Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add DateTimeConverter #234

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 19, 2017
Merged

Add DateTimeConverter #234

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 19, 2017

Conversation

justinyoo
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in #231 , I'd like to send this PR for DateTimeConverter. It would be great if you have a review and merge it.

What it does are:

  • It accepts DateTimeKind.Utc and Standard Date and Time Format Strings of "G" as its default parameters, if they are omitted.
  • For deserialisation, it accepts as many number of formats as we want. If a value doesn't match against provided formats, it will return FormatException. Please refer to my whole test cases.
  • For serialisation, it only considers the first format in the format list.

Here are examples of usage:

datetime: 2016-12-31 12:34:56
var builder = new DeserializerBuilder()
    .WithNamingConvention(new CamelCateNamingConvention())
    .WithTypeConverter(new DateTimeConverter(DateTimeKind.Utc, new[] { "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss" });

var deserialiser = builder.Build();

var deserislised = deserialiser.Deserialize<TestObject>(yaml);
var builder = new SerializerBuilder()
    .WithNamingConvention(new CamelCateNamingConvention())
    .WithTypeConverter(new DateTimeConverter(DateTimeKind.Utc, new[] { "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss" });

var serialiser = builder.Build();

var serialised = serialiser.Serialize(deserialised);

Please note: According to Standard Date and Time Format Strings, there's no difference between "F" and "U", in terms of string representation. Therefore, if both are provided into the converter at the same time, it will return unexpected result.

Copy link
Owner

@aaubry aaubry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this. I added a few comments. Can you take a look at them?

/// </summary>
public class DateTimeConverter : IYamlTypeConverter
{
private readonly DateTimeKind _kind;
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't prefix members with underscores in this project. Please remove them to ensure consistency with the codebase.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, I overlooked that convention. Sorry about that. I'll remove those underscore prefixes.

var value = ((Scalar)parser.Current).Value;
var style = this._kind == DateTimeKind.Local ? DateTimeStyles.AssumeLocal : DateTimeStyles.AssumeUniversal;

var dt = DateTime.ParseExact(value, this._formats, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, style);
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we allow to specify the culture that is to be used for reading and writing? What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@justinyoo justinyoo Jan 13, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also thought about that and concluded to keep invariant culture as I thought it should not be culture-specific.

However, as soon as I read your comment, an idea popped up on top of my head. I'll update the DateTimeConverter class to pass CultureInfo value to handle specific culture, like DateTimeKind value. But I'd still like to keep CultureInfo.InvariantCulture as its default value, if no CultureInfo value is provided. How does it sound to you?

- Added IFormatProvider to specify culture
- Updated private fields not using prefixes to meet coding conventions
@justinyoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aaubry As requested, I've made some changes.

@justinyoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aaubry Could you run the build at AppVeyor again? It should pass all tests as I ran the test same way as what the build process did. I used xunit.runner.console.2.2.0-beta2-build3300\tools\xunit.console.x86.exe and all tests passed, by the way.

@justinyoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

justinyoo commented Jan 18, 2017

@aaubry FYI, I've run this build against my forked branch on AppVeyor and confirm the build passed the test. For some reason, the build process was interrupted at that time.

https://ci.appveyor.com/project/justinyoo/yamldotnet/build/4.0.1-pre1

Could you run the build, https://ci.appveyor.com/project/aaubry/yamldotnet/build/4.0.1-pre314, again at your end, please?

@aaubry
Copy link
Owner

aaubry commented Jan 18, 2017

I was unable to reply sooner, sorry. I ran the tests locally and the test fails occasionally. But if I run the tests again, they pass. I'm not really sure what's going on, but I'll investigate further.

@aaubry aaubry merged commit 3158fa3 into aaubry:master Jan 19, 2017
@aaubry
Copy link
Owner

aaubry commented Jan 19, 2017

I have updated FakeItEasy to version 2.3.3 and now it seems that the tests always pass.
I'll do a release soon that will include this change. Thanks

@aaubry
Copy link
Owner

aaubry commented May 11, 2017

Hi, @justinyoo, I noticed recently, while working on #255, that some of the DateTime tests fail on Linux with Mono. I had to comment out some of them, apparently the ones that use the Korean AM/PM designator. I thought that maybe you knew of a workaround? Thanks

@justinyoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aaubry ORLY? Yeah, for now you can comment that out. Seems that tests only fail where AM/PM designator exists. I'll have a look.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants