-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(sequencer): implement refund to rollup logic upon ics20 transfer refund #1161
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
noot
commented
Jun 7, 2024
Comment on lines
38
to
42
ASTRIA_BRIDGE_WITHDRAWER_ROLLUP_ASSET_DENOMINATION="nria" | ||
|
||
# The hex-encoded bridge address corresponding to the bridged rollup asset on the sequencer. | ||
# Should match the bridge address in the geth rollup's bridge configuration for that asset. | ||
ASTRIA_BRIDGE_WITHDRAWER_SEQUENCER_BRIDGE_ADDRESS="" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i want to add these as immutable vars to the withdrawal contract instead of config values, will do in a follow up.
joroshiba
approved these changes
Jun 8, 2024
steezeburger
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2024
* main: fix: ignore RUSTSEC-2021-0139 (#1171) chore(sequencer-relayer)!: remove functionality to restrict relaying blocks to only those proposed by a given validator (#1168) chore(metrics): update `metric_name` macro to handle a collection of names (#1163) fix(bridge-withdrawer): skip linting generated contract code (#1172) fix(core, sequencer): prefix removal source non-refund ics20 packet (#1162) chore(docs): add sequencer-relayer doc to specs (#1126) feat(bridge-withdrawer): sync logic (#1165) chore(withdrawer): replace contracts with `astria-bridge-contracts` submodule (#1164) feat(sequencer)!: implement bridge sudo and withdrawer addresses (#1142) feat(sequencer): implement refund to rollup logic upon ics20 transfer refund (#1161) feat(bridge-withdrawer): bridge withdrawer startup (#1160) feat(core, proto)!: add bech32m addresses (#1124) feat(withdrawer): bridged ERC20 token withdrawals (#1149) feat(sequencer-relayer)!: add chain IDs for sequencer and Celestia to config env vars (#1063) test(bridge-withdrawer): add submitter tests (#1133) chore: bump penumbra deps (#1159) feat(sequencer): implement `bridge/account_last_tx_hash` abci query (#1158) fix(withdrawer): use block subscription in batcher; send to destination_chain_address (#1157) fix(withdrawer): update AstriaWithdrawer to check that withdrawal value is sufficient (#1148) chore(ci): build bridge withdrawer images (#1156)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
implement refund to rollup logic upon ics20 transfer refund, if the transfer originally can from an Ics20Withdrawal that corresponded to a rollup withdrawal
Background
we want to users to get their funds back in on the rollup automatically if they bridge out via IBC and it fails. currently, if bridging out from the rollup via IBC fails, their funds are returned on the sequencer, which would require the user to then manually do another
BridgeLock
if they want their funds back on the rollup.Changes
Deposit
event.Testing
unit tests
Related Issues
closes #1110