Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add support for chains #413

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024
Merged

feat: add support for chains #413

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

Behzad-rabiei
Copy link
Member

@Behzad-rabiei Behzad-rabiei commented Nov 26, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Expanded support for profile retrieval across multiple blockchain networks by updating the supported chain IDs.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved logic for fetching profiles, ensuring compatibility with the newly supported chain IDs.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the getProfiles function in the src/services/nft.service.ts file by updating the supportedChainIds array from a single value of [11155111] to two values, [84532, 42161]. This change affects how profiles are retrieved based on the supported chain IDs, allowing the function to iterate over the new array to fetch profiles from the ociService. No other functions or logic were altered, and the overall structure remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/services/nft.service.ts Updated supportedChainIds in getProfiles from [11155111] to [84532, 42161] for profile retrieval logic.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: fix ociBackend url #406: The changes in the getProfiles function in src/services/oci.service.ts are related because they both involve the getProfiles function, which is crucial for retrieving profiles based on chain IDs, linking the logic of profile retrieval in both services.

Poem

🐇 In the land of chains so bright,
Two IDs now take flight!
Profiles gather, hop and play,
Fetching data, come what may.
With every call, a new delight,
In the NFT world, all feels right! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Behzad-rabiei Behzad-rabiei merged commit 4131e75 into main Nov 26, 2024
13 checks passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/services/nft.service.ts (3)

Line range hint 58-61: Add error handling for chain-specific failures

The current implementation doesn't handle chain-specific failures gracefully. If one chain fails, the entire operation fails.

Consider this approach:

   let profiles: Array<any> = [];
   const supportedChainIds = [84532, 42161];
   for (let i = 0; i < supportedChainIds.length; i++) {
+    try {
       const chainProfiles = await ociService.getProfiles(address, supportedChainIds[i]);
       profiles = profiles.concat(chainProfiles);
+    } catch (error) {
+      logger.error(`Failed to fetch profiles for chain ${supportedChainIds[i]}: ${error}`);
+      // Continue with other chains instead of failing completely
+      continue;
+    }
   }
+  if (profiles.length === 0) {
+    throw new ApiError(httpStatus.SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE, 'Failed to fetch profiles from any chain');
+  }
   return profiles;

Line range hint 58-61: Consider performance optimization for parallel chain queries

The current sequential chain querying could be optimized using Promise.all for parallel execution.

Consider this optimization:

   let profiles: Array<any> = [];
   const supportedChainIds = [84532, 42161];
-  for (let i = 0; i < supportedChainIds.length; i++) {
-    const chainProfiles = await ociService.getProfiles(address, supportedChainIds[i]);
-    profiles = profiles.concat(chainProfiles);
-  }
+  const chainPromises = supportedChainIds.map(chainId => 
+    ociService.getProfiles(address, chainId)
+      .catch(error => {
+        logger.error(`Failed to fetch profiles for chain ${chainId}: ${error}`);
+        return [];
+      })
+  );
+  const results = await Promise.all(chainPromises);
+  profiles = results.flat();
   return profiles;

Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:

Mixing of testnet and mainnet chains confirmed as a critical issue

The codebase shows that chain IDs 84532 (Base Sepolia testnet) and 42161 (Arbitrum One mainnet) are hardcoded in src/services/nft.service.ts without any environment-based configuration. The ociService.getProfiles() function fetches and combines data from both chains indiscriminately, which could lead to:

  • Mixing of test and production NFT profile data
  • Inconsistent data states between environments
  • Potential security risks when handling mainnet data in test environments
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 57-61: Review mixing of testnet and mainnet chains

The current implementation mixes Base Sepolia (testnet, 84532) with Arbitrum One (mainnet, 42161). This could lead to unexpected behavior by combining test and production data.


Let me gather more context about chain IDs usage in the codebase to better understand the environment setup.


Let me check for any environment-specific configurations or constants that might indicate intended chain usage.


Let me check for any configuration files or environment variables that might define the chain IDs.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other instances of these chain IDs to understand the context
rg -l "84532|42161" --type ts

Length of output: 59


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for chain ID related configurations and constants
rg -A 5 "chainId|ChainId|CHAIN_ID|Chain_ID" --type ts

Length of output: 1184


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for environment configurations and chain-related constants
rg -A 3 "production|mainnet|testnet|development|staging" --type ts

Length of output: 3399


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for configuration files and environment variables related to chains
rg -A 3 "chain.*config|CHAIN" --type-add 'config:*.{ts,js,json,env}' --type config

Length of output: 84

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ba9d132 and 6e47a8e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/services/nft.service.ts (1 hunks)

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ const getReputationScore = async (tokenId: string, address: string) => {

async function getProfiles(address: string) {
let profiles: Array<any> = [];
const supportedChainIds = [11155111];
const supportedChainIds = [84532, 42161];
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider moving chain IDs to configuration

The hard-coded chain IDs should be moved to a configuration file for better maintainability and environment-specific settings.

- const supportedChainIds = [84532, 42161];
+ const supportedChainIds = config.chains.supported;

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant