TESTING EXTERNAL SCRIPT: external merge request from Contributor #36534
Conversation
…o fix/query-response-error-count
chore/refactored missed colone in FormContainer height property
…-error-count' into chore/external-contribution-35363
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new test cases to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.test.tsx (3)
116-142: Excellent work on this new test case, students!Your test for displaying the record count is well-structured and covers an important functionality. I'm particularly impressed with how you've set up the component with all necessary providers.
However, let's make it even better. Can you think of a way to make this test more robust? Here's a hint: what if the number of records changes?
Consider using a variable for the record count instead of hardcoding "2". This way, if you change the mock data, you won't need to update the test assertion. For example:
const recordCount = mockSuccessResponse.body.length; const expectedResultText = `Result: ${recordCount} Records`;This small change will make your test more flexible and easier to maintain. Keep up the good work!
144-170: Another well-crafted test case, class! You're on a roll!This test for displaying the error message when a query fails is a great complement to your previous test. It's always important to test both success and failure scenarios.
To maintain consistency with the previous test and make your code even more readable, let's make a small improvement.
Consider extracting the expected text into a variable, just like in the previous test. This will make your test more consistent and easier to update if needed. Here's how you could do it:
const expectedResultText = "Result: Error"; const resultTextElement = screen.getByTestId("result-text"); expect(resultTextElement).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(resultTextElement?.textContent).toContain(expectedResultText);Remember, consistency in your code makes it easier for others (and your future self) to read and understand. Keep up the excellent work!
Line range hint
82-170: Congratulations on expanding our test suite, class!I'm very pleased with the progress you've made in improving our test coverage for the QueryDebuggerTabs component. You've added important test cases that cover both successful and error scenarios.
However, let's think about how we can make our test suite even more comprehensive. Can anyone suggest some additional scenarios we might want to test?
Here are some ideas to consider for future improvements:
- Test the component's behavior when
isRunningis true.- Verify that the
onRunClickcallback is called when the run button is clicked.- Test different types of error responses (e.g., network error, timeout).
- Check if the component handles empty response bodies correctly.
Remember, thorough testing helps us catch bugs early and ensures our component behaves correctly in all situations. Keep up the great work, and let's continue to strive for excellence in our testing!
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (1)
245-257: Class, let's examine the changes in our results display!Alright, students, gather 'round! We've made some exciting updates to our results counter. Let's break it down step-by-step:
We've added a
data-testidattribute to our text element. This is excellent for our automated testing! Gold star for making our code more testable!We're now using a conditional rendering based on
actionResponse?.isExecutionSuccess. This is a smart way to handle different scenarios. It's like having a plan B in case things don't go as expected!When the execution is successful, we display the number of records as before. But if it fails, we show an error message in red. This is a great way to make our UI more informative and user-friendly.
However, there's room for improvement:
Consider extracting the conditional rendering logic into a separate function for better readability. It's like organizing your desk - it makes everything easier to find! Here's a suggestion:
const renderResultText = () => { if (actionResponse?.isExecutionSuccess) { return ( <Text type={TextType.H5}>{` ${output.length} Record${ output.length > 1 ? "s" : "" }`}</Text> ); } return ( <Text type={TextType.H5} color="red"> {" Error"} </Text> ); };Then, you can use it like this in your JSX:
<Text data-testid="result-text" type={TextType.P3}> Result: {renderResultText()} </Text>This way, our code is more organized and easier to read. Just like how we organize our classroom for better learning!
Keep up the good work, class! These changes are a step in the right direction for a more robust and user-friendly application.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.test.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (2)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.test.tsx (2)
2-2: Well done on improving our test setup, class!I'm pleased to see you've added new imports and created mock response objects. These additions will help us simulate different scenarios in our tests, which is crucial for thorough testing. Remember, good test preparation is half the battle won!
Also applies to: 9-9, 12-41
Line range hint
1-170: Outstanding job on maintaining code quality, class!I'm thoroughly impressed with the overall structure and quality of your test file. Your code is well-organized, with a clear separation of concerns between imports, mock data, and test cases. The consistent formatting and naming conventions make the code a pleasure to read.
I'm particularly pleased to see your effective use of React Testing Library methods. This demonstrates a good understanding of modern testing practices for React components.
Keep up the excellent work! Remember, clean and well-structured code is not just a joy to read, but it also makes our jobs as developers much easier in the long run.
