Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix](date_function) fix str_to_date function return wrong microsecond issue #47252

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

Yulei-Yang
Copy link
Contributor

bp #47129

fix such issue both in legacy & nereids planner

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

…d issue (apache#47129)

Issue Number: close apache#47105

Related PR: apache#24932

Problem Summary:

str_to_date always return microsecond part for datetime even if user
does not specfic %f in date format string. This is wrong.
mysql> select id,str_to_date(dt, '%Y-%m-%d %H:%i:%s') from test1 limit
1;
+------+--------------------------------------+
| id   | str_to_date(dt, '%Y-%m-%d %H:%i:%s') |
+------+--------------------------------------+
|    2 | 2024-12-28 10:11:12.000000           |
+------+--------------------------------------+

and constant fold scenario is wrong too:
mysql> select cast(str_to_date('2025-01-17 11:59:30', '%Y-%m-%d
%H:%i:%s') as string);

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| cast(str_to_date('2025-01-17 11:59:30', '%Y-%m-%d %H:%i:%s') as TEXT)
|

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 2025-01-17 11:59:30.000000 |

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
    - [x] Regression test
    - [ ] Unit Test
    - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
        - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
        - [ ] No code files have been changed.
        - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->

- Behavior changed:
    - [x] No.
    - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->

- Does this need documentation?
    - [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->

- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@Yulei-Yang
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@Yulei-Yang
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@Yulei-Yang
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 8925a39 into apache:branch-2.1 Jan 24, 2025
20 checks passed
@Yulei-Yang Yulei-Yang deleted the fix_str_to_date_for_v21 branch January 24, 2025 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants