[SPARK-44836][PYTHON] Refactor Arrow Python UDTF #42520
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
For 3.5: #42522 as this changes Spark Connect client implementation. |
dtenedor
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2023
ueshin
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2023
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a backport of #42520. Refactors Arrow Python UDTF. ### Why are the changes needed? Arrow Python UDTF is not need to be redefined when creating it. It can be handled in `worker.py`. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? The existing tests. Closes #42522 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-44836/3.5/refactor_arrow_udtf. Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
|
Thanks! merging to master. |
wangyum
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2023
…lts of the udtf tests ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a follow up for #42517. We need to re-generate the analyzer results for udtf tests after #42519 is merged. Also updated PythonUDTFSuite after #42520 is merged. ### Why are the changes needed? To fix test failures ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Test only change Closes #42543 from allisonwang-db/spark-44834-fix. Authored-by: allisonwang-db <allison.wang@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
wangyum
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2023
…lts of the udtf tests ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a follow up for #42517. We need to re-generate the analyzer results for udtf tests after #42519 is merged. Also updated PythonUDTFSuite after #42520 is merged. ### Why are the changes needed? To fix test failures ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Test only change Closes #42543 from allisonwang-db/spark-44834-fix. Authored-by: allisonwang-db <allison.wang@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com> (cherry picked from commit bb41cd8) Signed-off-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
valentinp17
pushed a commit
to valentinp17/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Refactors Arrow Python UDTF. ### Why are the changes needed? Arrow Python UDTF is not need to be redefined when creating it. It can be handled in `worker.py`. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? The existing tests. Closes apache#42520 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-44836/refactor_arrow_udtf. Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
valentinp17
pushed a commit
to valentinp17/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
…lts of the udtf tests ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a follow up for apache#42517. We need to re-generate the analyzer results for udtf tests after apache#42519 is merged. Also updated PythonUDTFSuite after apache#42520 is merged. ### Why are the changes needed? To fix test failures ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Test only change Closes apache#42543 from allisonwang-db/spark-44834-fix. Authored-by: allisonwang-db <allison.wang@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
ragnarok56
pushed a commit
to ragnarok56/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Refactors Arrow Python UDTF. ### Why are the changes needed? Arrow Python UDTF is not need to be redefined when creating it. It can be handled in `worker.py`. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? The existing tests. Closes apache#42520 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-44836/refactor_arrow_udtf. Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
ragnarok56
pushed a commit
to ragnarok56/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2024
…lts of the udtf tests ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a follow up for apache#42517. We need to re-generate the analyzer results for udtf tests after apache#42519 is merged. Also updated PythonUDTFSuite after apache#42520 is merged. ### Why are the changes needed? To fix test failures ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Test only change Closes apache#42543 from allisonwang-db/spark-44834-fix. Authored-by: allisonwang-db <allison.wang@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactors Arrow Python UDTF.
Why are the changes needed?
Arrow Python UDTF is not need to be redefined when creating it. It can be handled in
worker.py.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.