Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flink registrar #40

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ravwojdyla
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Rafal Wojdyla added 2 commits March 11, 2016 13:40
Expose Flink runner and options via AuteService. AuteService will
at compile time populate META-INF/services so that Dataflow sdk
can seamlessly pick up FlinkRunner.
 * separate test from compile and runtime deps
@ravwojdyla
Copy link
Contributor Author

ping @mxm - copy from dataArtisans/flink-dataflow#22

@davorbonaci
Copy link
Member

Apache ICLA might be needed for us to merge. We have to clarify the contribution rules -- sorry for not being completely ready to take contributions yet.

@ravwojdyla
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davorbonaci thanks for reaching out! is there anything I need to do?

@davorbonaci
Copy link
Member

We haven't yet adopted the guidelines what is specifically required. Please bear with us until early next week until we clarify this.

@mxm
Copy link
Contributor

mxm commented Mar 16, 2016

From http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas

The ICLA is necessary for committers:

A signed ICLA is required to be on file before an individual is given commit rights to an ASF project.

Further:

The ASF desires that all contributors of ideas, code, or documentation to any Apache projects complete, sign, and submit (via fax or email) an Individual Contributor License Agreement (ICLA)

For small contributions like this, we're at a grey spot. So if in doubt, you could simply file the ICLA and submit it to secretary@apache.org. It is a one-time process which shouldn't take long.

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

For leisurely reading, the ICLA+PR issue is discussed in this general@incubator thread from 2015-01 and then this incubator-tinkerpop-dev thread from 2015-02. It centers on clause 5. Has there been resolution since then?

@davorbonaci
Copy link
Member

Exactly -- that's is exactly a part of our soon-to-be-proposed contribution guidelines, which was also discussed with @jbonofre.

So, I think this pull request can proceed with any CLAs.

@mxm, do you want to take the review & merge of this one?

@mxm
Copy link
Contributor

mxm commented Mar 17, 2016

Thanks for the input @kennknowles. I think we're pretty much on the safe side then for contributions like this one.

@davorbonaci Sure I'll take care.

<artifactId>flink-test-utils_${scala.major.version}</artifactId>
<version>${flink.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This has been restructured in the meantime. I won't merge this commit.

mxm pushed a commit to mxm/beam that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2016
Expose Flink runner and options via AuteService. AuteService will
at compile time populate META-INF/services so that Dataflow sdk
can seamlessly pick up FlinkRunner.

This closes apache#40.
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 086a35e Mar 21, 2016
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2016
mxm pushed a commit to mxm/beam that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2016
Expose Flink runner and options via AuteService. AuteService will
at compile time populate META-INF/services so that Dataflow sdk
can seamlessly pick up FlinkRunner.

This closes apache#40.
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2016
Expose Flink runner and options via AuteService. AuteService will
at compile time populate META-INF/services so that Dataflow sdk
can seamlessly pick up FlinkRunner.

This closes #40.
aljoscha pushed a commit to aljoscha/beam that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2018
Flatten artifact names by escaping full paths
mareksimunek pushed a commit to mareksimunek/beam that referenced this pull request May 9, 2018
* #! - eclipse compilation

* apache#40 - Sort operator with in-memory RSBK sorting

* apache#40 - Spark SortTranslator

* apache#40 - Flink SortTranslator

* apache#40 - RangePartitioning

* apache#40 - PR#99
dmvk pushed a commit to dmvk/beam that referenced this pull request May 15, 2018
* #! - eclipse compilation

* apache#40 - Sort operator with in-memory RSBK sorting

* apache#40 - Spark SortTranslator

* apache#40 - Flink SortTranslator

* apache#40 - RangePartitioning

* apache#40 - PR#99
tvalentyn pushed a commit to tvalentyn/beam that referenced this pull request May 15, 2018
tvalentyn pushed a commit to tvalentyn/beam that referenced this pull request May 15, 2018
mareksimunek referenced this pull request in seznam/beam Jul 9, 2018
* #! - eclipse compilation

* #40 - Sort operator with in-memory RSBK sorting

* #40 - Spark SortTranslator

* #40 - Flink SortTranslator

* #40 - RangePartitioning

* #40 - PR#99
dmvk referenced this pull request in seznam/beam Aug 17, 2018
* #! - eclipse compilation

* #40 - Sort operator with in-memory RSBK sorting

* #40 - Spark SortTranslator

* #40 - Flink SortTranslator

* #40 - RangePartitioning

* #40 - PR#99
kennknowles pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2018
* #! - eclipse compilation

* #40 - Sort operator with in-memory RSBK sorting

* #40 - Spark SortTranslator

* #40 - Flink SortTranslator

* #40 - RangePartitioning

* #40 - PR#99
robertwb pushed a commit to robertwb/incubator-beam that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2020
robertwb pushed a commit to robertwb/incubator-beam that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2020
sjvanrossum pushed a commit to sjvanrossum/beam that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
pl04351820 pushed a commit to pl04351820/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants