Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conform approach for passing native SDK generated errors on #10

Closed
QuintinWillison opened this issue May 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed
Labels
enhancement New feature or improved functionality.

Comments

@QuintinWillison
Copy link
Contributor

QuintinWillison commented May 7, 2020

See this thread for the discussion that prompted the creation of this issue.

Please ping me when starting work on this so we can discuss approach at that time.

┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Story by Unito

@tiholic tiholic added the enhancement New feature or improved functionality. label Aug 18, 2020
QuintinWillison added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 19, 2021
Hoping to solve this error in workflow environment:

Unhandled exception:
Invalid argument (uri): Unknown package: Instance of '_SimpleUri'
#0      _resolveUri.<anonymous closure> (package:dartdoc/src/generator/resource_loader.dart:34:9)
#1      _RootZone.runUnary (dart:async/zone.dart:1612:54)
#2      _FutureListener.handleValue (dart:async/future_impl.dart:152:18)
#3      Future._propagateToListeners.handleValueCallback (dart:async/future_impl.dart:704:45)
#4      Future._propagateToListeners (dart:async/future_impl.dart:733:32)
#5      Future._completeWithValue (dart:async/future_impl.dart:539:5)
#6      Future._asyncCompleteWithValue.<anonymous closure> (dart:async/future_impl.dart:577:7)
#7      _microtaskLoop (dart:async/schedule_microtask.dart:40:21)
#8      _startMicrotaskLoop (dart:async/schedule_microtask.dart:49:5)
#9      _runPendingImmediateCallback (dart:isolate-patch/isolate_patch.dart:120:13)
#10     _RawReceivePortImpl._handleMessage (dart:isolate-patch/isolate_patch.dart:185:5)
Error: Process completed with exit code 255.
@ikbalkaya
Copy link
Contributor

I checked the related discussion linked to this issue. As far as I understood, @mattheworiordan pointed out fragile situation on passing types around in open. Should I assume that this issue attempts to address this (Strenghtening message passing. type serialisation, deserialisation etc.) @QuintinWillison ?

@QuintinWillison
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't think this issue is specific or focussed enough to add value now, especially given we came out of preview August 2021.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or improved functionality.
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants