Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closes #126 - Update check for filename to allow underscore #208

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

cpiraux
Copy link
Collaborator

@cpiraux cpiraux commented Dec 18, 2023

Thank you for your Pull Request!

We have developed a Pull Request template to aid you and our reviewers. Completing the below tasks helps to ensure our reviewers can maximize their time on your code as well as making sure the xportr codebase remains robust and consistent.

The scope of {xportr}

{xportr}'s scope is to enable R users to write out submission compliant xpt files that can be delivered to a Health Authority or to downstream validation software programs. We see labels, lengths, types, ordering and formats from a dataset specification object (SDTM and ADaM) as being our primary focus. We also see messaging and warnings to users around applying information from the specification file as a primary focus. Please make sure your Pull Request meets this scope of {xportr}. If your Pull Request moves beyond this scope, please get in touch with the {xportr} team on slack or create an issue to discuss.

Please check off each task box as an acknowledgment that you completed the task. This checklist is part of the Github Action workflows and the Pull Request will not be merged into the devel branch until you have checked off each task.

Changes Description

Move the check for the file name to strict_check to allow underscores in the filename.

Task List

  • The spirit of xportr is met in your Pull Request
  • Place Closes #<insert_issue_number> into the beginning of your Pull Request Title (Use Edit button in top-right if you need to update)
  • Summary of changes filled out in the above Changes Description. Can be removed or left blank if changes are minor/self-explanatory.
  • Code is formatted according to the tidyverse style guide. Use styler package and functions to style files accordingly.
  • Updated relevant unit tests or have written new unit tests. See our Wiki for conventions used in this package.
  • Creation/updated relevant roxygen headers and examples. See our Wiki for conventions used in this package.
  • Run devtools::document() so all .Rd files in the man folder and the NAMESPACE file in the project root are updated appropriately
  • Run pkgdown::build_site() and check that all affected examples are displayed correctly and that all new/updated functions occur on the "Reference" page.
  • Update NEWS.md if the changes pertain to a user-facing function (i.e. it has an @export tag) or documentation aimed at users (rather than developers)
  • Make sure that the pacakge version in the NEWS.md and DESCRIPTION file is same. Don't worry about updating the version because it will be auto-updated using the vbump.yaml CI.
  • Address any updates needed for vignettes and/or templates
  • Link the issue Development Panel so that it closes after successful merging.
  • Fix merge conflicts
  • Pat yourself on the back for a job well done! Much love to your accomplishment!

@cpiraux cpiraux linked an issue Dec 18, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (601209f) 100.00% compared to head (2e592e0) 100.00%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #208   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           12        12           
  Lines          582       582           
=========================================
  Hits           582       582           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

R/write.R Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@bms63 bms63 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is newsworth! Can you make a short blurb in the NEws section about this relaxation of our checks

Copy link
Collaborator

@bms63 bms63 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's go!! Thanks for doing this one!!

@bms63 bms63 merged commit edae84f into main Jan 16, 2024
13 checks passed
@bms63 bms63 deleted the 126_filename_checks branch January 16, 2024 16:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

This check the output file name not the data value in the data frame
2 participants