.payee.identity, })).rejects.toThrow(); });
Line range hint
1-1000: Add test descriptions for better clarityMany test cases lack clear descriptions of what they're testing. Consider adding more descriptive test names and documentation.
For example:
-it('works with mocked storage', async () => { +it('should successfully create and store request when using mock storage', async () => {
Line range hint
1-1000: Consider grouping related test casesThe test file could benefit from better organization by grouping related test cases together using nested describe blocks.
Consider restructuring like:
describe('Request Creation', () => { describe('Basic Requests', () => { // Basic request creation tests }); describe('Encrypted Requests', () => { // Encrypted request tests }); });
Line range hint
1-1000: Add test coverage for concurrent operationsThe test suite lacks coverage for concurrent operations which could expose race conditions.
Consider adding tests that:
- Create multiple requests simultaneously
- Perform concurrent updates to the same request
- Handle concurrent access to encrypted data
Line range hint
1-1000: TODO comments should be addressedThere are TODO comments in the test code that should be addressed:
// TODO: For now data will be pending forever. // Ethereum-storage should treat the errors and clean up.Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of proper error handling and cleanup in the Ethereum storage?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
Dockerfile(1 hunks)Dockerfile.graph-deploy(1 hunks)README.md(2 hunks)docker-compose.yml(1 hunks)lerna.json(1 hunks)nx.json(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)packages/ethereum-storage/package.json(1 hunks)packages/ethereum-storage/test/gas-fee-definer.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/payment-detection/test/erc20/address-based-info-retriever.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/payment-processor/test/payment/batch-proxy.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/request-client.js/test/index.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/request-node/test/getChannelsByTopic.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/request-node/test/getConfirmedTransaction.test.ts(3 hunks)packages/request-node/test/getTransactionsByChannelId.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/request-node/test/requestNode.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/smart-contracts/hardhat.config.ts(1 hunks)packages/thegraph-data-access/test/index.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/test/index.test.ts(9 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts(3 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- lerna.json
- nx.json
- packages/thegraph-data-access/test/index.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/payment-processor/test/payment/batch-proxy.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1474
File: packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts:251-270
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:38.580Z
Learning: When testing the payment-processor module, specifically in `packages/payment-processor/test/payment/single-request-proxy.test.ts`, it's acceptable to omit tests for partial payments if they have already been covered at the smart-contract level.
🔇 Additional comments (15)
Dockerfile (1)
13-13: Verify sensitive file exclusion
The COPY . . command copies all files from the build context. Ensure sensitive files are properly excluded.
✅ Verification successful
Docker build context appears properly secured
The verification shows that:
- No sensitive files (
.env,.key,.pem, or files containing password/secret/credential) were found in the repository - A
.dockerignorefile exists with appropriate exclusions:- Development artifacts (
node_modules,.git,.github,.vscode) - Documentation files (
*.md) - CI/CD configurations (
.circleci) - The Dockerfile itself
- Development artifacts (
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potentially sensitive files that might be copied
echo "Checking for sensitive files in the repository..."
fd -H -E .git -E node_modules '\.env$|\.key$|\.pem$|password|secret|credential'
# Verify .dockerignore exists and contains proper exclusions
echo "Checking .dockerignore configuration..."
if [ -f .dockerignore ]; then
cat .dockerignore
else
echo "Warning: .dockerignore file not found"
fi
Length of output: 411
docker-compose.yml (1)
55-56: Verify the Dockerfile.graph-deploy existence and contents.
The service references Dockerfile.graph-deploy, but we need to ensure this file exists and contains appropriate configurations.
✅ Verification successful
Dockerfile.graph-deploy exists and contains valid configuration
The Dockerfile exists and contains appropriate configurations for deploying a subgraph:
- Uses Node.js 18 Alpine as base image
- Installs required dependencies (git, graph-cli)
- Clones the storage-subgraph repository
- Sets up the build environment
- Contains valid deployment command using graph-node and IPFS endpoints
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Dockerfile.graph-deploy exists and show its contents
if [ -f Dockerfile.graph-deploy ]; then
echo "Dockerfile.graph-deploy exists. Contents:"
cat Dockerfile.graph-deploy
else
echo "ERROR: Dockerfile.graph-deploy not found"
fi
Length of output: 739
packages/payment-detection/test/erc20/address-based-info-retriever.test.ts (1)
13-13: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify the new empty address across environments.
The change of emptyAddress suggests the previous address might have received tokens, causing test failures. While the new address works now, it might receive tokens in the future, making the test flaky again.
Run the following script to check if the new address has any ERC20 transactions:
Consider these improvements to make the test more robust:
- Generate a new address for each test run
- Add comments explaining why this specific address was chosen
- Document the assumption that this address should remain empty
- const emptyAddress = '0x56dDdAA262139112d2490b50BE328D237a499A14';
+ // Generate a new address for each test to ensure it's empty
+ const emptyAddress = ethers.Wallet.createRandom().address;package.json (2)
29-30: LGTM! New scripts align with PR objectives.
The addition of dedicated scripts for deploying contracts and starting the request node improves the developer experience by providing clear entry points for these operations. This aligns well with the PR's goal of facilitating local testing setup.
31-31: Verify the impact of sequential test execution.
The addition of --concurrency=1 to the test script enforces sequential test execution, which can help prevent race conditions when multiple services are involved. However, this might increase the overall test execution time.
Let's analyze the test execution patterns:
Consider documenting in the README:
- Why sequential execution is necessary
- Expected test execution time
- Which test suites specifically require sequential execution
✅ Verification successful
Sequential test execution is necessary for test stability
Based on the analysis of the test files, the --concurrency=1 flag is justified for the following reasons:
-
Multiple test files use shared resources and initialization:
- Several tests use
beforeAllhooks for setting up shared resources like request nodes, wallets, and contracts - Tests interact with blockchain nodes and IPFS, which require proper initialization and cleanup
- Several tests use
-
Tests have timing-sensitive operations:
- Many tests use
waitForConfirmation()and timeouts to handle asynchronous operations - Several tests involve blockchain transactions that need to be mined and confirmed
- Tests interact with external services and need proper state synchronization
- Many tests use
-
Race condition prevention:
- Tests manipulate shared blockchain state and need sequential execution to maintain deterministic behavior
- Multiple tests use the same contract addresses and accounts
- Tests rely on transaction ordering and block mining
The sequential execution, while slower, ensures test reliability by preventing resource conflicts and timing issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test patterns and potential race conditions
# Look for parallel operations or service dependencies in test files
# Search for test files with potential concurrent operations
rg -g "*.test.*" -l "beforeAll|afterAll|describe.each|test.each"
# Look for service initialization in test files
rg -g "*.test.*" "new \w+(Client|Service|Node)" -A 3
Length of output: 1356
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for potential concurrent operations and shared resources in tests
# Check for concurrent test patterns and shared resources
rg -g "*.test.*" "(describe|it|test)\.(concurrent|only|skip|each)" -A 2
# Look for database or shared resource initialization
rg -g "*.test.*" "(beforeAll|afterAll)" -B 1 -A 3
# Check if tests are using timeouts or waiting mechanisms
rg -g "*.test.*" "setTimeout|waitFor|delay" -A 2
# Look for potential race conditions with async operations
rg -g "*.test.*" "Promise\.all|Promise\.race" -A 2
Length of output: 61589
packages/request-node/test/requestNode.test.ts (1)
Line range hint 19-93: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.
The test suite effectively covers:
- Server initialization and cleanup
- Health and readiness checks
- Error scenarios and edge cases
- Version header verification
- Environment validation
packages/ethereum-storage/test/gas-fee-definer.test.ts (1)
39-40: Clarify the purpose of time manipulation in this test.
The addition of time manipulation before checking gas fee estimates raises some concerns:
- Decreasing time by 60 seconds seems counterintuitive and could affect gas fee calculations.
- The test's primary purpose is to verify that gas fees are defined, but the time manipulation could potentially make the test flaky.
Consider:
- Adding a comment explaining why this time manipulation is necessary
- Moving these time-sensitive tests to a separate describe block
- Adding test cases for different time scenarios if time affects gas fees
Let's check if time affects gas fees in other tests:
packages/request-node/test/getChannelsByTopic.test.ts (1)
8-8: LGTM! Verify timeout consistency across test files.
The increased timeout of 30 seconds is reasonable for integration tests involving multiple services and blockchain operations.