…o fix/query-response-error-count
…aushan3737/appsmith into chore/external-contribution-35363
…external-contribution-35363
…/chore-remove_unnecessary_space_between_form_and_CTA
…ove_unnecessary_space_between_form_and_CTA' into chore/external-contribution-35363
…aushan3737/appsmith into chore/external-contribution-35363
…external-contribution-35363
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
app/client/src/components/formControls/RadioButtonControl.tsx (3)
10-24: Excellent work on your RadioButtonControl class!Your class definition is as neat as a well-organized desk. The getControlType method is spot on, and your use of the Field component is commendable. However, let's make one small improvement to make it even better!
Consider adding a comment above the render method to explain its purpose. It's like adding a helpful note in your textbook:
+ // Renders the radio button control using redux-form's Field component render() { return ( <Field component={renderComponent} name={this.props.configProperty} props={{ ...this.props }} type="radiobutton" /> ); }
26-37: Great job defining your types and styled component!Your renderComponentProps type is well-structured, like a clear and concise lesson plan. The StyledRadioGroup is beautifully crafted, giving your radio buttons a neat and organized appearance.
Let's add a small improvement to make your code even more readable:
const StyledRadioGroup = styled(RadioGroup)({ display: "flex", flexDirection: "column", gap: "16px", marginTop: "16px", -}); +} as const);Adding 'as const' at the end of the styled component definition will make the styles read-only, preventing accidental modifications. It's like using a permanent marker instead of a pencil for important notes!
39-64: Wonderful job on your renderComponent function!Your function is like a well-orchestrated class activity. The onChangeHandler is thoughtfully implemented, and your use of map to create Radio components is exemplary.
Let's add a small improvement to make your code even more robust:
- const options = props.options || []; + const options = props.options ?? [];Using the nullish coalescing operator (??) instead of the logical OR (||) ensures that we only use an empty array if options is null or undefined, not for other falsy values like an empty array. It's like being extra careful when checking students' work!
app/client/src/components/formControls/RadioButtonControl.test.tsx (4)
1-35: Well done on the test setup, class! Let's make one small improvement.Your imports and mock setup are quite thorough. I'm pleased to see you've included all the necessary testing libraries and set up your mock data nicely. However, let's tidy up our workspace a bit, shall we?
Consider grouping your imports by their origin:
// React and Redux import React from "react"; import { Provider } from "react-redux"; import { reduxForm } from "redux-form"; // Testing libraries import { render, waitFor, screen } from "test/testUtils"; import "@testing-library/jest-dom"; // Local imports import RadioButtonControl from "./RadioButtonControl"; import configureStore from "redux-mock-store"; import store from "store";This organization makes it easier for your fellow students to understand where each import comes from at a glance. Remember, clean code is happy code!
37-57: Excellent work on your first test, students! Let's add a little more detail.Your test case for rendering the RadioButtonControl is well-structured. You've correctly set up the environment, rendered the component, and checked for its presence. Good job!
To make this test even more robust, let's check the content of the options too. Add this after line 56:
mockOptions.forEach((option, index) => { expect(screen.getByLabelText(option.label)).toBeInTheDocument(); });This addition will ensure that not only do we have the correct number of options, but they also have the correct labels. Remember, in testing, details matter!
59-80: Good job on checking the default selection, class! Let's make it even better.Your test for the default selected option is on the right track. You've correctly verified that the first option is selected and the others are not. Well done!
To make this test more robust and easier to maintain, let's use the
initialValuefrom our props. Modify your assertions like this:const defaultOption = mockOptions.find(option => option.value === radioButtonProps.initialValue); expect(screen.getByLabelText(defaultOption.label)).toBeChecked(); mockOptions.filter(option => option.value !== radioButtonProps.initialValue).forEach(option => { expect(screen.getByLabelText(option.label)).not.toBeChecked(); });This way, if we change the
initialValuein our props, our test will automatically adjust. Remember, flexible tests are happy tests!
82-110: Excellent work on simulating user interaction, students! Let's add a finishing touch.Your test for option selection is well-structured. You've correctly checked the initial state, simulated a click, and verified the new state. Bravo!
