UnixPB: Temporarily fix CentOS6 Adoptopenjdk_install role

[Willsparker]

ref: #1877

This is a temporary fix, to get the Docker C6 and VPC checks working for now- given that the requests are to our API server, I'm less scared about not validating those certs.

Checklist

• commit message has one of the standard prefixes
• FAQ.md updated if appropriate : N/A
• other documentation is changed or added (if applicable) : N/A
• playbook changes run through VPC or QPC (if you have access) : https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/VagrantPlaybookCheck/1012/console
• for inventory.yml changes, bastillion/nagios/jenkins updated accordingly : N/A

[Willsparker]

Note: Don't want to merge this until specifically @sxa has seen / reviewed this

[karianna]

Note: Don't want to merge this until specifically @sxa has seen / reviewed this

Doesn't look it worked?

[sxa]

This says "Temporarily" ... Does that mean there's a plan to have a proper fix somewhere? I really don't want to leave anything like this in place ...

[Willsparker]

Doesn't look it worked?

The check look like it failed when building the docker image .. The playbook should be fixed with this PR, but I'll look at that issue next :-)

This says "Temporarily" ... Does that mean there's a plan to have a proper fix somewhere? I really don't want to leave anything like this in place ...

I'll continue working on it - the initial thought was to have CentOS6 update Python to 2.7.9 at the beginning of the playbook, but that causes extra issues. What I've tried is in the referenced issue

[Willsparker]

Converting to Draft as I figure out the Dockerfile issue

[Willsparker]

Looks like upgrading pip has fixed the Dockerfile issue. I'm not sure why the Ansible_Lint check is failing - it seems to not like ansible/playbooks/adoptopenjdk_variables.yml for some reason.

[sxa]

ansible-lint failure has been raised #1926 as it's not just affecting this PR, so do not consider that a blocker.

[sxa]

NOTE TO REVIEWERS: Discussion currently continuing in #1877

[karianna]

@sxa should we put this in draft?

[Willsparker]

Closing as #1970 is better