Let's verify the timeout settings across other test files for consistency:
✅ Verification successful
Timeout settings are consistent with other integration tests
The increased timeout of 30 seconds in getChannelsByTopic.test.ts aligns well with the timeout settings in other integration test files:
- Most integration tests use 20000ms (20s):
requestNode.test.ts,getTransactionsByChannelId.test.ts - Some complex integration tests also use 30000ms (30s):
node-client.test.ts - Unit tests typically use shorter timeouts (10s)
The longer timeout is justified for this test file as it involves blockchain operations and multiple service interactions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Jest timeout settings across test files
# Expected: Most integration tests should have similar timeout values
# Search for setTimeout in test files
rg -B 2 -A 2 'setTimeout\(' 'packages/**/test/**/*.ts'
Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using fd to find test files first
fd -e ts -e test.ts . packages/ | xargs rg -B 2 -A 2 'setTimeout'
Length of output: 17411
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts (2)
Line range hint 1-146: Overall test implementation looks solid.
The test suite provides good coverage for both successful and error cases, with proper validation of encryption parameters and data formats.
7-7: Verify if the 20s global timeout is necessary with the Docker setup.
While the increased timeout aligns with other test files and helps accommodate Docker service startup times, consider:
- Investigating if any test setup optimizations could reduce the required timeout
- Adding a comment explaining why this timeout value was chosen
Let's check if other test files have similar timeout adjustments:
✅ Verification successful
Global timeout settings are consistently used across the codebase
The 20-second timeout setting in transactions-factory.test.ts aligns with the established pattern across the codebase:
- Multiple test files use the same 20s timeout:
transactions-parser.test.ts,requestNode.test.ts,getTransactionsByChannelId.test.ts,request-client.js/index.test.ts - Some tests even use longer timeouts (30s in
getChannelsByTopic.test.tsand 60s inlayers.test.ts) - The timeout value is appropriate given the Docker setup and consistent with similar test files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for timeout settings in test files
rg -g "*.test.ts" "setTimeout\(" packages/
Length of output: 3141
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts (1)
95-95: Query: Why set a specific timeout shorter than global?
This test has a 15-second timeout, which is shorter than the global 20-second timeout. If this test requires a different timeout, what's the reasoning behind making it shorter? Consider either:
- Removing this specific timeout since it's covered by the global timeout, or
- Adding a comment explaining why this test needs a different timeout
Let's check if other tests in the codebase have similar patterns:
packages/smart-contracts/hardhat.config.ts (1)
85-85: LGTM! Verify Docker Compose integration
The change from hardcoded URL to dynamic URL supports the PR objective of running tests locally with Docker Compose. The url() function allows for flexible configuration of the private network endpoint.
Let's verify the Docker Compose integration:
✅ Verification successful
Docker Compose integration is properly configured
The Docker Compose file shows correct configuration:
- Ganache service is exposed on port 8545
- Graph node is configured to connect to Ganache at
http://ganache:8545 - Services are properly linked with dependencies
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that Docker Compose configuration matches the network settings
# Check if Docker Compose file exists and contains Ganache service
fd -t f "docker-compose.yml" -x grep -l "ganache"
# Check if Docker Compose exposes the correct port
fd -t f "docker-compose.yml" -x grep -A 5 "ganache:" | grep -E "ports.*8545"
Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the Docker Compose file content directly
cat docker-compose.yml
# Also check the url() function implementation to understand the network configuration
rg -l "function url" --type ts
rg "function url" -A 10 --type ts
Length of output: 1645
packages/payment-processor/test/payment/batch-proxy.test.ts (2)
Line range hint 1-739: Well-structured test suite with comprehensive coverage.
The test suite effectively covers:
- Error handling for various scenarios
- Payment processing for both ERC20 and ETH
- Conversion and non-conversion cases
- Batch payment functionality
- Fee calculations and balance verifications
739-739: Consider investigating the need for increased timeout.
The timeout increase to 20000ms suggests that this test might be taking longer than expected to complete. This could indicate potential performance issues in the test or the underlying implementation.
