[gov][pcac]: Correcting the document title #3119
Conversation
Based on the discussion in anuket-project#3045 Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
|
I would rather ask an Anuket clean and basically to remove common and gov. |
CsatariGergely
changed the title
CsatariGergely
changed the title
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
I agree that on the long run we should consolidate these, but I would not just remove them as there are lots of valuable things there. |
CsatariGergely
added
the
Merge-Ready
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
doc/common/chapter00.rst
Outdated
| 3. **Separation of concerns:** to promote lifecycle independence of | ||
| different architectural layers and modules (e.g., disaggregation of | ||
| software from hardware). | ||
| 4. **Automated lifecycle management:** to minimise the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LCM of what? If workloads, then "target zero downtime" is reasonable but if infrastructure then that is not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@pgoyal01 This is about the RM, therefore about infrastructure. Maybe we should remove the zero downtime requirement?
CsatariGergely
removed
the
Merge-Ready
Co-authored-by: Pankaj Goyal <52107136+pgoyal01@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because of RTD forcing the use of .readthedocs.yaml, we don't have another choice than splitting the git repository per stream. This PR must be applied on next RM's git repository and not here.
Everything is already ready on my own repositories but sadly I don't have the rights needed on anuket-project organization. Please give me them to complete the migration.
Be free to ask for any detail about the migration during a Weekly Technical meeting.
Based on the discussion in #3045