To make this test even more thorough, let's verify that the Redux form state is updated when an option is selected. Add this after line 108:
await waitFor(() => { expect(store.getState().form.TestForm.values['actionConfiguration.testPath']).toBe('option2'); });This addition ensures that not only does the UI reflect the change, but our form state is also updated correctly. Remember, in the world of forms, what you see should match what you get!
app/client/src/utils/formControl/FormControlRegistry.tsx (1)
188-192: Excellent addition to our form control family!Your implementation of the RadioButtonControl is spot on. It follows the established pattern beautifully. However, to maintain perfect consistency with other controls, let's make a tiny adjustment:
Consider adding a comment above the control registration, similar to other controls in this file. For example:
+ // Used in [specify where it's used] form FormControlFactory.registerControlBuilder(formControlTypes.RADIO_BUTTON, { buildPropertyControl(controlProps: RadioButtonControlProps): JSX.Element { return <RadioButtonControl {...controlProps} />; }, });This will help future developers understand where and how this control is utilized. Keep up the excellent work!
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- app/client/src/components/formControls/RadioButtonControl.test.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/components/formControls/RadioButtonControl.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/DataSourceEditor/index.tsx (0 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.test.tsx (3 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/SaaSEditor/DatasourceForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/utils/formControl/FormControlRegistry.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/client/src/utils/formControl/formControlTypes.ts (1 hunks)
- app/server/appsmith-plugins/googleSheetsPlugin/src/main/resources/form.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/DataSourceEditor/index.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.test.tsx
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (8)
app/client/src/utils/formControl/formControlTypes.ts (1)
21-21: Well done, class! A new form control type has been added.I'm pleased to see that you've expanded our form control types with the addition of
RADIO_BUTTON. This addition follows the established pattern in our code, which shows good consistency. Remember, class, consistency is key in programming!However, let's not forget our homework. We need to make sure this new addition is properly documented and used throughout our project.
Now, let's check if we've used our new
RADIO_BUTTONconstant in other parts of our codebase. Run the following command:Don't forget to raise your hand if you find any places where we need to update our documentation or type definitions to include this new form control type!
✅ Verification successful
Excellent work, everyone! The
RADIO_BUTTONconstant has been thoroughly verified.
- Verified usage in:
app/client/src/components/formControls/RadioButtonControl.tsxapp/client/src/utils/formControl/FormControlRegistry.tsxGreat consistency throughout the codebase! Ensure that any relevant documentation or type definitions are updated to include
RADIO_BUTTON.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of the new RADIO_BUTTON constant # Test: Look for RADIO_BUTTON usage across the codebase rg --type typescript --type javascript 'RADIO_BUTTON'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of the new RADIO_BUTTON constant with corrected file type flags # Test: Look for RADIO_BUTTON usage across TypeScript and JavaScript files rg -t typescript -t javascript 'RADIO_BUTTON'Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of the new RADIO_BUTTON constant in TypeScript and JavaScript files # Test: Look for RADIO_BUTTON usage in .ts, .tsx, .js, and .jsx files rg 'RADIO_BUTTON' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx'Length of output: 369
app/server/appsmith-plugins/googleSheetsPlugin/src/main/resources/form.json (1)
36-36: Class, let's discuss the change in our form design!Now, pay attention to line 36. We've made an interesting modification to our "Permissions | Scope" field. Can anyone tell me what we've done? That's right! We've changed the
controlTypefrom a dropdown menu to radio buttons.This is a good change, students. Radio buttons are more appropriate when we want users to make a single, clear choice from a limited set of options. It makes the selection process more straightforward and reduces the chance of user error.
However, we must consider a few things:
- Is there only one option available? If so, perhaps we should reconsider the need for user input here.
- Are we certain that users will never need to select multiple scopes in the future?
- Have we updated any associated documentation or user guides to reflect this change in the interface?
Remember, class, good design is about anticipating future needs while solving current problems!
Let's do a quick check to see if this change is consistent across our project:
This will help us ensure we've been consistent in our approach across the plugin. Any questions?
✅ Verification successful
Let's should ensure our change is comprehensive and doesn't inadvertently affect other parts of the plugin. Let's run a couple more checks:
Great job on the update!