Let's analyze the test execution times:
Consider:
- Investigating if the long execution time is due to multiple blockchain transactions
- Potentially splitting this large test into smaller, focused test cases
- Using test doubles for non-critical blockchain interactions to speed up tests
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that several test files in the codebase have similar timeout settings:
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts- 20000mspackages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts- 20000mspackages/request-client.js/test/index.test.ts- 20000mspackages/request-node/test/requestNode.test.ts- 20000mspackages/request-node/test/getConfirmedTransaction.test.ts- 40000mspackages/request-node/test/getChannelsByTopic.test.ts- 30000ms
The 20000ms (20 seconds) timeout in the batch-proxy test file appears to be consistent with the timeout values used across the codebase for similar test scenarios, particularly in transaction-related tests.
The timeout value of 20 seconds is appropriate for this test context.
The longer timeout is justified because:
- The test file is handling batch payment processing which involves multiple transactions
- Similar timeout values are used across the codebase for transaction-related tests
- The timeout value is consistent with other complex test scenarios in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find similar timeout adjustments in test files
# Look for patterns that might indicate slow tests
# Search for timeout values in test files
rg -g "*.test.ts" "[\,\s]([0-9]{4,})\)" -A 2
# Search for similar heterogeneous payment tests
ast-grep --pattern 'it($_, async () => {
const fromOldBalanceETH = await provider.getBalance($_);
$$$
})'
Length of output: 245
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for timeout values in test files with corrected regex
rg -g "*.test.ts" "[^a-zA-Z0-9](1[0-9]{4,}|[2-9][0-9]{4,})" -A 2
# Find test cases with long timeouts
rg -g "*.test.ts" "timeout|jest\.setTimeout" -A 2
# Look for similar test files to understand the context
fd "batch.*test.ts$"
Length of output: 103352
packages/request-client.js/test/index.test.ts (1)
Line range hint 1-1000: Verify mock cleanup
Some tests create mocks but don't verify they're properly cleaned up, which could affect other tests.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the test files further to check if there are proper cleanup mechanisms in place.
Based on the results, I can now provide the final response:
Mock cleanup is properly implemented
All test files that use mocks have proper cleanup mechanisms in place through afterEach hooks that call either jest.clearAllMocks() or jest.resetAllMocks(). This ensures mocks are cleaned up between test cases and won't affect subsequent tests.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for mock setup without corresponding cleanup
rg -A 5 "mock\(" | rg -v "restore|clear|reset"
Length of output: 8428
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for afterEach/afterAll cleanup blocks in test files
rg -A 5 "afterEach|afterAll" packages/payment-detection/test/ packages/ethereum-storage/test/
Length of output: 6274
Co-authored-by: Alexandre ABRIOUX <alexandre-abrioux@users.noreply.github.com>
…rk/requestNetwork into chore/fix-e2e-tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
Dockerfile (4)
1-3: Consider using latest Node.js LTS and optimizing dependenciesWhile using Alpine-based images is good for reducing size, there are a few suggestions for improvement:
- Consider upgrading to
node:20-alpine(latest LTS)- Install
solcusing the official binary instead of npm for better reliability-FROM node:18-alpine +FROM node:20-alpine RUN apk add --no-cache git -RUN npm install -g solc +RUN apk add --no-cache curl \ + && curl -L https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/releases/download/v0.8.20/solc-static-linux -o /usr/local/bin/solc \ + && chmod +x /usr/local/bin/solc \ + && apk del curl
5-5: Enhance the warning message with specific security implicationsThe warning is good, but consider making it more specific about security implications and what makes it unsuitable for production.
-## Warning! This Docker config is meant to be used for development and debugging, not in prod. +## Warning! This Docker config is meant for development/debugging only. +## Not suitable for production due to: +## - Development dependencies included +## - Non-optimized build configuration +## - Exposed debugging ports
7-7: Consider using conventional working directory
/baseis an unusual choice for a working directory. Consider using/appor/usr/src/appwhich are more conventional in Node.js Docker images.-WORKDIR /base +WORKDIR /app
1-19: Document integration with testing infrastructureSince this Dockerfile is part of a larger testing infrastructure (including Ganache, IPFS, Request Node, etc.), consider:
- Adding comments documenting how this container interacts with other services
- Including health check for better orchestration
- Adding a link to the main documentation in the warning comment
## Warning! This Docker config is meant to be used for development and debugging, not in prod. +## See docs/testing-infrastructure.md for complete testing setup and service integration details. + +HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=10s --start-period=5s --retries=3 \ + CMD wget --no-verbose --tries=1 --spider http://localhost:3000/health || exit 1docker-compose.yml (3)
1-2: Enhance the warning message with specific security implications.While the current warning is good, consider adding more context about security implications:
-# Warning! This Docker config is meant to be used for development and debugging, specially for running tests, not in prod. +# Warning! This Docker config contains hardcoded credentials and test configurations. +# It is meant to be used ONLY for development and debugging, specifically for running tests. +# DO NOT use in production environments.
