-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow pre-population of trigger form values via URL parameters #37497
Merged
potiuk
merged 2 commits into
apache:main
from
boschglobal:bugfix/32859-allow-pre-populate-form-fields-in-trigger-form
Feb 20, 2024
Merged
Allow pre-population of trigger form values via URL parameters #37497
potiuk
merged 2 commits into
apache:main
from
boschglobal:bugfix/32859-allow-pre-populate-form-fields-in-trigger-form
Feb 20, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jscheffl
added
type:bug-fix
Changelog: Bug Fixes
area:UI
Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers.
labels
Feb 16, 2024
jscheffl
requested review from
ryanahamilton,
ashb,
bbovenzi,
pierrejeambrun and
potiuk
as code owners
February 16, 2024 22:42
boring-cyborg
bot
added
area:webserver
Webserver related Issues
kind:documentation
labels
Feb 16, 2024
dirrao
requested changes
Feb 17, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Static checks are failing.
jscheffl
force-pushed
the
bugfix/32859-allow-pre-populate-form-fields-in-trigger-form
branch
from
February 17, 2024 14:42
82c6f20
to
ce46d8c
Compare
jscheffl
force-pushed
the
bugfix/32859-allow-pre-populate-form-fields-in-trigger-form
branch
from
February 20, 2024 19:48
ce46d8c
to
be98590
Compare
bbovenzi
approved these changes
Feb 20, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
UI part makes sense to me. I'd appreciate someone to check the python code a bit more
potiuk
approved these changes
Feb 20, 2024
68 tasks
ephraimbuddy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2024
* Allow pre-population of trigger form values via URL parameters * Fix docs reference (cherry picked from commit 099925b)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area:UI
Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers.
area:webserver
Webserver related Issues
kind:documentation
type:bug-fix
Changelog: Bug Fixes
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds the (missing) option reported as Bug a while ago that the DAG trigger form can be called with default values populated.
How to test:
example_params_ui_tutorial
and add URL parameters and see fields are pre-populated, e.g./dags/example_params_ui_tutorial/trigger?required_field=some text
flag=true
orflag=false
array_of_numbers=[17,18,19]
object={"x":789}
run_id=manual__12345
(and expand the lower section seeing run_id being pre-populated)text=<script>alert(1)</script>
(and see that it is not possible to XSS a value in)closes: #32859
FYI @AutomationDev85