-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement rewriting subseteq with forall quantification in Keramelizer #1621
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## unstable #1621 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 75.13% 75.17% +0.03%
============================================
Files 356 356
Lines 11555 11568 +13
Branches 541 543 +2
============================================
+ Hits 8682 8696 +14
+ Misses 2873 2872 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mostly some style-preference comments, the only required fix are the types of forall
, which should be Boolean.
tla-pp/src/main/scala/at/forsyte/apalache/tla/pp/Keramelizer.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tla-pp/src/main/scala/at/forsyte/apalache/tla/pp/Keramelizer.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tla-pp/src/main/scala/at/forsyte/apalache/tla/pp/Keramelizer.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tla-pp/src/main/scala/at/forsyte/apalache/tla/pp/Keramelizer.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tla-pp/src/test/scala/at/forsyte/apalache/tla/pp/TestKeramelizer.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
This is the same rewriting as applied in Keramelizer in #1621
make fmt-fix
(or had formatting run automatically on all files edited)Documentation added for any new functionality