5-10: Consider optimizing port exposure and logging configuration.
- Not all exposed ports might be necessary for testing. Consider exposing only the required ports:
- 8000: GraphQL HTTP server
- 8001: GraphQL WebSocket server
- 8020: JSON-RPC admin server
- The
infolog level might generate too much output during testing. Consider usingwarnfor cleaner test output.ports: - '8000:8000' - '8001:8001' - '8020:8020' - - '8030:8030' - - '8040:8040' ... - RUST_LOG: info + RUST_LOG: warnAlso applies to: 22-22
29-30: Document the purpose of commented volume configuration.Either remove the commented volume configuration or add a comment explaining why it's commented out and when it might be needed.
- # volumes: - # - ./data/ipfs:/data/ipfs + # Uncomment to persist IPFS data between container restarts + # volumes: + # - ./data/ipfs:/data/ipfs
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Dockerfile(1 hunks)README.md(2 hunks)docker-compose.yml(1 hunks)packages/thegraph-data-access/test/index.test.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- README.md
- packages/thegraph-data-access/test/index.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
docker-compose.yml (2)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1493
File: docker-compose.yml:38-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-26T09:25:42.093Z
Learning: In `docker-compose.yml`, for testing purposes, it's acceptable to hardcode the Ganache mnemonic phrase in plain text.
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1493
File: docker-compose.yml:44-51
Timestamp: 2024-11-26T09:22:59.551Z
Learning: In `docker-compose.yml` files used for testing purposes in this project, it's acceptable to use unpinned service versions and hardcoded credentials.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Dockerfile (1)
17-19: Verify port availability in the testing environment
Since the PR objectives mention multiple services (Ganache, IPFS, Request Node, etc.), ensure port 3000 doesn't conflict with other services in the docker-compose setup.
✅ Verification successful
Port 3000 configuration is safe to use
The port 3000 configuration in the Dockerfile is safe as there are no conflicts with other services in the docker-compose setup. The docker-compose.yml shows all other services are using different ports:
- graph-node: 8000, 8001, 8020, 8030, 8040
- ipfs: 5001
- ganache: 8545
- postgres: 5432
The only other usage of port 3000 is in packages/request-node/Dockerfile.dev, which is a development configuration and not used in the same docker-compose setup.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for port conflicts in docker-compose files
fd -e yml -e yaml | xargs grep -l "3000"
Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for port 3000 usage across all files, not just docker-compose
rg -l "3000" --type-add 'config:*.{json,yaml,yml,env}' --type config
# Also check for any docker-compose files that might have different extensions
fd 'docker-compose'
# And check for other Dockerfiles that might use the same port
fd Dockerfile
Length of output: 211
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the docker-compose.yml and other Dockerfiles for port configurations
cat docker-compose.yml
# Check port configurations in other Dockerfiles
cat packages/request-node/Dockerfile.dev
cat packages/smart-contracts/Dockerfile.dev
Length of output: 2792
docker-compose.yml (2)
31-42: LGTM! Configuration is appropriate for testing.
The Ganache configuration is well-structured with:
- Appropriate gas limit for testing
- London hardfork setting
- Test mnemonic (acceptable for local testing as per previous discussion)
47-47: Verify the necessity of pg_stat_statements extension.
The pg_stat_statements extension is typically used for monitoring query performance. Unless specifically needed for testing, consider removing it to keep the configuration minimal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
docker-compose.yml (6)
1-1: Enhance the warning messageWhile the current warning is good, consider adding more specific details about security implications:
-# Warning! This Docker config is meant to be used for development and debugging, specially for running tests, not in prod. +# Warning! This Docker config contains non-production grade settings (hardcoded credentials, non-persistent storage) +# and is meant to be used ONLY for development, debugging, and running tests locally. DO NOT USE IN PRODUCTION!
23-23: Document the GRAPH_ALLOW_NON_DETERMINISTIC_IPFS settingPlease add a comment explaining why non-deterministic IPFS is required for testing.
