-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[AR] Fix the problem with toolbar visibility in list view mode (1px gap) #37220
Labels
IDE Pod
Issues that new developers face while exploring the IDE
IDE Product
Issues related to the IDE Product
Task
A simple Todo
Comments
alex-golovanov
added
IDE Pod
Issues that new developers face while exploring the IDE
IDE Product
Issues related to the IDE Product
labels
Nov 5, 2024
2 tasks
alex-golovanov
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 6, 2024
## Description Remove a small gap that revealed a slice of action bar. Fixes #37220 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11688613194> > Commit: 87b7ed8 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11688613194&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.IDE` > Spec: > <hr>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:13:44 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Style** - Updated the positioning and padding of the List component for improved layout. - Adjusted the styling of the ListContainer for better visual alignment. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
rahulbarwal
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 6, 2024
Implement `useUnmountFieldValidation` for better field validation during unmounting in JSON form widget
rahulbarwal
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2024
…#37259) ## Description <ins>Problem</ins> When deleting all fields of array item, submit became disabled. <ins>Root cause</ins> The JSON form widget did not properly handle field validation during unmounting of array items, leading to inconsistencies in the form's error state. <ins>Solution</ins> This PR implements `useUnmountFieldValidation` to `FieldRenderer.tsx`, enhancing field validation for array items in the JSON form widget. This PR handles... - Ensuring proper cleanup of field validation when an array field is removed from the form, resolving visibility issues in list view mode. - Maintaining a consistent and accurate form state even after field removal. Fixes #18752 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.JSONForm" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11703351095> > Commit: 521fd25 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11703351095&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.JSONForm` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 12:45:42 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new mechanism for handling field validation upon unmounting in the form widget. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved field validation logic to enhance form data management during component unmounting. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to Zeral-Zhang/appsmith
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2024
## Description Remove a small gap that revealed a slice of action bar. Fixes appsmithorg#37220 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11688613194> > Commit: 87b7ed8 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11688613194&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.IDE` > Spec: > <hr>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:13:44 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Style** - Updated the positioning and padding of the List component for improved layout. - Adjusted the styling of the ListContainer for better visual alignment. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to Zeral-Zhang/appsmith
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2024
…horg#37220) (appsmithorg#37259) ## Description <ins>Problem</ins> When deleting all fields of array item, submit became disabled. <ins>Root cause</ins> The JSON form widget did not properly handle field validation during unmounting of array items, leading to inconsistencies in the form's error state. <ins>Solution</ins> This PR implements `useUnmountFieldValidation` to `FieldRenderer.tsx`, enhancing field validation for array items in the JSON form widget. This PR handles... - Ensuring proper cleanup of field validation when an array field is removed from the form, resolving visibility issues in list view mode. - Maintaining a consistent and accurate form state even after field removal. Fixes appsmithorg#18752 _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.JSONForm" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11703351095> > Commit: 521fd25 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11703351095&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.JSONForm` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 12:45:42 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new mechanism for handling field validation upon unmounting in the form widget. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved field validation logic to enhance form data management during component unmounting. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
IDE Pod
Issues that new developers face while exploring the IDE
IDE Product
Issues related to the IDE Product
Task
A simple Todo
https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Entity-explorer-has-a-1px-gap-12dfe271b0e280919030e83d62f072cb?pvs=4
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: