-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP Improved cover analysis output #308
Conversation
Side-note, I see some tests are failing because source information for operators is unavailable, this is an indication of an unrelated underlying bug. |
I suggest we fix the underling but here, or else in a separate PR that we merge in ahead of this one. We don't want to break the integration tests on the development branch, because it could then hide other regressions that show up later (prior to getting in the proper fix). |
The reordering of passes to accommodate the new cover analysis (specifically, addressing the incompatibility with inlining, which now deletes operator definitions from the module) should get its own PR, so this one should be put on hold until all bugs arising from the reordering are isolated, as not to get saturated with commits not related to cover analysis. |
(Marked as WIP so it doesn't show in our daily alerts for stale PRs) :) |
What is the status of this PR? |
#366 removed the need for cover analysis, so I'm scrapping this PR. |
For example, given
the new output is
Closes #298.