Rust 1.70.0 #1017
Merged
Rust 1.70.0 #1017
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`rust-next` is getting Rust 1.70.0 soon, thus upgrade it here too (with the extra `alloc` bits, as usual). This also aligns all branches to a single Rust version. Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Introduced in Rust 1.69.0 [1], this lint prevents forgetting to set the C ABI when using `#[no_mangle]` (or thinking it is implied). For instance, it would have prevented the issue [2] fixed by commit c682e4c ("rust: kernel: Mark rust_fmt_argument as extern "C""). error: `#[no_mangle]` set on a function with the default (`Rust`) ABI --> rust/kernel/print.rs:21:1 | 21 | / unsafe fn rust_fmt_argument( 22 | | buf: *mut c_char, 23 | | end: *mut c_char, 24 | | ptr: *const c_void, 25 | | ) -> *mut c_char { | |________________^ | = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#no_mangle_with_rust_abi = note: requested on the command line with `-D clippy::no-mangle-with-rust-abi` help: set an ABI | 21 | unsafe extern "C" fn rust_fmt_argument( | ++++++++++ help: or explicitly set the default | 21 | unsafe extern "Rust" fn rust_fmt_argument( | +++++++++++++ Thus enable it. In some cases, we need to use the Rust ABI even with `#[no_mangle]`, and for that, one may use `extern "Rust"` explicitly, but `rustfmt` overwrites it (and there does not seem to be an option to prevent that: `force_explicit_abi` does not allow to control that part, and even if it did, or if there was another option, we may not use it, since so far we have been using the defaults). Therefore, use `allow`s instead for the few cases we had. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#10347 [1] Link: Rust-for-Linux#967 [2] Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.5.2&search=force_explicit_abi#force_explicit_abi [3] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Due to the `eh_frame` issue [1]. They may be re-enabled in Rust 1.72.0. Link: Rust-for-Linux#1012 [1] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
rust-nextis getting Rust 1.70.0 soon, thus upgrade it here too (with the extraallocbits, as usual).This also aligns all branches to a single Rust version (for e.g. KernelCI/0-Day purposes).