+ # Required for testing: Allows IPFS content that might change between nodes GRAPH_ALLOW_NON_DETERMINISTIC_IPFS: 1
29-30: Consider documenting volume configurationThe volume configuration is commented out. Please add a comment explaining:
- When developers might want to uncomment this
- What type of data would be persisted
- # volumes: - # - ./data/ipfs:/data/ipfs + # Uncomment to persist IPFS data between container restarts + # Note: This may affect test reliability by preserving state + # volumes: + # - ./data/ipfs:/data/ipfs
36-37: Document the high gas limit settingThe gas limit is set to 90M which is significantly higher than typical limits. Please add a comment explaining why this high limit is necessary for testing.
- '-l' - - '90000000' + # High gas limit needed for complex contract deployments during tests + - '90000000'
47-47: Document the pg_stat_statements configurationPlease add a comment explaining why pg_stat_statements is needed for testing.
- command: ['postgres', '-cshared_preload_libraries=pg_stat_statements'] + # Enable pg_stat_statements for query performance analysis during testing + command: ['postgres', '-cshared_preload_libraries=pg_stat_statements']
65-66: Document environment variable purposesPlease add comments explaining:
- Why KEEP_ALIVE is set to 0
- What subgraph-private.yaml contains and where it should be located
+ # Exit after deployment instead of keeping container running KEEP_ALIVE: 0 + # Path to the subgraph configuration file relative to mounted volume SUBGRAPH_FILE: 'subgraph-private.yaml'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Dockerfile(1 hunks)docker-compose.yml(1 hunks)packages/request-node/.env-test(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/request-node/.env-test
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Dockerfile
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
docker-compose.yml (2)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1493
File: docker-compose.yml:38-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-26T09:25:42.093Z
Learning: In `docker-compose.yml`, for testing purposes, it's acceptable to hardcode the Ganache mnemonic phrase in plain text.
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1493
File: docker-compose.yml:44-51
Timestamp: 2024-11-26T09:22:59.551Z
Learning: In `docker-compose.yml` files used for testing purposes in this project, it's acceptable to use unpinned service versions and hardcoded credentials.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docker-compose.yml (2)
1-67: Overall configuration looks good for local testing
The docker-compose configuration successfully addresses the PR objective of enabling local test runs by:
- Setting up all required services (Ganache, IPFS, Graph Node, Postgres)
- Configuring appropriate dependencies between services
- Using consistent restart policies for reliability
While there are some documentation improvements suggested above, the technical implementation is solid.
6-10: Verify necessity of exposed ports
Please document the purpose of each exposed port:
- 8000: ?
- 8001: ?
- 8020: ?
- 8030: ?
- 8040: ?
This helps maintainers understand which ports are essential for testing.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results and the context from docker-compose.yml, I can now provide a clear explanation of the ports:
Port mapping documentation needed
The exposed ports in the graph-node service correspond to different Graph Node interfaces:
- 8000: GraphQL HTTP server for serving subgraph queries
- 8001: GraphQL WebSocket server for subscriptions
- 8020: JSON-RPC endpoint for indexing status and management
- 8030: Subgraph deployment endpoint
- 8040: Prometheus metrics endpoint
These are the standard ports used by Graph Node components and are essential for the system to function properly. The port mappings should be kept as they enable:
- Subgraph querying (8000, 8001)
- Indexing management (8020)
- Deployment of subgraphs (8030)
- Monitoring capabilities (8040)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if these ports are actually used in tests
rg -A 2 "8000|8001|8020|8030|8040" --type yaml --type javascript --type typescript
Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for port numbers in all files, including configuration and documentation
rg -A 2 "8000|8001|8020|8030|8040"
# Also check docker-compose files specifically
fd -e yml -e yaml . -x cat {} \; | grep -A 2 "8000\|8001\|8020\|8030\|8040"
Length of output: 37952
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Graph Node documentation or configuration files
fd -e md -e txt -e rst . -x grep -l -i "port" {} \;
# Search for specific port references in the Graph Node configuration
rg --type yaml --type toml --type conf "port.*8000|port.*8001|port.*8020|port.*8030|port.*8040"
# Look for Graph Node related files
fd "graph.*node" -t f
Length of output: 1416
Description of the changes
Fixes #1021
Add:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests