[INLONG-9795][Sort] Regarding the format optimization of the data type definition

[YaziLee]

Prepare a Pull Request

• Title Example: [INLONG-9795][Sort] Regarding the format optimization of the data typ…

• Fixes [Improve][Sort] Regarding the format optimization of the data type enumeration definition of the Redis connector project module. #9795

Motivation

The current enumeration class org.apache.inlong.sort.redis.common.config.RedisDataType is defined as,
; symbol ends. Although there is no grammatical problem with this, the code looks confusing, so it is recommended to modify it and remove it.
; symbol and add ";" that makes the code look clearer.

Modifications

Removed the trailing symbol "" of the enumeration class org.apache.inlong.sort.redis.common.config.RedisDataType,
;".

Verifying this change

None

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no) no
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
• If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
• If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a follow-up issue for adding the documentation

[baomingyu]

…e enumeration definition of the Redis connector project module.

Prepare a Pull Request

• Title Example: [INLONG-9795][Sort] Regarding the format optimization of the data typ…
• Fixes [Improve][Sort] Regarding the format optimization of the data type enumeration definition of the Redis connector project module. #9795

Motivation

The current enumeration class org.apache.inlong.sort.redis.common.config.RedisDataType is defined as, ; symbol ends. Although there is no grammatical problem with this, the code looks confusing, so it is recommended to modify it and remove it. ; symbol and add ";" that makes the code look clearer.

Modifications

Removed the trailing symbol "" of the enumeration class org.apache.inlong.sort.redis.common.config.RedisDataType, ;".

Verifying this change

None

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no) no
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
• If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
• If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a follow-up issue for adding the documentation

Modify title please!

[aloyszhang]

duplicated pull request with #9764

[aloyszhang]

Hi @YaziLee,
I think you're trying to resolve the comment #9764 (comment).
It's better to resolve it in the original pull request(#9764 )

[aloyszhang]

close this pull request first since duplciated with #9764