-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Better Steady State Adjoint #93
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #93 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 97.92% 95.65% -2.28%
==========================================
Files 9 9
Lines 241 207 -34
==========================================
- Hits 236 198 -38
- Misses 5 9 +4
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
e7b047a
to
1903cfa
Compare
With SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl#918 this should be done |
Why is a special adjoint still needed? |
09f11bf
to
4d6c1ed
Compare
There is no special adjoint. I just migrated to using the non-component arrays version |
The name is from the SciMLSensitivity change 😅 |
80a2aad
to
66ecf1b
Compare
Needs to wait till LuxDL/Lux.jl#425 is merged |
66ecf1b
to
34932dc
Compare
Sister PR to SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl#877
- [ ] Compare the improved SSAdjoint MethodsFast DEQ Solves using JNFK