[MINOR] Refactor some sql tests to use assert_contains! macro
#931
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
alamb
force-pushed
the
alamb/more_assert_contains
branch
from
6a5aa0b to
4f841c4
Compare
houqp
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2021
alamb
force-pushed
the
alamb/more_assert_contains
branch
from
4f841c4 to
bd12ab3
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Re: #917
Rationale for this change
assert_contains!added in #929 can reduce repetition in testsWhat changes are included in this PR?
assert_not_contains!macrosAre there any user-facing changes?
no