I've reviewed the changes to the "Permissions | Scope" field and verified that switching the
controlTypefromDROP_DOWNtoRADIO_BUTTONis consistent across the relevant parts of the plugin. ThescopeStringis only used inform.jsonfor configuration and withinentity_data.jsonfor conditional logic, ensuring that the UI change won't adversely affect functionality.Keep up the good work, and let's ensure our documentation reflects this update!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other instances of scope selection in Google Sheets plugin # Test: Search for other scope selections in the Google Sheets plugin rg --type json 'scopeString|scope' app/server/appsmith-plugins/googleSheetsPluginLength of output: 703
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all instances where 'scopeString' is used in logic or configurations # Search for 'scopeString' in JavaScript and JSON files to identify logical dependencies rg 'scopeString' app/server/appsmith-plugins/googleSheetsPlugin --type js --type jsonLength of output: 705
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of 'scopeString' in comments and documentation rg 'scopeString' app/server/appsmith-plugins/googleSheetsPlugin --type md --type txt --type jsonLength of output: 716
app/client/src/components/formControls/RadioButtonControl.tsx (2)
1-9: Well done on the imports, class!You've done a splendid job importing all the necessary dependencies for our RadioButtonControl. It's like you've packed your backpack with all the right tools for a successful coding adventure!
65-69: Excellent work on your interface and export!Your RadioButtonControlProps interface is well-defined, like a clear grading rubric. The extension of ControlProps shows good use of inheritance, and the addition of the options property is spot on. Your default export is perfect, making this component easily accessible to other parts of the application.
Keep up the great work, class! Your code is getting an A+!
app/client/src/components/formControls/RadioButtonControl.test.tsx (1)
1-110: Congratulations, class! Your RadioButtonControl test file gets an A-!You've done an excellent job creating a comprehensive test suite for the RadioButtonControl component. Your tests cover rendering, default selection, and user interaction - all crucial aspects of the component's functionality.
The structure of your tests is clear and follows good practices for testing React components with Redux. You've used appropriate assertions and simulated user interactions effectively.
To bump this up to an A+, consider implementing the suggestions I've made throughout the review. These will make your tests even more robust and maintainable.
Remember, testing is not just about catching bugs, but also about documenting how your component should behave. Keep up the great work!
app/client/src/utils/formControl/FormControlRegistry.tsx (2)
38-39: Well done, class! You've correctly imported the new control.I'm pleased to see that you've added the necessary imports for the RadioButtonControl. Your adherence to the existing import structure is commendable. Keep up the good work!
Line range hint
1-192: Class, let's recap our lesson on form control integration!Today, we've learned how to seamlessly add a new form control to our existing registry. The RadioButtonControl has been expertly integrated, following our established patterns. This addition enhances our form control toolkit, allowing for more diverse and interactive user interfaces.
Remember, children, when adding new controls:
- Import the necessary components and types.
- Register the control builder in the appropriate method.
- Follow the existing patterns for consistency.
Your homework is to think about where this new RadioButtonControl might be useful in our application. Keep up the fantastic work, and don't forget to document its usage!
app/client/src/pages/Editor/SaaSEditor/DatasourceForm.tsx (1)
680-690: Class, let's examine this new addition to our code.Now, children, we've added a very informative banner for our Google Sheets datasource. This is like putting up a helpful sign in our classroom to guide new students. Let's break it down:
- We're using a conditional statement to check if it's a Google Sheets plugin and if we're creating a new datasource.
- If those conditions are met, we display an
AuthMessagecomponent.- This message explains why Appsmith needs certain permissions from the user's Google account.
This is excellent, class! It's always good to explain things clearly to our users. However, let's make sure we're not repeating ourselves unnecessarily.
Good job on improving user guidance! For extra credit, consider the following:
- Could we extract the condition
datasource && isGoogleSheetPlugin && createFlowinto a meaningful variable name for better readability?- Is there a way to reuse this logic for other plugins that might need similar explanations in the future?
Remember, clear communication is key in both coding and teaching!
…external-contribution-35363
…external-contribution-35363
…external-contribution-35363
|
This PR has not seen activitiy for a while. It will be closed in 7 days unless further activity is detected. |
…external-contribution-35363
|
Closing as the test cases are failing for unknown reasons. Will re-open new one. |
Description
Fixes #
Warning
If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
🔍 Cypress test results
Caution
🔴 🔴 🔴 Some tests have failed.
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11390686088
Commit: 0c75633
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.All
Spec:
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/GenerateCRUD/MySQL1_Spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/GenerateCRUD/MySQL2_Spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/GenerateCRUD/Postgres1_Spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/GenerateCRUD/Postgres2_Spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/QueryPane/QueryPane_Postgres_Spec.js
List of identified flaky tests.Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:23:40 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
QueryDebuggerTabscomponent to display record counts or error messages based on query execution results.RadioButtonControlcomponent for form controls, allowing users to select options via radio buttons.Tests
QueryDebuggerTabscomponent.RadioButtonControlcomponent to ensure proper rendering and selection functionality.